Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 09:07 UTC

jawah / qh3

Lightweight QUIC and HTTP/3 implementation in Python. ECH & PQ Ready.

Python · RustBSD-3-Clause★ 46 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Jun 2023forkView on GitHub ↗

#asyncio #http3 #http3-client #http3-server #quic #ech #pq

jawah/qh3 holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (47/100). It was last updated 21 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

JawahOrganization

40 followers10 public repossince Jul 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
PyPI	qh3	1.9.4	2,315,407	54	40 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

69Good

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 21 days ago
12.5/36	Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 175 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	175
human_commit_share	0.96
days_since_last_push	21
active_weeks_last_year	18

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 54 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 40 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~9.3 days
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.

Inputs used

releases_count	54
latest_release_tag	v1.9.4
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	40
mean_days_between_releases	9.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

34At Risk

How it's scored

26.8/60	Stars — 46 stars
7/25	Forks — 8 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	8
stars	46
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	no
has_license	no
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 2,315,407 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	qh3
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	2,315,407
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 70% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 28 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	28
top_contributor_share	0.698

Issue & PR responsiveness

74Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
20.5/30	PR acceptance — 91/133 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	91
open_issues	0
closed_issues	12
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	42
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

69Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
11.6/25	Owner reach — 40 followers of jawah
13.8/25	Track record — 10 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	40
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	jawah
public_repos	10
account_age_days	1,139

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 40 days ago
20/20	Version history — 54 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	qh3
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	40

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
10/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

0/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://qh3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
0/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	asyncio, http3, http3-client, http3-server, quic, ech, pq
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://qh3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
docs_site	https://qh3.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
has_readme	no
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

69Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
1.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 4 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
7.5/7.5	Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 11 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	6.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

54Moderate

How it's scored

10.6/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 5 affected: pyo3 0.28.3 (high 7.5), rsa 0.9.10 (moderate 5.9), rand 0.8.5 (low), +2 more
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
30.2/40	No advisories left outstanding — 4 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,003 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	9
affected_packages	5
assessed_packages	182
unassessed_packages	10
affected_by_severity	high 1, moderate 1, low 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages	5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 182 resolved dependencies against OSV. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 86 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.896
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

88Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile, noxfile.py
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — qh3/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	docs/Makefile, noxfile.py
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	qh3/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.04

Code legibility for models

78Good

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (qh3/py.typed)
50.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 6/74 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	171,068
source_files_sampled	74
oversized_source_files	6

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

46GitHub stars

28contributors

175commits, last 12 months

21days since last push

54releases

1bus factor

0open issues

crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Community profile unavailable
Could not fetch crates package 'qh3' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿

0Stars

8Forks

46Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 13Patch 32

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10

6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 09:07 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
5	CI-Tests	4 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 1/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
8	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
10	Signed-Releases	5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0	Vulnerabilities	11 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 20

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	pyo3	`0.28.2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	ls-qpack-rs	`0.3.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rustls	`0.23.25`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	x509-parser	`0.18.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rsa	`0.9.8`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	dsa	`0.6.3`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	ed25519-dalek	`2.1.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rand	`=0.8.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pkcs8	`0.10.2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pkcs1	`0.7.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rustls-pemfile	`2.2.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	aws-lc-rs	`1.14.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	x509-ocsp	`0.2.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	x509-cert	`0.2.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	der	`=0.7.10`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	sha1	`0.10.6`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1.0.219`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	bincode	`=1.3.3`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	idna	`1.1.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	quinn-udp	`0.6.1`	Cargo.toml

All dependencies 192

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 20 direct and 172 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	aws-lc-rs	`1.17.1`	direct
crates.io	bincode	`1.3.3`	direct
crates.io	der	`0.7.10`	direct
crates.io	dsa	`0.6.3`	direct
crates.io	ed25519-dalek	`2.2.0`	direct
crates.io	idna	`1.1.0`	direct
crates.io	ls-qpack-rs	`0.3.2`	direct
crates.io	pkcs1	`0.7.5`	direct
crates.io	pkcs8	`0.10.2`	direct
crates.io	pyo3	`0.28.3`	direct
crates.io	quinn-udp	`0.6.1`	direct
crates.io	rand	`0.8.5`	direct
crates.io	rsa	`0.9.10`	direct
crates.io	rustls	`0.23.41`	direct
crates.io	rustls-pemfile	`2.2.0`	direct
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	direct
crates.io	sha1	`0.10.7`	direct
crates.io	x509-cert	`0.2.5`	direct
crates.io	x509-ocsp	`0.2.1`	direct
crates.io	x509-parser	`0.18.1`	direct
crates.io	aes	`0.8.4`	indirect
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	asn1-rs	`0.7.2`	indirect
crates.io	asn1-rs-derive	`0.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	asn1-rs-impl	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	aws-lc-fips-sys	`0.13.15`	indirect
crates.io	aws-lc-sys	`0.42.0`	indirect
crates.io	base64ct	`1.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	bindgen	`0.72.1`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.10.4`	indirect
crates.io	block-padding	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	cbc	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.67`	indirect
crates.io	cexpr	`0.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	cfg_aliases	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	cipher	`0.4.4`	indirect
crates.io	clang-sys	`1.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	cmake	`0.1.58`	indirect
crates.io	const-oid	`0.9.6`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-common	`0.1.7`	indirect
crates.io	curve25519-dalek	`4.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	curve25519-dalek-derive	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	data-encoding	`2.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	der-parser	`10.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	der_derive	`0.7.3`	indirect
crates.io	deranged	`0.5.8`	indirect
crates.io	digest	`0.10.7`	indirect
crates.io	displaydoc	`0.2.6`	indirect
crates.io	dunce	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	ed25519	`2.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.16.0`	indirect
crates.io	fiat-crypto	`0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	flagset	`0.4.7`	indirect
crates.io	fs_extra	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	generic-array	`0.14.7`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	glob	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	hmac	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	icu_collections	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_locale_core	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer_data	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties_data	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_provider	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna_adapter	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	inout	`0.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	itertools	`0.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	jobserver	`0.1.35`	indirect
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.186`	indirect
crates.io	libloading	`0.8.9`	indirect
crates.io	libm	`0.2.16`	indirect
crates.io	litemap	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.33`	indirect
crates.io	ls-qpack-rs-sys	`0.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	minimal-lexical	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	nom	`7.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	num-bigint	`0.4.8`	indirect
crates.io	num-bigint-dig	`0.8.6`	indirect
crates.io	num-conv	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	num-integer	`0.1.46`	indirect
crates.io	num-iter	`0.1.46`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	indirect
crates.io	oid-registry	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	pbkdf2	`0.12.2`	indirect
crates.io	pem-rfc7468	`0.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	pkcs5	`0.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	pkg-config	`0.3.33`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	potential_utf	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	powerfmt	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.21`	indirect
crates.io	prettyplease	`0.2.37`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-build-config	`0.28.3`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-ffi	`0.28.3`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros	`0.28.3`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros-backend	`0.28.3`	indirect
crates.io	python3-dll-a	`0.2.15`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.46`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`6.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.15`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.11`	indirect
crates.io	rfc6979	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	ring	`0.17.14`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-hash	`2.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	rustc_version	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	rusticata-macros	`4.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-pki-types	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-webpki	`0.103.13`	indirect
crates.io	salsa20	`0.10.2`	indirect
crates.io	scrypt	`0.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	semver	`1.0.28`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	sha2	`0.10.9`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	signature	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.15.2`	indirect
crates.io	socket2	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	spin	`0.9.8`	indirect
crates.io	spki	`0.7.3`	indirect
crates.io	stable_deref_trait	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	subtle	`2.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.118`	indirect
crates.io	synstructure	`0.13.2`	indirect
crates.io	target-lexicon	`0.13.5`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	time	`0.3.53`	indirect
crates.io	time-core	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	time-macros	`0.2.31`	indirect
crates.io	tinystr	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	tls_codec	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	tls_codec_derive	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	tracing	`0.1.44`	indirect
crates.io	tracing-core	`0.1.36`	indirect
crates.io	typenum	`1.20.1`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	untrusted	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	utf8_iter	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.52.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	writeable	`0.6.3`	indirect
crates.io	yoke	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	yoke-derive	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.8.54`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.8.54`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom	`0.1.8`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom-derive	`0.1.7`	indirect
crates.io	zeroize	`1.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	zeroize_derive	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	zerotrie	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec	`0.11.6`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec-derive	`0.11.3`	indirect
PyPI	brotli	`—`	indirect
PyPI	brotlicffi	`—`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`—`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`—`	indirect
PyPI	dnspython	`—`	indirect
PyPI	maturin	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-mock	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autodoc-typehints	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 182 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 5 are direct. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
pyo3	`0.28.3`	direct	high	4	`0.29.0`
rsa	`0.9.10`	direct	moderate	1	—
rand	`0.8.5`	direct	low	2	`0.10.1`
bincode	`1.3.3`	direct	unknown	1	—
rustls-pemfile	`2.2.0`	direct	unknown	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records