Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 15:57 UTC

jonathanong / pr-shepherd

Automatic Pull Request Autofixing for Claude Code

TypeScriptMIT★ 3 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

jonathanong/pr-shepherd holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (77/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (35/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

jongleberryPersonal account
2,417 followers61 public repossince Feb 2011@houzz

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmpr-shepherd0.32.54,595631 day agogithubpull-requestcicode-reviewautomationcodexclaudeclaude-code

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

62Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 304 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year304
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 62 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count62
latest_release_tagv0.32.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

35Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

5Critical
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars3
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

61Moderate
How it's scored
48.8/80Monthly downloads — 4,595 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespr-shepherd
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads4,595
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

31At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 71% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 20 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.707

Issue & PR responsiveness

87Excellent
How it's scored
39.9/42Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
29.5/30PR acceptance — 231/235 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs231
open_issues4
closed_issues77
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.951
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

74Good
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
24.3/25Owner reach — 2,417 followers of jonathanong
25/25Track record — 61 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,417
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginjonathanong
public_repos61
account_age_days5,615
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 63 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespr-shepherd
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

58Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 9/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 20 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes13,309
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

32At Risk
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/4 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes1,347
source_files_sampled4
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3GitHub stars
4contributors
304commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
62releases
1bus factor
4open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 15:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 9/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 20 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmpicomatch^4.0.4package.json
npmyaml^2.7.0package.json
All dependencies 195

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 193 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmpicomatch4.0.5direct
npmyaml2.9.0direct
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.2indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.0indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.0indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.6indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm-eabi0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm640.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-darwin-arm640.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-darwin-x640.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-freebsd-x640.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-linux-arm64-gnu0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-linux-arm64-musl0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-linux-riscv64-musl0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-linux-s390x-gnu0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-linux-x64-gnu0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-linux-x64-musl0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-openharmony-arm640.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-wasm32-wasi0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-win32-arm64-msvc0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-win32-ia32-msvc0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-parser/binding-win32-x64-msvc0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.137.0indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-android-arm-eabi11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-android-arm6411.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-darwin-arm6411.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-darwin-x6411.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-freebsd-x6411.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-linux-arm64-gnu11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-linux-arm64-musl11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-linux-riscv64-musl11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-linux-s390x-gnu11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-linux-x64-gnu11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-linux-x64-musl11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-openharmony-arm6411.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-wasm32-wasi11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-win32-arm64-msvc11.21.3indirect
npm@oxc-resolver/binding-win32-x64-msvc11.21.3indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-android-arm-eabi0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-android-arm640.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-darwin-arm640.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-darwin-x640.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-freebsd-x640.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm64-gnu0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm64-musl0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-riscv64-musl0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-s390x-gnu0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-x64-gnu0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-x64-musl0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-openharmony-arm640.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-win32-arm64-msvc0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-win32-ia32-msvc0.57.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-win32-x64-msvc0.57.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-android-arm-eabi1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-android-arm641.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-darwin-arm641.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-darwin-x641.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-freebsd-x641.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-musl1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-linux-x64-musl1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-openharmony-arm641.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-ia32-msvc1.72.0indirect
npm@oxlint/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.72.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.3indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/node26.1.0indirect
npm@types/picomatch4.0.3indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.9indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.9indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.0indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.0.0indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfd-package-json2.0.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmformatly0.3.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-tsconfig4.14.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmhusky9.1.7indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmknip6.24.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.2indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.15indirect
npmobug2.1.1indirect
npmoxc-parser0.137.0indirect
npmoxc-resolver11.21.3indirect
npmoxfmt0.57.0indirect
npmoxlint1.72.0indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmresolve-pkg-maps1.0.0indirect
npmrolldown1.1.3indirect
npmsemver7.7.4indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsmol-toml1.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments5.0.3indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.1.1indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinypool2.1.0indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmunbash4.0.2indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmvite8.1.0indirect
npmvitest4.1.9indirect
npmwalk-up-path4.0.0indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmzod4.4.3indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with jonathanong/pr-shepherd. Read them side by side →

93affaan-m/ECCThe agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.Exceptional92danger/danger🚫 Stop saying "you forgot to …" in code review (in Ruby)Excellent97github/gh-awGitHub Agentic WorkflowsExceptional95NousResearch/hermes-agentThe agent that grows with youExceptional94open-gsd/gsd-coreGit. Ship. Done - CoreExceptional94diegosouzapw/OmniRouteNever stop coding. Free MIT AI gateway: one endpoint, 290+ providers (90+ free), 500+ models — Kimi, Claude, GPT, OpenAI, Gemini, GLM, DeepSeek, MiniMax. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Cline & Copilot. Quota-aware auto-fallback, RTK+Caveman compression saves 15-95% tokens, MCP/A2A, Desktop/PWA. Built by 500+ contributorsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.