Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-23 18:47 UTC

interactivethings / catalog

Create living style guides using Markdown or React

JavaScript · TypeScriptBSD-3-Clause★ 1,601 stars⑂ 140 forkssince Jul 2014archivedView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

interactivethings/catalog holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (74/100) and lowest on Vitality (28/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Interactive ThingsOrganization
28 followers50 public repossince Jun 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@catalog/cli0.0.549132823 days agostyleguidestyle-guidedocsdocumentationreactmarkdown
npm@catalog/core0.0.51,764132823 days agostyleguidestyle-guidedocsdocumentationreactmarkdown
npmcatalog⚠ Package no longer supported. Contact Support at https://www.npmjs.com/support for more info.3.6.22,6191451883 days agostyleguidestyle-guidedocsdocumentationreactmarkdown
npm@catalog/standalone0.0.537112823 days ago
npm@catalog/babel-preset0.0.54182823 days ago
npm@catalog/markdown-loader0.0.53582823 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

28At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recencylast push 286 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18Commit volume1 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year1
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push286
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases17 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 2,725 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~38.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tagv4.0.1-canary.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2,725
mean_days_between_releases38.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

71Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
52/60Stars1,601 stars
17.9/25Forks140 forks
2.7/15Watchers4 watchers
Inputs used
forks140
stars1,601
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
48.8/80Monthly downloads4,545 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@catalog/cli, @catalog/core, catalog, @catalog/standalone, @catalog/babel-preset, @catalog/markdown-loader
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads4,545
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 67% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth22 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled22
top_contributor_share0.669
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
13.2/30PR acceptance120/272 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs120
open_issues0
closed_issues291
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs152
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
10.5/25Owner reach28 followers of interactivethings
24.4/25Track record50 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers28
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logininteractivethings
public_repos50
account_age_days5,868
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable6 package(s) on npm
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 1,883 days ago
20/20Version history145 published versions
0/20Not deprecatedcatalog: Package no longer supported. Contact Support at https://www.npmjs.com/support for more info.
Inputs used
packages@catalog/cli, @catalog/core, catalog, @catalog/standalone, @catalog/babel-preset, @catalog/markdown-loader
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedyes
min_days_since_publish1,883

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.catalog.style/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsreact, catalog, styleguide, docs, documentation, style-guide, markdown, documentation-tool
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.catalog.style/
docs_sitehttps://www.catalog.style/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

30At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject is archived
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities217 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
9.3/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories4 affected: d3-color 1.4.1 (high), marked 0.4.0 (high 7.5), webpack-dev-server 2.11.5 (high 7.5), +1 more
0.9/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories30 affected: babel-traverse 6.26.0 (critical 9.3), eventsource 0.1.6 (critical 9.3), loader-utils 0.2.17 (critical 9.8), +27 more
5.8/40No advisories left outstanding33 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,925 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories73
affected_packages34
assessed_packages973
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 4, high 22, moderate 8
direct_affected_packages4
Matched the npm:catalog@3.6.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 973 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
20.1/40Legible commit history37 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.378
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile, packages/core/Makefile, packages/standalone/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.json
11/11Static type checkingdocs/tsconfig.json, packages/babel-preset/tsconfig.json, packages/catalog/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/core/types/catalog/tsconfig.json, packages/markdown-loader/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentNix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, packages/core/Makefile, packages/standalone/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdocs/tsconfig.json, packages/babel-preset/tsconfig.json, packages/catalog/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/core/types/catalog/tsconfig.json, packages/markdown-loader/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript with type-check config (docs/tsconfig.json, packages/babel-preset/tsconfig.json, packages/catalog/tsconfig.json, packages/cli/tsconfig.json, packages/core/types/catalog/tsconfig.json, packages/markdown-loader/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes1/117 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes5,095,388
source_files_sampled117
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

1,601GitHub stars
22contributors
1commits, last 12 months
286days since last push
17releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 140 ⇿
0Stars
140Forks
16Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012515013752016-072021-022025-10
Major 0Minor 5Patch 9

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-23 18:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities217 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 43
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@catalog/core^4.0.1-canary.2packages/catalog/package.json
npm@babel/core^7.2.2packages/cli/package.json
npm@catalog/babel-preset^4.0.1-canary.2packages/cli/package.json
npm@catalog/core^4.0.1-canary.2packages/cli/package.json
npm@catalog/markdown-loader^4.0.1-canary.2packages/cli/package.json
npmargs^5.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npmbabel-loader^8.0.5packages/cli/package.json
npmbabel-preset-react-app^9.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npmchalk^2.1.0packages/cli/package.json
npmcss-loader^2.1.1packages/cli/package.json
npmexpress^4.16.3packages/cli/package.json
npmfile-loader^4.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npmfriendly-errors-webpack-plugin^1.6.1packages/cli/package.json
npmhtml-webpack-plugin^4.0.0-beta.5packages/cli/package.json
npmmini-css-extract-plugin^0.7.0packages/cli/package.json
npmpostcss-flexbugs-fixes^4.1.0packages/cli/package.json
npmpostcss-loader^3.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npmpostcss-preset-env^6.5.0packages/cli/package.json
npmreact-app-polyfill^1.0.1packages/cli/package.json
npmreact-dev-utils^9.0.1packages/cli/package.json
npmsander^0.6.0packages/cli/package.json
npmsass-loader^7.1.0packages/cli/package.json
npmstyle-loader^0.23.1packages/cli/package.json
npmterser-webpack-plugin^1.2.2packages/cli/package.json
npmurl-loader^2.0.0packages/cli/package.json
npmwebpack^4.29.1packages/cli/package.json
npmwebpack-dev-server^3.1.14packages/cli/package.json
npmwebpack-manifest-plugin^2.0.4packages/cli/package.json
npmcreate-emotion^10.0.9packages/core/package.json
npmd3-color^1.1.0packages/core/package.json
npmgithub-slugger^1.1.3packages/core/package.json
npmhistory^3.2.1packages/core/package.json
npmjs-yaml^3.9.1packages/core/package.json
npmmarked^0.4.0packages/core/package.json
npmprismjs^1.14.0packages/core/package.json
npmprop-types^15.7.2packages/core/package.json
npmraf^3.3.2packages/core/package.json
npmramda^0.25.0packages/core/package.json
npmreact-document-title^2.0.3packages/core/package.json
npmreact-router^3.2.0packages/core/package.json
npmreact-router-scroll^0.4.2packages/core/package.json
npmsrcset^2.0.0packages/core/package.json
npmurl^0.11.0packages/core/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 34

Installing npm:catalog@3.6.2 pulls in 973 packages, direct and transitive: 34 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
babel-traverse6.26.0indirectcritical18.0.0-alpha.4
eventsource0.1.6indirectcritical12.0.2
loader-utils0.2.17indirectcritical12.0.3
shell-quote1.6.1indirectcritical21.9.0
d3-color1.4.1directhigh13.1.0
marked0.4.0directhigh44.0.10
webpack-dev-server2.11.5directhigh75.2.6
ansi-html0.0.7indirecthigh10.0.8
braces2.3.2indirecthigh13.0.3
cross-spawn5.1.0indirecthigh17.0.5
elliptic6.6.1indirecthigh1
html-minifier3.5.21indirecthigh1
http-proxy-middleware0.19.2indirecthigh24.1.0
ip1.1.9indirecthigh1
is-svg2.1.0indirecthigh24.3.0
js-yaml3.7.0indirecthigh54.3.0
json50.5.1indirecthigh12.2.2
mime1.3.6indirecthigh12.0.3
minimatch3.0.3indirecthigh410.2.3
node-forge0.10.0indirecthigh131.4.0
postcss5.2.18indirecthigh48.5.12
postcss6.0.23indirecthigh48.5.12
tmp0.0.33indirecthigh20.2.6
trim-newlines1.0.0indirecthigh14.0.1
uuid3.4.0indirecthigh113.0.1
webpack-dev-middleware1.12.2indirecthigh17.1.0
react-dev-utils4.2.3directmoderate111.0.4
ajv5.5.2indirectmoderate28.18.0
color-string0.3.0indirectmoderate11.5.5
mem1.1.0indirectmoderate14.0.0
micromatch3.1.10indirectmoderate14.0.8
sockjs0.3.19indirectmoderate10.3.20
yargs-parser4.2.1indirectmoderate118.1.1
yargs-parser7.0.0indirectmoderate118.1.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.