Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 05:42 UTC

juicedata / juicefs-operator

JuiceFS Operator

GoApache-2.0★ 13 stars⑂ 9 forkssince Sep 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

juicedata/juicefs-operator holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (38/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

juicedataOrganization
225 followers54 public repossince Apr 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/juicedata/juicefs-operatorv0.8.5-353 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
13.8/36Commit cadence20/52 weeks with commits
14.5/18Commit volume40 commits in the last year
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained7 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
commits_last_year40
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year20

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases35 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~32.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count35
latest_release_tagv0.8.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases32.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

38Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
17.5/60Stars13 stars
7.5/25Forks9 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks9
stars13
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 86% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.863
How it's scored
34.6/42Issue resolution82% of issues closed
29.3/30PR acceptance84/86 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 18/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs84
open_issues6
closed_issues28
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.824
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
16.9/25Owner reach225 followers of juicedata
24.7/25Track record54 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers225
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginjuicedata
public_repos54
account_age_days3,385
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history35 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/juicedata/juicefs-operator
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests21 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscache, juicefs, sync, warmup
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2/2.5CI-Tests21 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 18/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
6.8/7.5Maintained7 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities35 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/46 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes39,982
source_files_sampled46
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

13GitHub stars
7contributors
40commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
35releases
1bus factor
6open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 05:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests21 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 18/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
9Maintained7 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities35 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2v2.22.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomegav1.36.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/samber/lov1.49.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.9.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.33.0go.mod
Gok8s.io/apiv0.32.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.32.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.32.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/component-helpersv0.32.2go.mod
Gok8s.io/klog/v2v2.130.1go.mod
Gok8s.io/kubectlv0.32.2go.mod
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtimev0.20.2go.mod
All dependencies 99

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 85 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v22.22.2direct
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomega1.36.2direct
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v33.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/samber/lo1.49.1direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobra1.9.1direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.10.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.33.0direct
Gok8s.io/api0.32.2direct
Gok8s.io/apimachinery0.32.2direct
Gok8s.io/client-go0.32.2direct
Gok8s.io/component-helpers0.32.2direct
Gok8s.io/klog/v22.130.1direct
Gok8s.io/kubectl0.32.2direct
Gosigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime0.20.2direct
Gocel.dev/expr0.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/antlr4-go/antlr/v44.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/asaskevich/govalidator0.0.0-20190424111038-f61b66f89f4aindirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perks1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/blang/semver/v44.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v44.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v22.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v33.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patch/v55.9.11indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoop1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotify1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fxamacker/cbor/v22.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logr1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdr1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/zapr1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreference0.20.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swag0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-task/slim-sprig/v33.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/btree1.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/google/cel-go0.22.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic-models0.6.8indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmp0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gofuzz1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/pprof0.0.0-20241210010833-40e02aabc2adindirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocket1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v22.20.0indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/intern1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/go1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjson0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/spdystream0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrent0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect21.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautoneg0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/mxk/go-flowrate0.0.0-20140419014527-cca7078d478findirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golang1.19.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_model0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/common0.55.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfs0.15.1indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflag1.0.6indirect
Gogithub.com/stoewer/go-strcase1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/x448/float160.8.4indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp0.53.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel1.28.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace1.28.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc1.27.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric1.28.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk1.28.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace1.28.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlp1.3.1indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierr1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zap1.27.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/exp0.0.0-20240719175910-8a7402abbf56indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.33.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.23.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sync0.11.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.30.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/term0.29.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/time0.7.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/tools0.28.0indirect
Gogomodules.xyz/jsonpatch/v22.4.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api0.0.0-20240826202546-f6391c0de4c7indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc0.0.0-20240826202546-f6391c0de4c7indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.65.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.36.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v44.12.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v00.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Gok8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver0.32.1indirect
Gok8s.io/apiserver0.32.1indirect
Gok8s.io/component-base0.32.2indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapi0.0.0-20241105132330-32ad38e42d3findirect
Gok8s.io/utils0.0.0-20241104100929-3ea5e8cea738indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/apiserver-network-proxy/konnectivity-client0.31.0indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/json0.0.0-20241010143419-9aa6b5e7a4b3indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v44.4.2indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yaml1.4.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.