Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-06 20:04 UTC

jfeltkamp / cookiesjsr

Easily expandable cookie consent tool.

JavaScript · Svelte · SCSSCustom license★ 27 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Jun 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

jfeltkamp/cookiesjsr holds a health index of 26 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (44/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (21/100). It was last updated 122 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

26
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

26
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 36 is calibrated to 30 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Joachim FeltkampPersonal account
1 follower17 public repossince Dec 2012Factorial

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmcookiesjsr1.0.1783651470 days ago—
Packagistjfeltkamp/cookiesjsr2.0.624,55318293 days agousercookiesopen-sourceeulegaleuropeconsentpersonal-datagdprdsgvodata-protectiondata-privacythird-partylgpdccpapersonal-informationonetrustcookie-compliancecompliance-tool

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

29At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

15Critical
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 122 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
4.3/18Commit volume — 2 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year2
human_commit_share0.985
days_since_last_push122
active_weeks_last_year1

Release discipline

50Moderate
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 28 version tags (no GitHub releases)
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 293 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~175.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count28
latest_release_tag2.0.6
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release293
mean_days_between_releases175.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

30At Risk
How it's scored
23/60Stars — 27 stars
6.5/25Forks — 7 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars27
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

44Weak
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate
How it's scored
58.7/80Monthly downloads — 25,389 downloads/month across npm, packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagescookiesjsr, jfeltkamp/cookiesjsr
dependents0
ecosystemsnpm, packagist
total_downloads908,076
monthly_downloads25,389
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

44Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

46Weak
How it's scored
33.8/42Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
6/30PR acceptance — 3/15 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs3
open_issues8
closed_issues33
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.805
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

42Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of jfeltkamp
21.1/25Track record — 17 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginjfeltkamp
public_repos17
account_age_days4,987
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

91Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, packagist
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 293 days ago
20/20Version history — 18 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescookiesjsr, jfeltkamp/cookiesjsr
ecosystemsnpm, packagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish293

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

21At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

29At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 41 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate2.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories43
affected_packages13
assessed_packages144
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 5, high 5, moderate 1, low 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 144 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

15Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.8/40Legible commit history — 18 of 65 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.277
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

32At Risk
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — jsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 66
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 66 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsjsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.015
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (jsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/12 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes6,971
source_files_sampled12
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

27GitHub stars
1contributors
2commits, last 12 months
122days since last push
28releases
1bus factor
8open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7 ⇿
0Stars
7Forks
8Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1234567712021-092023-112026-01
Major 1Minor 0Patch 7

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.9 / 10
2.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-06 20:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities41 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 144

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 144 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.25.11indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.25.11indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@parcel/watcher2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-android-arm642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-arm642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-x642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-freebsd-x642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-glibc2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-musl2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-glibc2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-musl2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-glibc2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-musl2.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-arm642.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-ia322.5.1indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-x642.5.1indirect
npm@polka/url1.0.0-next.29indirect
npm@publint/pack0.1.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.52.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.52.4indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.0.0indirect
npm@sveltejs/acorn-typescript1.0.6indirect
npm@sveltejs/adapter-auto7.0.0indirect
npm@sveltejs/kit2.47.1indirect
npm@sveltejs/package2.5.4indirect
npm@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte6.2.1indirect
npm@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte-inspector5.0.1indirect
npm@types/cookie0.6.0indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npmacorn8.15.0indirect
npmaria-query5.3.2indirect
npmaxobject-query4.1.0indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbuildify0.4.0indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmclean-css0.6.0indirect
npmclsx2.1.1indirect
npmcookie0.6.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdedent-js1.0.1indirect
npmdeepmerge4.3.1indirect
npmdetect-libc1.0.3indirect
npmdevalue5.4.1indirect
npmesbuild0.25.11indirect
npmesm-env1.2.2indirect
npmesrap2.1.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmimmutable5.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-reference3.0.3indirect
npmkleur4.1.5indirect
npmlocate-character3.0.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.19indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmkdirp0.3.2indirect
npmmri1.2.0indirect
npmmrmime2.0.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.11indirect
npmncp2.0.0indirect
npmnode-addon-api7.1.1indirect
npmoptimist0.3.7indirect
npmpackage-manager-detector1.4.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.3indirect
npmpostcss8.5.6indirect
npmpublint0.3.14indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmrollup4.52.4indirect
npmsade1.8.1indirect
npmsass1.93.2indirect
npmscule1.3.0indirect
npmsemver7.7.3indirect
npmset-cookie-parser2.7.1indirect
npmsirv3.0.2indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsvelte5.40.2indirect
npmsvelte-preprocess-filter1.0.0indirect
npmsvelte-preprocess-sass2.0.1indirect
npmsvelte2tsx0.7.45indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.15indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtotalist3.0.1indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmuglify-js1.3.4indirect
npmunderscore1.3.3indirect
npmvite7.1.10indirect
npmvitefu1.1.1indirect
npmwordwrap0.0.3indirect
npmzimmerframe1.1.4indirect
Dependency advisories 13

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 144 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 13 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
@sveltejs/kit2.47.1indirectcritical65.5.1
immutable5.1.4indirectcritical35.1.8
rollup4.52.4indirectcritical14.59.0
uglify-js1.3.4indirectcritical22.7.2
underscore1.3.3indirectcritical21.13.8
devalue5.4.1indirecthigh65.6.4
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
picomatch4.0.3indirecthigh24.0.4
postcss8.5.6indirecthigh48.5.23
vite7.1.10indirecthigh68.0.16
svelte5.40.2indirectmoderate75.55.7
clean-css0.6.0indirectlow14.1.11
cookie0.6.0indirectlow10.7.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with jfeltkamp/cookiesjsr. Read them side by side →

81scify/laravel-cookie-guardA Laravel package that provides a Cookies consent floating window and publishes the Cookies for all consent categoriesExcellent89databuddy-analytics/DatabuddyDatabuddy is a privacy-first analytics platform with a focus on user experience, with it's foundation built on privacy, it ensures complete compliance with most major data privacy laws out of the boxExcellent83michelonsouza/encrypt-storageEncryptStorage provide a little more security in frontendExcellent96licensee/licenseeA Ruby Gem to detect under what license a project is distributed.Exceptional88datafog/datafog-pythonOffline PII firewall for AI agents and LLM apps: fast local detection and redaction, Claude Code hook, LiteLLM guardrail. Zero network calls, one dependency.Excellent98swagger-api/swagger-uiSwagger UI is a collection of HTML, JavaScript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation from a Swagger-compliant API.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, Packagist.