Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 08:06 UTC

The-PR-Agent / pr-agent

🚀 PR Agent: The Original Open-Source PR Reviewer. This project is not the Qodo free tier.

PythonMIT★ 13,075 stars⑂ 1,864 forkssince Jul 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#openai#pull-request#code-review#pull-requests#coding-assistant#devtools#ai#anthropic#ollama

The-PR-Agent/pr-agent holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on Security (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

The PR AgentOrganization
19 followers2 public repossince Feb 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIpr-agent0.45.026,6282114 days agoaiagentspull-requestautomationcode-review

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

96Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence — 46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 842 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year842
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year46

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 37 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 14 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~8.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count37
latest_release_tagv0.45.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release14
mean_days_between_releases8.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

86Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

95Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 13,075 stars
25/25Forks — 1,864 forks
9.8/15Watchers — 60 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,864
stars13,075
watchers60
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

74Good
How it's scored
59/80Monthly downloads — 26,628 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespr-agent
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads26,628
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 53% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 97 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 40 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled97
top_contributor_share0.534

Issue & PR responsiveness

88Excellent
How it's scored
41.2/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
23.4/30PR acceptance — 1,867/2,395 decided PRs merged
8.7/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs1,867
open_issues20
closed_issues1,032
prs_merged_7d36
prs_decided_7d41
prs_merged_30d52
prs_decided_30d57
issue_closed_ratio0.981
closed_unmerged_prs528
first_time_authors_30d4
first_time_prs_merged_30d4
first_time_prs_decided_30d6

Ownership & stewardship

44Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.4/25Owner reach — 19 followers of The-PR-Agent
4.6/25Track record — 2 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers19
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginThe-PR-Agent
public_repos2
account_age_days205

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 14 days ago
20/20Version history — 21 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespr-agent
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish14

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.pr-agent.ai
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsopenai, pull-request, code-review, pull-requests, coding-assistant, devtools, ai, anthropic, ollama
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.pr-agent.ai
docs_sitehttps://www.pr-agent.ai
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

34At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 40 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate8
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier75
security_posture_after_multiplier60
security_posture_before_jurisdiction80
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages130
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:pr-agent@0.45.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 130 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes11,845

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

76Good
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — pr_agent/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 8 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspr_agent/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.08
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01

Code legibility for models

79Good
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (pr_agent/py.typed)
52.1/55Manageable file sizes — 21/392 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes374,163
source_files_sampled392
oversized_source_files21

Key facts

13,075GitHub stars
97contributors
842commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
37releases
1bus factor
20open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 15 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,864 ⇿
0Stars
1,864Forks
21Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

5001,0001,5002,0001,864282025-062026-012026-09
Major 0Minor 11Patch 5

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.0 / 10
8.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 08:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 40 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 28 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 42
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaiohttp>=3.14.3,<4pyproject.toml
PyPIanthropic>=0.69.0pyproject.toml
PyPIatlassian-python-api==3.41.4pyproject.toml
PyPIazure-devops==7.1.0b4pyproject.toml
PyPIazure-identity==1.25.0pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3==1.43.78pyproject.toml
PyPIcertifi>=2026.7.22pyproject.toml
PyPIdynaconf>=3.3.5,<4pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.141.1,<1pyproject.toml
PyPIGitPython>=3.1.62,<4pyproject.toml
PyPIstarlette>=1.6.0,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-cloud-aiplatform==1.154.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-cloud-storage==2.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-cloud-storage==3.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIprotobuf==6.33.6pyproject.toml
PyPIJinja2==3.1.6pyproject.toml
PyPIlitellm==1.101.0pyproject.toml
PyPIloguru==0.7.3pyproject.toml
PyPImsrest==0.7.1pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai>=1.55.3pyproject.toml
PyPIPyGithub>=2.10,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIPyJWT>=2.13.0,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIPyYAML==6.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-gitlab==8.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIretry==0.9.2pyproject.toml
PyPIstarlette-context==0.3.6pyproject.toml
PyPItiktoken==0.12.0pyproject.toml
PyPIujson>=5.13.0,<6pyproject.toml
PyPIunidiff==0.7.5pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.31.1,<1pyproject.toml
PyPItenacity==8.2.3pyproject.toml
PyPIa2a-sdk==1.0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIlangfuse==3.14.5pyproject.toml
PyPIgunicorn==23.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic==2.13.3pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings==2.14.2pyproject.toml
PyPIhtml2text==2024.2.26pyproject.toml
PyPIgiteapy==1.0.8pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-api==1.43.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk==1.43.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http==1.43.0pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-client==0.21.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 186

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 42 direct and 144 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIa2a-sdk1.0.3direct
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3direct
PyPIanthropic0.116.0direct
PyPIatlassian-python-api3.41.4direct
PyPIazure-devops7.1.0b4direct
PyPIazure-identity1.25.0direct
PyPIboto31.43.78direct
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22direct
PyPIdynaconf3.3.5direct
PyPIfastapi0.141.1direct
PyPIgiteapy1.0.8direct
PyPIgitpython3.1.62direct
PyPIgoogle-cloud-aiplatform1.154.0direct
PyPIgoogle-cloud-storage2.10.0direct
PyPIgoogle-cloud-storage3.12.0direct
PyPIgunicorn23.0.0direct
PyPIhtml2text2024.2.26direct
PyPIjinja23.1.6direct
PyPIlangfuse3.14.5direct
PyPIlitellm1.101.0direct
PyPIloguru0.7.3direct
PyPImsrest0.7.1direct
PyPIopenai2.44.0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.43.0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http1.43.0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk1.43.0direct
PyPIprometheus-client0.21.1direct
PyPIprotobuf6.33.6direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.3direct
PyPIpydantic-settings2.14.2direct
PyPIpygithub2.10.0direct
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0direct
PyPIpython-gitlab8.3.0direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.1direct
PyPIretry0.9.2direct
PyPIstarlette1.6.0direct
PyPIstarlette-context0.3.6direct
PyPItenacity8.2.3direct
PyPItiktoken0.12.0direct
PyPIujson5.13.0direct
PyPIunidiff0.7.5direct
PyPIuvicorn0.52.4direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiologic0.17.1indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIazure-core1.41.0indirect
PyPIbackoff2.2.1indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.83indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.0indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIculsans0.11.0indirect
PyPIdecorator5.3.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdeprecation2.1.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.18.0indirect
PyPIfastuuid0.14.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.5indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2025.12.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.6.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-core2.31.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.55.1indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-bigquery3.42.1indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-core2.6.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-resource-manager1.18.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-crc32c1.8.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-genai2.10.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-resumable-media2.10.0indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.75.0indirect
PyPIgrpc-google-iam-v10.14.4indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.83.1indirect
PyPIgrpcio-status1.83.1indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh24.4.1indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.5.1indirect
PyPIhpack4.2.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.22.0indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.1.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.9.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIisodate0.7.2indirect
PyPIjiter0.16.0indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjson-rpc1.15.0indirect
PyPIjsonpatch1.33indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.1.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIlance-namespace0.12.0indirect
PyPIlance-namespace-urllib3-client0.12.0indirect
PyPIlancedb0.38.0indirect
PyPIlangchain1.3.11indirect
PyPIlangchain-core1.4.8indirect
PyPIlangchain-openai1.3.3indirect
PyPIlangchain-protocol0.0.18indirect
PyPIlanggraph1.2.7indirect
PyPIlanggraph-checkpoint4.1.1indirect
PyPIlanggraph-prebuilt1.1.0indirect
PyPIlanggraph-sdk0.4.2indirect
PyPIlangsmith0.9.8indirect
PyPImangum0.22.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImsal1.37.0indirect
PyPImsal-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImsgspec0.21.1indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.1indirect
PyPIoauthlib3.3.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-proto1.43.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions0.64b0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.9indirect
PyPIormsgpack1.12.2indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.3indirect
PyPIpinecone10.0.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIportalocker3.2.0indirect
PyPIpr-agent0.45.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIproto-plus1.28.0indirect
PyPIpy1.11.0indirect
PyPIpyarrow24.0.0indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.3indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpynacl1.6.2indirect
PyPIpyopenssl26.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.4.3indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIqdrant-client1.15.1indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.6.28indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-oauthlib2.0.0indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruff0.16.8indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.2indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.3indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.0.3indirect
PyPItokenizers0.23.1indirect
PyPItqdm4.68.3indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuuid-utils0.16.2indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.5.2indirect
PyPIwebsockets15.0.1indirect
PyPIwin32-setctime1.2.0indirect
PyPIwrapt1.17.3indirect
PyPIxxhash3.8.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.2indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
PyPIzstandard0.25.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:pr-agent@0.45.0 pulls in 130 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with The-PR-Agent/pr-agent. Read them side by side →

98strands-agents/toolsA set of tools that gives agents powerful capabilities.Exceptional96JetBrains/koogKoog is a JVM (Java and Kotlin) framework for building predictable, fault-tolerant and enterprise-ready AI agents across all platforms – from backend services to Android and iOS, JVM, and even in-browser environments. Koog is based on our AI products expertise and provides proven solutions for complex LLM and AI problemsExceptional98langchain-ai/langchainThe agent engineering platform.Exceptional97strands-agents/harness-sdkBuild an agent harness and control it end-to-end. Open-source SDK for production AI agents in Python & TypeScript - any model, any cloud.Exceptional96e2b-dev/E2BOpen-source, secure environment with real-world tools for enterprise-grade agents.Exceptional98PostHog/posthog-jsSend usage data from your web app or site to PostHog, with autocapture.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.