Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 05:11 UTC

kadoa-org / kadoa-sdks

Kadoa SDKs

TypeScript · PythonMIT★ 4 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Sep 2025View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

kadoa-org/kadoa-sdks holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

KadoaOrganization

24 followers6 public repossince Apr 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@kadoa/node-sdk	0.43.0	10,057	56	0 days ago	kadoa api sdk client typescript node
PyPI	kadoa_sdk	0.20.0	-	41	133 days ago	kadoa api sdk client python

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

89Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
24.9/36	Commit cadence — 36/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 376 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	376
human_commit_share	0.87
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	36

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 76 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~6.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	76
latest_release_tag	node-sdk-v0.43.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	6.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical

How it's scored

7.7/60	Stars — 4 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	4
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

67Good

How it's scored

53.4/80	Monthly downloads — 10,057 downloads/month across npm, pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@kadoa/node-sdk, kadoa_sdk
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm, pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	10,057
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

26At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 86% of commits
8.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	6
top_contributor_share	0.863

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
21.6/30	PR acceptance — 262/364 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 26/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

merged_prs	262
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	4
prs_decided_7d	4
prs_merged_30d	6
prs_decided_30d	6
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	102
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
10.1/25	Owner reach — 24 followers of kadoa-org
11/25	Track record — 6 public repos, account ~2 yr old

Inputs used

followers	24
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	kadoa-org
public_repos	6
account_age_days	884

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 56 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@kadoa/node-sdk, kadoa_sdk
ecosystems	npm, pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

85Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

82Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — biome.json, sdks/python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.kadoa.com
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	https://docs.kadoa.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

59Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 26/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 72 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	5.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

42Weak

How it's scored

6.4/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: aiohttp 3.13.2 (critical 9.1), urllib3 2.5.0 (high 7.5), aiohttp 3.14.1 (moderate 5.3), +1 more
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
25.3/40	No advisories left outstanding — 3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 277 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	89
affected_packages	8
assessed_packages	92
unassessed_packages	3
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 3, moderate 3, low 1
direct_affected_packages	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 92 resolved dependencies against OSV. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — .cursor/rules/envrc-direnv.mdc, .cursor/rules/local-scripts-folder.mdc, .cursor/rules/python-uv-patterns.mdc, AGENTS.md, sdks/node/AGENTS.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 87 of 87 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	.cursor/rules/envrc-direnv.mdc, .cursor/rules/local-scripts-folder.mdc, .cursor/rules/python-uv-patterns.mdc, AGENTS.md, sdks/node/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	5,568

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — biome.json, sdks/python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — examples/node-examples/tsconfig.json, sdks/node/tsconfig.json, sdks/python/kadoa_sdk/py.typed, tools/codegen/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 15 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 13 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	examples/node-examples/tsconfig.json, sdks/node/tsconfig.json, sdks/python/kadoa_sdk/py.typed, tools/codegen/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.15
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.13

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/254 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	28,749
source_files_sampled	254
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — specs/openapi.json
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	specs/openapi.json
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

4GitHub stars

6contributors

376commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

76releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
pypi download statistics for 'kadoa_sdk' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
deps.dev does not index npm:@kadoa/node-sdk@0.43.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

32Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10

5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 05:11 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9	CI-Tests	27 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9	Code-Review	Found 26/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	72 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 16

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	axios	`1.18.1`	sdks/node/package.json
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	sdks/node/package.json
npm	es-toolkit	`1.48.1`	sdks/node/package.json
npm	uuid	`14.0.1`	sdks/node/package.json
npm	ws	`8.21.0`	sdks/node/package.json
PyPI	certifi	`—`	sdks/python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-dateutil	`—`	sdks/python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-dotenv	`—`	sdks/python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic	`—`	sdks/python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`—`	sdks/python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	urllib3	`>=2.4.0`	sdks/python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	websockets	`—`	sdks/python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	aiohttp	`>=3.11.18`	sdks/python/pyproject.toml
PyPI	aiohttp-retry	`—`	sdks/python/pyproject.toml
npm	@openapitools/openapi-generator-cli	`2.39.0`	tools/codegen/package.json
npm	commander	`15.0.0`	tools/codegen/package.json

All dependencies 95

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 23 direct and 72 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@openapitools/openapi-generator-cli	`2.39.0`	direct
npm	axios	`1.18.1`	direct
npm	commander	`15.0.0`	direct
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	direct
npm	es-toolkit	`1.48.1`	direct
npm	uuid	`14.0.1`	direct
npm	ws	`8.21.0`	direct
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.13.2`	direct
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.14.1`	direct
PyPI	aiohttp-retry	`2.9.1`	direct
PyPI	certifi	`2025.10.5`	direct
PyPI	certifi	`2026.1.4`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.12.4`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.12.5`	direct
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.11.0`	direct
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.14.2`	direct
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	direct
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.1`	direct
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.2`	direct
PyPI	urllib3	`2.5.0`	direct
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	direct
PyPI	websockets	`15.0.1`	direct
PyPI	websockets	`16.0`	direct
npm	@biomejs/biome	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/cli	`21.0.2`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/config-conventional	`21.0.2`	indirect
npm	@kadoa/node-sdk	`*`	indirect
npm	@types/bun	`latest`	indirect
npm	@types/debug	`^4.1.12`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/uuid	`^11.0.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`5.6.2`	indirect
npm	dotenv	`17.4.2`	indirect
npm	husky	`9.1.7`	indirect
npm	tsup	`8.5.1`	indirect
npm	turbo	`2.9.18`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	zod	`4.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiosignal	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`25.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	black	`26.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	boolean-py	`5.0`	indirect
PyPI	cachecontrol	`0.14.4`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.13.4`	indirect
PyPI	cyclonedx-python-lib	`11.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.24.2`	indirect
PyPI	frozenlist	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.11`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.15`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	kadoa-sdk	`0.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	librt	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	license-expression	`30.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	msgpack	`1.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy	`1.19.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	packageurl-python	`0.17.6`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.0`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	pip	`26.1`	indirect
PyPI	pip-api	`0.0.34`	indirect
PyPI	pip-audit	`2.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	pip-requirements-parser	`32.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	py-serializable	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.41.5`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.19.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-timeout	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytokens	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.33.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`14.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	sortedcontainers	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomli-w	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.22.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 8

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 92 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 8 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
aiohttp	`3.13.2`	direct	critical	64	`3.14.3`
urllib3	`2.5.0`	direct	high	8	`2.7.0`
click	`8.3.1`	indirect	high	1	`8.3.3`
pip	`26.1`	indirect	high	4	`26.2.0`
aiohttp	`3.14.1`	direct	moderate	6	`3.14.3`
python-dotenv	`1.2.1`	direct	moderate	2	`1.2.2`
idna	`3.11`	indirect	moderate	2	`3.15`
pygments	`2.19.2`	indirect	low	2	`2.20.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records