Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 11:46 UTC

kcl-lang / lib

KCL Multiple Language Bindings including Rust, Go, Python, Java, Kotlin, .NET, Swift, Lua, Node.js, Zig, C, C++, WASM, etc.

C# · KotlinApache-2.0★ 21 stars⑂ 16 forkssince Dec 2022View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryhow this is determined

kcl-lang/lib holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on Security (43/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

The KCL Programming LanguageOrganization

166 followers46 public repossince Nov 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	kcl-lang.io/lib	v0.12.5	-	95	21 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

77Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 5 days ago
13.2/36	Commit cadence — 19/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 133 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	133
human_commit_share	0.85
days_since_last_push	5
active_weeks_last_year	19

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 87 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 21 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~63.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	87
latest_release_tag	v0.12.5
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	21
mean_days_between_releases	63.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

31At Risk

How it's scored

21.1/60	Stars — 21 stars
9.8/25	Forks — 16 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	16
stars	21
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 73% of commits
10.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	8
top_contributor_share	0.73

Issue & PR responsiveness

81Excellent

How it's scored

33.1/42	Issue resolution — 79% of issues closed
27.2/30	PR acceptance — 256/282 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7

Inputs used

merged_prs	256
open_issues	4
closed_issues	15
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.789
closed_unmerged_prs	26
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

66Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
16/25	Owner reach — 166 followers of kcl-lang
19.9/25	Track record — 46 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	166
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	kcl-lang
public_repos	46
account_age_days	1,405

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 21 days ago
20/20	Version history — 95 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	kcl-lang.io/lib
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	21

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 14 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — nodejs/package.json ("prettier"), python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.kcl-lang.io/docs/reference/xlang-api/overview
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://www.kcl-lang.io/docs/reference/xlang-api/overview
docs_site	https://www.kcl-lang.io/docs/reference/xlang-api/overview
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

44Weak

How it's scored

0/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 7/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 21 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	4.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

41Weak

How it's scored

8/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core 2.13.2 (high 7.5), com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind 2.13.2 (high 8.1), pyo3 0.20.2 (high 7.5), +1 more
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
23/40	No advisories left outstanding — 4 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,652 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	19
affected_packages	7
assessed_packages	39
unassessed_packages	53
affected_by_severity	high 4, moderate 2, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 39 resolved dependencies against OSV. 53 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 84 of 85 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.988
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

90Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — c/Makefile, cpp/Makefile, dotnet/Makefile, java/Makefile, kotlin/Makefile, lua/Makefile, nodejs/Makefile, python/Makefile, spec/Makefile, swift/Makefile, zig/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — nodejs/package.json ("prettier"), python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11	Static type checking — nodejs/examples/exec-program/tsconfig.json, nodejs/tsconfig.json, wasm/examples/browser/tsconfig.json, wasm/examples/node/tsconfig.json, wasm/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 10 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 15 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	c/Makefile, cpp/Makefile, dotnet/Makefile, java/Makefile, kotlin/Makefile, lua/Makefile, nodejs/Makefile, python/Makefile, spec/Makefile, swift/Makefile, zig/Makefile
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	nodejs/examples/exec-program/tsconfig.json, nodejs/tsconfig.json, wasm/examples/browser/tsconfig.json, wasm/examples/node/tsconfig.json, wasm/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.1
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, c/Cargo.toml, cpp/Cargo.toml, dotnet/Cargo.toml, dotnet/KclLib.Tests/KclLib.Tests.csproj, dotnet/KclLib/KclLib.csproj, dotnet/examples/exec-program/exec-program.csproj, go.mod, java/Cargo.toml, java/pom.xml, kotlin/Cargo.toml, kotlin/pom.xml, lua/Cargo.toml, nodejs/Cargo.toml, python/Cargo.toml, swift/Cargo.toml, wasm/examples/go/go.mod, wasm/examples/rust/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.15

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.1/55	Manageable file sizes — 6/368 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	C#
largest_source_bytes	2,548,829
source_files_sampled	368
oversized_source_files	6

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — spec/spec.proto
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	spec/spec.proto
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

21GitHub stars

8contributors

133commits, last 12 months

5days since last push

87releases

1bus factor

4open issues

crates.io, Go, Maven, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch crates package 'kcl-lang' from its registry
Could not fetch crates package 'kcl-lib-c' from its registry
Could not fetch maven package 'com.kcl:kcl-lib' from its registry
Could not fetch crates package 'kcl-lib-cpp' from its registry
Could not fetch maven package 'com.kcl:kcl-lib-kotlin' from its registry
Could not fetch crates package 'kcl-lib-lua' from its registry
Could not fetch crates package 'kcl-lib-jni' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 16 ⇿

0Stars

16Forks

75Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 8Patch 37

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10

4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 11:46 UTC

0	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7	Code-Review	Found 7/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10	Contributors	project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	21 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 62

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	anyhow	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-api	`0.12.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-evaluator	`0.12.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-loader	`0.12.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-parser	`0.12.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-runtime	`0.12.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-primitives	`0.12.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-api	`0.12.5`	c/Cargo.toml
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0`	cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.io	cxx	`1.0`	cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-api	`0.12.5`	cpp/Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-api	`0.12.5`	dotnet/Cargo.toml
Go	github.com/ebitengine/purego	`v0.9.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gofrs/flock	`v0.12.1`	go.mod
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.11`	go.mod
crates.io	jni	`0.21.1`	java/Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde_json	`1`	java/Cargo.toml
crates.io	indexmap	`2.2.5`	java/Cargo.toml
crates.io	anyhow	`1`	java/Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1`	java/Cargo.toml
crates.io	once_cell	`1.19.0`	java/Cargo.toml
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.4.0`	java/Cargo.toml
crates.io	prost	`0.14.1`	java/Cargo.toml
crates.io	prost-types	`0.14.1`	java/Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-parser	`0.12.5`	java/Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-sema	`0.12.5`	java/Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-api	`0.12.5`	java/Cargo.toml
Maven	com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java	`${protobuf-java.version}`	java/pom.xml
Maven	com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java-util	`${protobuf-java.version}`	java/pom.xml
Maven	org.slf4j:slf4j-api	`${slf4j.version}`	java/pom.xml
Maven	com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core	`${jackson.version}`	java/pom.xml
Maven	com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations	`${jackson.version}`	java/pom.xml
Maven	com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind	`${jackson.version}`	java/pom.xml
Maven	org.apache.commons:commons-lang3	`${apache.commons-lang3.version}`	java/pom.xml
crates.io	jni	`0.21.1`	kotlin/Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde_json	`1`	kotlin/Cargo.toml
crates.io	indexmap	`2.2.5`	kotlin/Cargo.toml
crates.io	anyhow	`1`	kotlin/Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1`	kotlin/Cargo.toml
crates.io	once_cell	`1.19.0`	kotlin/Cargo.toml
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.4.0`	kotlin/Cargo.toml
crates.io	prost	`0.14.1`	kotlin/Cargo.toml
crates.io	prost-types	`0.14.1`	kotlin/Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-parser	`0.12.5`	kotlin/Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-sema	`0.12.5`	kotlin/Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-api	`0.12.5`	kotlin/Cargo.toml
Maven	com.google.protobuf:protobuf-kotlin	`${protobuf.version}`	kotlin/pom.xml
Maven	org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk8	`${kotlin.version}`	kotlin/pom.xml
Maven	com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core	`2.13.2`	kotlin/pom.xml
Maven	com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations	`2.13.2`	kotlin/pom.xml
Maven	com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind	`2.13.2`	kotlin/pom.xml
crates.io	mlua	`0.9`	lua/Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-api	`0.12.5`	lua/Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-api	`0.12.5`	nodejs/Cargo.toml
crates.io	napi	`2.12.2`	nodejs/Cargo.toml
crates.io	napi-derive	`2.12.2`	nodejs/Cargo.toml
crates.io	kcl-api	`0.12.5`	python/Cargo.toml
crates.io	pyo3	`=0.20.2`	python/Cargo.toml
PyPI	protobuf	`>=6.33.1`	python/pyproject.toml
crates.io	kcl-api	`0.12.5`	swift/Cargo.toml
npm	@wasmer/wasi	`^1.2.2`	wasm/package.json
npm	prettier	`^2.8.4`	wasm/package.json

All dependencies 92

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 36 direct and 56 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	anyhow	`—`	direct
crates.io	cxx	`—`	direct
crates.io	indexmap	`—`	direct
crates.io	jni	`—`	direct
crates.io	kcl-api	`—`	direct
crates.io	kcl-evaluator	`—`	direct
crates.io	kcl-loader	`—`	direct
crates.io	kcl-parser	`—`	direct
crates.io	kcl-primitives	`—`	direct
crates.io	kcl-runtime	`—`	direct
crates.io	kcl-sema	`—`	direct
crates.io	lazy_static	`—`	direct
crates.io	mlua	`—`	direct
crates.io	napi	`—`	direct
crates.io	napi-derive	`—`	direct
crates.io	once_cell	`—`	direct
crates.io	prost	`—`	direct
crates.io	prost-types	`—`	direct
crates.io	pyo3	`0.20.2`	direct
crates.io	serde	`—`	direct
crates.io	serde_json	`—`	direct
Go	github.com/ebitengine/purego	`v0.9.1`	direct
Go	github.com/gofrs/flock	`v0.12.1`	direct
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.11`	direct
Maven	com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations	`2.13.2`	direct
Maven	com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core	`2.13.2`	direct
Maven	com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind	`2.13.2`	direct
Maven	com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java	`4.33.1`	direct
Maven	com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java-util	`4.33.1`	direct
Maven	com.google.protobuf:protobuf-kotlin	`4.33.1`	direct
Maven	org.apache.commons:commons-lang3	`3.4`	direct
Maven	org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk8	`1.9.25`	direct
Maven	org.slf4j:slf4j-api	`1.7.30`	direct
npm	@wasmer/wasi	`^1.2.2`	direct
npm	prettier	`^2.8.4`	direct
PyPI	protobuf	`—`	direct
crates.io	cbindgen	`—`	indirect
crates.io	cxx-build	`—`	indirect
crates.io	napi-build	`—`	indirect
crates.io	wasmtime	`—`	indirect
crates.io	wasmtime-wasi	`—`	indirect
Go	github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime-go/v39	`39.0.1`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.25.0`	indirect
Maven	ch.qos.logback:logback-classic	`1.2.3`	indirect
Maven	junit:junit	`4.13`	indirect
Maven	net.revelc.code.formatter:formatter-maven-plugin	`2.16.0`	indirect
Maven	org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin	`3.3`	indirect
Maven	org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-eclipse-plugin	`2.6`	indirect
Maven	org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin	`—`	indirect
Maven	org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin	`3.6.3`	indirect
Maven	org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin	`2.0.2`	indirect
Maven	org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin	`3.1.2`	indirect
Maven	org.codehaus.mojo:buildnumber-maven-plugin	`1.4`	indirect
Maven	org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin	`3.1.0`	indirect
Maven	org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-maven-plugin	`1.9.25`	indirect
Maven	org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-test	`1.9.25`	indirect
Maven	org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api	`5.10.0`	indirect
Maven	org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine	`5.10.0`	indirect
Maven	org.openjdk.jmh:jmh-core	`1.28`	indirect
Maven	org.openjdk.jmh:jmh-generator-annprocess	`1.28`	indirect
npm	@jest/globals	`^30.2.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/cli	`^2.18.1`	indirect
npm	@types/jest	`^29.5.12`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`^20.12.1`	indirect
npm	ava	`^6.0.1`	indirect
npm	buffer	`^6.0.3`	indirect
npm	copy-webpack-plugin	`^8.1.1`	indirect
npm	css-loader	`^5.2.4`	indirect
npm	cssnano	`^5.0.1`	indirect
npm	html-webpack-plugin	`^5.3.1`	indirect
npm	jest	`^29.7.0`	indirect
npm	kcl-lib	`0.12.5`	indirect
npm	mini-css-extract-plugin	`^1.5.0`	indirect
npm	postcss	`^8.2.10`	indirect
npm	postcss-import	`^14.0.1`	indirect
npm	postcss-loader	`^5.2.0`	indirect
npm	ts-jest	`^29.2.5`	indirect
npm	ts-node	`^10.9.2`	indirect
npm	typedoc	`^0.25`	indirect
npm	typescript	`^5.0.2`	indirect
npm	typescript	`^5.3.3`	indirect
npm	webpack	`^5.34.0`	indirect
npm	webpack-cli	`^4.6.0`	indirect
npm	webpack-dev-server	`^3.11.2`	indirect
NuGet	coverlet.collector	`6.0.0`	indirect
NuGet	Google.Protobuf	`3.27.2`	indirect
NuGet	KclLib	`0.12.5`	indirect
NuGet	Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk	`17.8.0`	indirect
NuGet	MSTest.TestAdapter	`3.1.1`	indirect
NuGet	MSTest.TestFramework	`3.1.1`	indirect
NuGet	Newtonsoft.Json	`13.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	maturin	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 39 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct. 53 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core	`2.13.2`	direct	high	2	`3.1.4`
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind	`2.13.2`	direct	high	8	`3.1.4`
pyo3	`0.20.2`	direct	high	5	`0.29.0`
ch.qos.logback:logback-classic	`1.2.3`	indirect	high	1	`1.4.12`
org.apache.commons:commons-lang3	`3.4`	direct	moderate	1	`3.18.0`
junit:junit	`4.13`	indirect	moderate	1	`4.13.1`
golang.org/x/sys	`v0.25.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.44.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records