Public record
Software health reportschema 0.18.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 08:48 UTC

j0k3r / graby

Graby helps you extract article content from web pages

PHPMIT★ 388 stars⑂ 76 forkssince May 2015View on GitHub ↗

j0k3r/graby holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (74/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (31/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jérémy BenoistPersonal account
280 followers65 public repossince Mar 2009@20Minutes

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistj0k3r/graby2.5.26,6439613 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence9/52 weeks with commits
14.4/18Commit volume39 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained22 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year39
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year9
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases96 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 13 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~179.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count96
latest_release_tag2.5.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release13
mean_days_between_releases179.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
42/60Stars388 stars
15.6/25Forks76 forks
6.7/15Watchers17 watchers
Inputs used
forks76
stars388
watchers17
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51/80Monthly downloads6,643 downloads/month across packagist
3.2/20Registry dependents2 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesj0k3r/graby
dependents2
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads374,122
monthly_downloads6,643
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 77% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth20 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled20
top_contributor_share0.774
How it's scored
32.3/42Issue resolution77% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance245/264 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs245
open_issues29
closed_issues96
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.768
closed_unmerged_prs19
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
17.6/25Owner reach280 followers of j0k3r
25/25Track record65 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers280
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginj0k3r
public_repos65
account_age_days6,340
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 13 days ago
20/20Version history96 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesj0k3r/graby
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish13

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstext-rss, php, extract-website, content, readability, composer, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained22 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

31At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.php
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
53.1/55Manageable file sizes1/29 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes67,563
source_files_sampled29
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

388GitHub stars
20contributors
39commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
96releases
1bus factor
29open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 388 ★ / 76 ⇿
388Stars
76Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040038875102015-052020-112026-06

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 08:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 6/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained22 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistfossar/htmlawed^1.3.3composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr7^2.0composer.json
Packagistj0k3r/graby-site-config^1.0.181composer.json
Packagistj0k3r/httplug-ssrf-plugin^3.0composer.json
Packagistj0k3r/php-readability^1.3composer.json
Packagistmonolog/monolog^3.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-client-implementation^1.0composer.json
Packagistsimplepie/simplepie^1.8composer.json
Packagistsmalot/pdfparser^2.8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver^5.4|^6.4|^7.3|^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn^1.26composer.json
All dependencies 29

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 18 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistfossar/htmlaweddirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr7direct
Packagistj0k3r/graby-site-configdirect
Packagistj0k3r/httplug-ssrf-plugindirect
Packagistj0k3r/php-readabilitydirect
Packagistmonolog/monologdirect
Packagistpsr/http-client-implementationdirect
Packagistsimplepie/simplepiedirect
Packagistsmalot/pdfparserdirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolverdirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idndirect
Packagistext-curlindirect
Packagistext-tidyindirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixerindirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzleindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphp-http/client-commonindirect
Packagistphp-http/discoveryindirect
Packagistphp-http/guzzle7-adapterindirect
Packagistphp-http/httplugindirect
Packagistphp-http/messageindirect
Packagistphp-http/mock-clientindirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installerindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rulesindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunitindirect
Packagistrector/rectorindirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystemindirect
Packagistsymfony/phpunit-bridgeindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.18.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.