Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 13:17 UTC

innovatrics / dot-js-kit

Face, ID document and palm photo web auto-capture components for identity verification in JavaScript

JavaScriptCustom license★ 23 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Apr 2021View on GitHub ↗

innovatrics/dot-js-kit holds a health index of 35 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (66/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (9/100). It was last updated 40 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

35
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

35
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 40 is calibrated to 35 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

InnovatricsOrganization · verified domain
51 followers31 public repossince Jan 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 40 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
14.3/18Commit volume — 38 commits in the last year
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
commits_last_year38
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push40
active_weeks_last_year17
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 94 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 40 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~16.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count94
latest_release_tagv8.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release40
mean_days_between_releases16.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
21.8/60Stars — 23 stars
5.8/25Forks — 6 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars23
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 70% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.701
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
20/30PR acceptance — 2/3 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
12.3/25Owner reach — 51 followers of innovatrics
23/25Track record — 31 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers51
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logininnovatrics
public_repos31
account_age_days3,184

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

25At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 19 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbiometrics, browser, document-scanning, face-capture, face-detection, id-document, identity, identity-verification, javascript, kyc, liveness, liveness-detection, onboarding, photo-capture, sdk, selfie, typescript, verification, palm-capture
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

27At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
4.5/7.5Maintained — 8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate0.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories29
affected_packages3
assessed_packages153
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 153 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

9Critical · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — 0 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
18.3/55Manageable file sizes — 4/6 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes431,799
source_files_sampled6
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

23GitHub stars
4contributors
38commits, last 12 months
40days since last push
94releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
59Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456612023-062025-012026-09
Major 4Minor 12Patch 43

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 0.9 / 10
0.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 13:17 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
6Maintained8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities29 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmrelease-it^20.2.0package.json
All dependencies 153

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 152 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmrelease-it20.2.0direct
npm@inquirer/ansi2.0.7indirect
npm@inquirer/checkbox5.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/confirm6.1.1indirect
npm@inquirer/core11.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/editor5.2.2indirect
npm@inquirer/expand5.1.1indirect
npm@inquirer/external-editor3.0.3indirect
npm@inquirer/figures2.0.7indirect
npm@inquirer/input5.1.2indirect
npm@inquirer/number4.1.1indirect
npm@inquirer/password5.1.1indirect
npm@inquirer/prompts8.4.2indirect
npm@inquirer/rawlist5.3.1indirect
npm@inquirer/search4.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/select5.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/type4.0.7indirect
npm@octokit/auth-token6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/core7.0.6indirect
npm@octokit/endpoint11.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/graphql9.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/openapi-types27.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest14.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-request-log6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods17.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/request10.0.10indirect
npm@octokit/request-error7.1.0indirect
npm@octokit/rest22.0.1indirect
npm@octokit/types16.0.0indirect
npm@phun-ky/typeof2.0.3indirect
npm@types/parse-path7.0.3indirect
npmagent-base8.0.0indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmast-types0.13.4indirect
npmasync-retry1.3.3indirect
npmbasic-ftp5.3.1indirect
npmbefore-after-hook4.0.0indirect
npmbundle-name4.1.0indirect
npmc123.3.3indirect
npmchalk5.6.2indirect
npmchardet2.2.0indirect
npmchokidar5.0.0indirect
npmci-info4.4.0indirect
npmcitty0.1.6indirect
npmcitty0.2.2indirect
npmcli-cursor5.0.0indirect
npmcli-spinners3.4.0indirect
npmcli-width4.1.0indirect
npmconfbox0.2.4indirect
npmconsola3.4.2indirect
npmcontent-type2.0.0indirect
npmdata-uri-to-buffer7.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdefault-browser5.5.0indirect
npmdefault-browser-id5.0.1indirect
npmdefine-lazy-prop3.0.0indirect
npmdefu6.1.7indirect
npmdegenerator6.0.0indirect
npmdestr2.0.5indirect
npmdotenv17.4.2indirect
npmescodegen2.1.0indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmeta4.5.1indirect
npmexsolve1.1.0indirect
npmfast-string-truncated-width3.0.3indirect
npmfast-string-width3.0.2indirect
npmfast-wrap-ansi0.2.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmget-uri7.0.0indirect
npmgiget2.0.0indirect
npmgit-up8.1.1indirect
npmgit-url-parse16.1.0indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent8.0.0indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent8.0.0indirect
npmiconv-lite0.7.2indirect
npmip-address10.2.0indirect
npmis-docker3.0.0indirect
npmis-in-ssh1.0.0indirect
npmis-inside-container1.0.0indirect
npmis-interactive2.0.0indirect
npmis-ssh1.4.1indirect
npmis-unicode-supported2.1.0indirect
npmis-wsl3.1.1indirect
npmissue-parser7.0.1indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmjson-with-bigint3.5.8indirect
npmlodash.capitalize4.2.1indirect
npmlodash.escaperegexp4.1.2indirect
npmlodash.isplainobject4.0.6indirect
npmlodash.isstring4.0.1indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmlodash.uniqby4.7.0indirect
npmlog-symbols7.0.1indirect
npmlru-cache7.18.3indirect
npmmacos-release3.5.1indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmime-types3.0.2indirect
npmmimic-function5.0.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmmute-stream3.0.0indirect
npmnetmask2.1.1indirect
npmnew-github-release-url2.0.0indirect
npmnode-fetch-native1.6.7indirect
npmnypm0.6.7indirect
npmohash2.0.11indirect
npmonetime7.0.0indirect
npmopen11.0.0indirect
npmora9.3.0indirect
npmos-name7.0.0indirect
npmpac-proxy-agent8.0.0indirect
npmpac-resolver8.0.0indirect
npmparse-path7.1.0indirect
npmparse-url9.2.0indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmperfect-debounce2.1.0indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpkg-types2.3.1indirect
npmpowershell-utils0.1.0indirect
npmpowershell-utils0.2.0indirect
npmprotocols2.0.2indirect
npmproxy-agent7.0.0indirect
npmproxy-from-env1.1.0indirect
npmquickjs-wasi0.0.1indirect
npmrc92.1.2indirect
npmreaddirp5.0.0indirect
npmrestore-cursor5.1.0indirect
npmretry0.13.1indirect
npmrun-applescript7.1.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsemver7.7.4indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmsmart-buffer4.2.0indirect
npmsocks2.8.9indirect
npmsocks-proxy-agent9.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmstdin-discarder0.3.2indirect
npmstring-width8.2.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.2.4indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.15indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtype-fest2.19.0indirect
npmundici7.24.5indirect
npmuniversal-user-agent7.0.3indirect
npmurl-join5.0.0indirect
npmwildcard-match5.1.4indirect
npmwindows-release7.1.1indirect
npmwsl-utils0.3.1indirect
npmyargs-parser22.0.0indirect
npmyoctocolors2.1.2indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 153 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
basic-ftp5.3.1indirecthigh16.2.1
undici7.24.5indirecthigh218.10.2
ip-address10.2.0indirectmoderate710.7.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.