Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 02:29 UTC

joerick / pyinstrument

🚴 Call stack profiler for Python. Shows you why your code is slow!

Python · TypeScript · SvelteBSD-3-Clause★ 8,005 stars⑂ 299 forkssince Mar 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#python#django#profiler#performance#profile#async

joerick/pyinstrument holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Security (62/100). It was last updated 23 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Joe RickerbyPersonal account
252 followers88 public repossince Dec 2011Nord Projects

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIpyinstrument5.1.39,984,1095629 days agoprofilingprofileprofilercputimesampling

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

69Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 23 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
17.5/18Commit volume — 87 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year87
human_commit_share0.87
days_since_last_push23
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 15 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 29 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~80.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv5.1.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release29
mean_days_between_releases80.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

78Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

90Excellent
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 8,005 stars
20.6/25Forks — 299 forks
9.3/15Watchers — 49 watchers
Inputs used
forks299
stars8,005
watchers49
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 9,984,109 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespyinstrument
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads9,984,109
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

37Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 81% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 64 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 50 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled64
top_contributor_share0.811

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
36.8/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
21.6/30PR acceptance — 184/255 decided PRs merged
4.3/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs184
open_issues24
closed_issues170
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio0.876
closed_unmerged_prs71
first_time_authors_30d5
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d6

Ownership & stewardship

65Good
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
17.3/25Owner reach — 252 followers of joerick
25/25Track record — 88 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers252
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginjoerick
public_repos88
account_age_days5,378
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 29 days ago
20/20Version history — 56 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespyinstrument
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish29

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.isort])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://pyinstrument.readthedocs.io/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspython, django, profiler, performance, profile, async
has_wikino
homepagehttps://pyinstrument.readthedocs.io/
docs_sitehttps://pyinstrument.readthedocs.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 50 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 48 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories48
affected_packages12
assessed_packages193
unassessed_packages13
affected_by_severitycritical 3, high 7, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 193 resolved dependencies against OSV. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

32At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32.5/40Legible commit history — 53 of 87 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.609
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

82Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile, noxfile.py
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.isort])
11/11Static type checking — html_renderer/tsconfig.json, pyinstrument/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 11 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile, noxfile.py
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configshtml_renderer/tsconfig.json, pyinstrument/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.11

Code legibility for models

80Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (html_renderer/tsconfig.json, pyinstrument/py.typed)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes — 4/120 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes950,319
source_files_sampled120
oversized_source_files4

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8,005GitHub stars
64contributors
87commits, last 12 months
23days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
24open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 299 ⇿
0Stars
299Forks
15Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

050100150200250300297182014-042020-062026-08
Major 1Minor 4Patch 10

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 02:29 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 2/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 50 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities48 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmsvelte-persisted-store^0.11.0html_renderer/package.json
All dependencies 206

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 205 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmsvelte-persisted-store0.11.0direct
npm@ampproject/remapping2.3.0indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.21.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/set-array1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.25indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-powerpc64le-gnu4.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.19.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.19.2indirect
npm@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte3.1.1indirect
npm@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte-inspector2.1.0indirect
npm@tsconfig/svelte5.0.4indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.5indirect
npm@types/pug2.0.10indirect
npm@vitest/expect2.0.5indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format2.0.5indirect
npm@vitest/runner2.0.5indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot2.0.5indirect
npm@vitest/spy2.0.5indirect
npm@vitest/utils2.0.5indirect
npmacorn8.12.1indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmaria-query5.3.0indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmaxobject-query4.1.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.3.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbuffer-crc321.0.0indirect
npmcac6.7.14indirect
npmchai5.1.1indirect
npmcheck-error2.1.1indirect
npmchokidar3.6.0indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcode-red1.0.4indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.3indirect
npmcss-tree2.3.1indirect
npmdebug4.3.6indirect
npmdeep-eql5.0.2indirect
npmdeepmerge4.3.1indirect
npmdefine-lazy-prop2.0.0indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdetect-indent6.1.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmes6-promise3.3.1indirect
npmesbuild0.21.5indirect
npmescalade3.1.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexeca8.0.1indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-func-name2.0.2indirect
npmget-stream8.0.1indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhuman-signals5.0.0indirect
npmimmutable4.3.7indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-docker2.2.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-reference3.0.2indirect
npmis-stream3.0.0indirect
npmis-wsl2.2.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmkleur4.1.5indirect
npmlocate-character3.0.0indirect
npmloupe3.1.1indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.11indirect
npmmdn-data2.0.30indirect
npmmerge-stream2.0.0indirect
npmmimic-fn4.0.0indirect
npmmin-indent1.0.1indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmmkdirp0.5.6indirect
npmmri1.2.0indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmnanoid3.3.7indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmnpm-run-path5.3.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmonetime6.0.0indirect
npmopen8.4.2indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-key4.0.0indirect
npmpathe1.1.2indirect
npmpathval2.0.0indirect
npmperiscopic3.1.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpostcss8.4.40indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmrimraf2.7.1indirect
npmrollup4.19.2indirect
npmrollup-plugin-visualizer5.12.0indirect
npmsade1.8.1indirect
npmsander0.5.1indirect
npmsass1.77.8indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmsorcery0.11.1indirect
npmsource-map0.7.4indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.0indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env3.7.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-final-newline3.0.0indirect
npmstrip-indent3.0.0indirect
npmsvelte4.2.18indirect
npmsvelte-check3.8.5indirect
npmsvelte-hmr0.16.0indirect
npmsvelte-preprocess5.1.4indirect
npmsvelte-preprocess6.0.2indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinypool1.0.0indirect
npmtinyrainbow1.2.0indirect
npmtinyspy3.0.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.6.3indirect
npmtypescript5.5.4indirect
npmvite5.3.5indirect
npmvite-node2.0.5indirect
npmvitefu0.2.5indirect
npmvitest2.0.5indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
PyPIcffi—indirect
PyPIclick—indirect
PyPIdjango—indirect
PyPIflaky—indirect
PyPIfuro2024.7.18indirect
PyPIgreenlet—indirect
PyPIipython—indirect
PyPIlitestar—indirect
PyPImyst-parser3.0.1indirect
PyPInox—indirect
PyPInumpy—indirect
PyPIprek—indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio0.23.8indirect
PyPIsphinx7.4.7indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2024.4.16indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-programoutput0.17indirect
PyPItrio—indirect
PyPItyping-extensions—indirect
Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 193 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
immutable4.3.7indirectcritical35.1.8
rollup4.19.2indirectcritical24.59.0
vitest2.0.5indirectcritical24.1.0
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh55.0.9
cross-spawn7.0.3indirecthigh17.0.5
minimatch3.1.2indirecthigh310.2.3
nanoid3.3.7indirecthigh35.1.16
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
postcss8.4.40indirecthigh48.5.23
vite5.3.5indirecthigh158.0.16
esbuild0.21.5indirectmoderate10.25.0
svelte4.2.18indirectmoderate75.55.7

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with joerick/pyinstrument. Read them side by side →

98strawberry-graphql/strawberryA GraphQL library for Python that leverages type annotations 🍓Exceptional100DataDog/dd-trace-jsDatadog APM client for Node.jsExceptional98grafana/pyroscopeContinuous Profiling Platform. Debug performance issues down to a single line of codeExceptional99wagtail/wagtailA Django content management system focused on flexibility and user experienceExceptional98valkey-io/valkey-glideAn open source Valkey client library that supports Valkey, and Redis open source 6.2, 7.0 and 7.2. Valkey GLIDE is designed for reliability, optimized performance, and high-availability, for Valkey and Redis OSS based applications. GLIDE is a multi language client library, written in Rust with programming language bindings, such as Java and PythonExceptional98django/djangoThe Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.