Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 16:54 UTC

janosmiko / lfk

⚡ LFK is a lightning-fast, keyboard-focused, yazi-inspired terminal user interface for navigating and managing Kubernetes clusters. Built for speed and efficiency, it brings a three-column Miller columns layout with an owner-based resource hierarchy to your terminal.

GoApache-2.0★ 699 stars⑂ 25 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindTerminal interfaceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

janosmiko/lfk holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (89/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (62/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Janos MikoPersonal account
28 followers90 public repossince Mar 2011

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/janosmiko/lfkv0.15.8-1430 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume925 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year925
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.5 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.15.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

67Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
46.1/60Stars699 stars
11.5/25Forks25 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks25
stars699
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 87% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth12 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled12
top_contributor_share0.869
How it's scored
41.2/42Issue resolution98% of issues closed
28.6/30PR acceptance413/433 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs413
open_issues2
closed_issues99
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.98
closed_unmerged_prs20
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
10.5/25Owner reach28 followers of janosmiko
25/25Track record90 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers28
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginjanosmiko
public_repos90
account_age_days5,589
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history143 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/janosmiko/lfk
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsk8s, kubectl, kubernetes, tui
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

83Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

83Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
1.2/2.5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Passing
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate8.3

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

89Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,961
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes11/1,135 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes170,902
source_files_sampled1,135
oversized_source_files11

Key facts

699GitHub stars
12contributors
925commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.3 / 10
8.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 16:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Passing
0Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/atotto/clipboardv0.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.3.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.11.7go.mod
Gogithub.com/creack/ptyv1.1.24go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/gopacketv1.1.19go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/shlexv0.0.0-20191202100458-e7afc7fbc510go.mod
Gogithub.com/hinshun/vt10xv0.0.0-20220301184237-5011da428d02go.mod
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenvv0.16.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiv0.36.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.36.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.36.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/klog/v2v2.140.0go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.6.0go.mod
All dependencies 82

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 62 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/atotto/clipboardv0.1.4direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.3.10direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.11.7direct
Gogithub.com/creack/ptyv1.1.24direct
Gogithub.com/google/gopacketv1.1.19direct
Gogithub.com/google/shlexv0.0.0-20191202100458-e7afc7fbc510direct
Gogithub.com/hinshun/vt10xv0.0.0-20220301184237-5011da428d02direct
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenvv0.16.0direct
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gok8s.io/apiv0.36.2direct
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.36.2direct
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.36.2direct
Gok8s.io/klog/v2v2.140.0direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2v2.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/cellbufv0.0.15indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/displaywidthv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3v3.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/erikgeiser/coninputv0.0.0-20211004153227-1c3628e74d0findirect
Gogithub.com/fxamacker/cbor/v2v2.9.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointerv0.23.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreferencev0.21.6indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swagv0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag/cmdutilsv0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag/convv0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag/fileutilsv0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag/jsonnamev0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag/jsonutilsv0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag/loadingv0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag/manglingv0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag/netutilsv0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag/stringutilsv0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag/typeutilsv0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag/yamlutilsv0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/google/btreev1.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic-modelsv0.7.1indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/gov1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/textv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.22indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-localereaderv0.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.24indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrentv0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect2v1.0.3-0.20250322232337-35a7c28c31eeindirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/ansiv0.0.0-20230316100256-276c6243b2f6indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/cancelreaderv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautonegv0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/peterbourgon/diskvv2.0.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/x448/float16v0.8.4indirect
Gogithub.com/xo/terminfov0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41eindirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v2v2.4.4indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.56.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.46.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.44.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.12-0.20260120151049-f2248ac996afindirect
Gogopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v4v4.13.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v0v0.9.1indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapiv0.0.0-20260603220949-865597e52e25indirect
Gok8s.io/utilsv0.0.0-20260507154919-ff6756f316d2indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/jsonv0.0.0-20250730193827-2d320260d730indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/randfillv1.0.0indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v6v6.4.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.