Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-26 02:00 UTC

jztan / redmine-mcp-server

MCP server connecting AI assistants to Redmine: issues, projects, wikis, time tracking, agile boards, and CRM, with OAuth2 multi-user support

PythonMIT★ 79 stars⑂ 35 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryMCP serverCommand-line toolNetwork servicehow this is determined
#agent#agentic-ai#redmine#agentic-workflow#mcp-servers#mcp-tools#kanban#chatgpt#claude#claude-code#codex#cursor#vscode#mcp#model-context-protocol#oauth2#project-management#python#time-tracking

jztan/redmine-mcp-server holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (50/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

jztanPersonal account
12 followers25 public repossince Nov 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIredmine-mcp-server2.17.02,405450 days agomcpmodel-context-protocolproject-managementredmineserver

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

93Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
29.1/36Commit cadence — 42/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,014 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 20 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,014
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year42

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 38 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count38
latest_release_tagv2.17.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

44Weak
How it's scored
30.7/60Stars — 79 stars
12.8/25Forks — 35 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks35
stars79
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate
How it's scored
45.1/80Monthly downloads — 2,405 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesredmine-mcp-server
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,405
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 12 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled12
top_contributor_share0.939

Issue & PR responsiveness

85Excellent
How it's scored
41.6/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
26/30PR acceptance — 206/238 decided PRs merged
12.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 23/24 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs206
open_issues1
closed_issues102
prs_merged_7d16
prs_decided_7d16
prs_merged_30d45
prs_decided_30d46
issue_closed_ratio0.99
closed_unmerged_prs32
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d23
first_time_prs_decided_30d24

Ownership & stewardship

50Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
8/25Owner reach — 12 followers of jztan
22.3/25Track record — 25 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers12
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginjztan
public_repos25
account_age_days4,689
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 45 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesredmine-mcp-server
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://redmine-mcp-server.jztan.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 19 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagent, agentic-ai, redmine, agentic-workflow, mcp-servers, mcp-tools, kanban, chatgpt, claude, claude-code, codex, cursor, vscode, mcp, model-context-protocol, oauth2, project-management, python, time-tracking
has_wikino
homepagehttps://redmine-mcp-server.jztan.com
docs_sitehttps://redmine-mcp-server.jztan.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 20 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages2
assessed_packages111
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 111 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 92 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.979
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

67Good
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 34 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 6 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.34
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.06

Code legibility for models

53Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
53.2/55Manageable file sizes — 6/186 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes156,128
source_files_sampled186
oversized_source_files6

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

79GitHub stars
12contributors
1,014commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
38releases
1bus factor
1open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:redmine-mcp-server@2.17.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 35 ⇿
0Stars
35Forks
29Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383422026-022026-052026-09
Major 2Minor 21Patch 6
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-26 01:59 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 6/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 20 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.0.0,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.27.0,<1pyproject.toml
PyPIfastmcp>=4.0.1,<5pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-redmine>=2.5.0,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.31.0,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIstarlette>=1.3.1,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.24.0,<1pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-multipart>=0.0.30,<1pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3>=2.7.0,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIpyjwt>=2.13.0,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=48.0.1,<51pyproject.toml
PyPIjoserfc>=1.6.7,<2pyproject.toml
All dependencies 111

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 99 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIcryptography50.0.1direct
PyPIfastmcp4.0.5direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIjoserfc1.7.5direct
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3direct
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32direct
PyPIpython-redmine2.5.0direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIstarlette1.6.0direct
PyPIurllib32.8.0direct
PyPIuvicorn0.53.0direct
PyPIaiofile3.9.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIanyio4.9.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.3.0indirect
PyPIauthlib1.7.0indirect
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbeartype0.22.9indirect
PyPIblack26.5.1indirect
PyPIcachetools7.0.5indirect
PyPIcaio0.9.25indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.4.26indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.2indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.0indirect
PyPIcyclopts4.10.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdnspython2.7.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.17.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIemail-validator2.2.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.0indirect
PyPIfastmcp-slim4.0.5indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.0indirect
PyPIflake87.3.0indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.0.2indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.4.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjsonref1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.25.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-path0.4.5indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImcp2.1.1indirect
PyPImcp-types2.1.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools10.8.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIopenapi-pydantic0.5.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.40.0indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpathable0.5.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.4.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIpy-key-value-aio0.4.4indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.14.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpydantic2.12.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.9.1indirect
PyPIpyflakes3.4.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyperclip1.11.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.2.2indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2indirect
PyPIredmine-mcp-server2.17.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.36.2indirect
PyPIrich14.0.0indirect
PyPIrich-rst1.3.2indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.27.1indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.10indirect
PyPItomli2.2.1indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIuncalled-for0.4.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.2.4indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets15.0.1indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 111 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
anyio4.9.0indirectcritical24.14.2
authlib1.7.0indirectmoderate21.7.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with jztan/redmine-mcp-server. Read them side by side →

99awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional97Observal/ObservalObserval is self-hosted registry for your coding agent extensions with a built in insight engine. Setup Observal, define the scope and share your Skills, MCPs and Agents with your peers.Exceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional99ag2ai/ag2AG2 (formerly AutoGen): The Open-Source AgentOS.Join us at: https://discord.gg/sNGSwQME3xExceptional98ModelEngine-Group/nexentNexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering principles — unified tools, skills, memory, and orchestration with built-in constraints, feedback loops, and control planes.Exceptional100stacklok/toolhiveToolHive is an enterprise-grade platform for running and managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.