Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 06:34 UTC

jolicode / JoliTypo

🔤 Microtypography fixer for the web

PHP · HTML · CSSMIT★ 351 stars⑂ 29 forkssince Dec 2012View on GitHub ↗

jolicode/JoliTypo holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (74/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (48/100). It was last updated 14 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

JoliCodeOrganization · verified domain
145 followers101 public repossince Feb 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistjolicode/jolitypov1.7.013,29619169 days agotypographyquoteellipsisfixersmartquote

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

56Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 14 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
12.2/18Commit volume — 22 commits in the last year
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
commits_last_year22
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push14
active_weeks_last_year8
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 17 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 169 days ago
5.4/27Release cadence — a release every ~399.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tagv1.7.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release169
mean_days_between_releases399.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
41.3/60Stars — 351 stars
12.1/25Forks — 29 forks
8/15Watchers — 29 watchers
Inputs used
forks29
stars351
watchers29
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesposer.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
55/80Monthly downloads — 13,296 downloads/month across packagist
5.6/20Registry dependents — 6 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesjolicode/jolitypo
dependents6
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,130,327
monthly_downloads13,296
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 62% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 22 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled22
top_contributor_share0.617
How it's scored
32.7/42Issue resolution — 78% of issues closed
28.1/30PR acceptance — 76/81 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs76
open_issues10
closed_issues35
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.778
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
15.6/25Owner reach — 145 followers of jolicode
25/25Track record — 101 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers145
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginjolicode
public_repos101
account_age_days5,327

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 169 days ago
20/20Version history — 19 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesjolicode/jolitypo
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish169

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://jolitypo.jolicode.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstypography, microtypography, php, microtypography-fixer, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepagehttps://jolitypo.jolicode.com/
docs_sitehttps://jolitypo.jolicode.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 13 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 5/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
5.2/7.5Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages77
unassessed_packages11
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 77 resolved dependencies against OSV. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
29.4/40Legible commit history — 53 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.552
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/61 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes15,761
source_files_sampled61
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

351GitHub stars
22contributors
22commits, last 12 months
14days since last push
17releases
1bus factor
10open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch packagist package 'jolicode/jolitypo-website' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 29 ⇿
0Stars
29Forks
17Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025302722013-052019-122026-06
Major 0Minor 8Patch 7

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 06:34 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests13 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 5/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
7Maintained9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistorg_heigl/hyphenator^2.6 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistjolicode/jolitypodev-main@devwebsite/composer.json
Packagistsoyuka/php-wasmdev-main@devwebsite/composer.json
All dependencies 88

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 84 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistjolicode/jolitypo—direct
Packagistorg_heigl/hyphenator—direct
Packagistorg_heigl/hyphenator3.1.0direct
Packagistsoyuka/php-wasm—direct
Packagistamphp/amp3.1.2indirect
Packagistamphp/byte-stream2.1.2indirect
Packagistamphp/cache2.0.1indirect
Packagistamphp/dns2.4.0indirect
Packagistamphp/parallel2.4.0indirect
Packagistamphp/parser1.1.1indirect
Packagistamphp/pipeline1.2.5indirect
Packagistamphp/process2.1.0indirect
Packagistamphp/serialization1.1.0indirect
Packagistamphp/socket2.4.0indirect
Packagistamphp/sync2.3.0indirect
Packagistclue/ndjson-react1.3.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdaverandom/libdns2.1.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.6indirect
Packagistergebnis/agent-detector1.2.0indirect
Packagistevenement/evenement3.0.2indirect
Packagistext-mbstring—indirect
Packagistfidry/console0.6.11indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistfidry/filesystem1.3.0indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer—indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer3.95.11indirect
Packagisthumbug/box4.7.0indirect
Packagisthumbug/php-scoper0.18.18indirect
Packagistjetbrains/phpstorm-stubs2024.3indirect
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema6.10.0indirect
Packagistkelunik/certificate1.1.3indirect
Packagistleague/uri7.8.1indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces7.8.1indirect
Packagistlib-libxml—indirect
Packagistmarc-mabe/php-enum4.7.2indirect
Packagistnikic/iter2.4.1indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.7.0indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock5.6.7indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver1.12.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.2indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.2.3indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistreact/cache1.2.0indirect
Packagistreact/child-process0.6.7indirect
Packagistreact/dns1.14.0indirect
Packagistreact/event-loop1.6.0indirect
Packagistreact/promise3.3.0indirect
Packagistreact/socket1.17.0indirect
Packagistreact/stream1.4.0indirect
Packagistrevolt/event-loop1.0.9indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff7.0.0indirect
Packagistseld/jsonlint1.12.1indirect
Packagistseld/phar-utils1.2.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem7.4.11indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/phpunit-bridge—indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-iconv1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php811.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/process7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/twig-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper7.4.14indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml—indirect
Packagistthecodingmachine/safe3.4.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.12.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 77 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 11 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.