Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 11:24 UTC

knaisoma / data-olympus

Governance-grade, OKF-compatible knowledge-base format with a single-writer MCP server and CLI. Pre-release.

PythonApache-2.0★ 30 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolMCP serverLibraryhow this is determined
#ai-agents#knowledge-base#knowledge-management#markdown#mcp#model-context-protocol#okf

knaisoma/data-olympus holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (53/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

KnaisomaOrganization
3 followers4 public repossince May 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIdata-olympus0.11.22,283460 days agoagentsgovernanceknowledge-basemcpokfrag

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 321 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year321
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year14

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 52 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count52
latest_release_tagv0.11.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases1.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

30At Risk
How it's scored
23.7/60Stars — 30 stars
6.5/25Forks — 7 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars30
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate
How it's scored
44.8/80Monthly downloads — 2,283 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdata-olympus
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,283
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

18Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.99

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good
How it's scored
30.5/42Issue resolution — 73% of issues closed
24.6/30PR acceptance — 226/276 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs226
open_issues31
closed_issues82
prs_merged_7d11
prs_decided_7d11
prs_merged_30d53
prs_decided_30d53
issue_closed_ratio0.726
closed_unmerged_prs50
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

44Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
4.3/25Owner reach — 3 followers of knaisoma
10/25Track record — 4 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers3
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginknaisoma
public_repos4
account_age_days890

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 46 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdata-olympus
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 17 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, knowledge-base, knowledge-management, markdown, mcp, model-context-protocol, okf
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

75Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

69Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
3.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.9

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages146
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 146 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, tests/importer-fixtures/.cursorrules, tests/importer-fixtures/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, tests/importer-fixtures/.cursorrules, tests/importer-fixtures/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes7,276

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

70Good
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54/55Manageable file sizes — 7/381 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes126,788
source_files_sampled381
oversized_source_files7

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

30GitHub stars
4contributors
321commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
52releases
1bus factor
31open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:data-olympus@0.11.2; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7 ⇿
0Stars
7Forks
39Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1234567712026-062026-082026-10
Major 0Minor 9Patch 12
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10
6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 11:24 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfastmcp>=3.4.4,<4pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.30.0,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.9pyproject.toml
PyPIregex>=2024.5pyproject.toml
All dependencies 146

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 141 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIfastmcp3.4.7direct
PyPImcp1.30.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.5direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIregex2026.9.10direct
PyPIaiofile3.12.3indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.15.1indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.9.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIauthlib1.8.0indirect
PyPIbeartype0.22.9indirect
PyPIcachetools7.1.8indirect
PyPIcaio0.12.2indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcloudpickle3.1.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.16.0indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.2indirect
PyPIcuda-bindings13.3.1indirect
PyPIcuda-pathfinder1.8.1indirect
PyPIcuda-toolkit13.0.3.0indirect
PyPIcyclopts4.24.0indirect
PyPIdata-olympus0.0.0+unreleasedindirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.18.0indirect
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfastembed0.8.1indirect
PyPIfastmcp-slim3.4.7indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.5indirect
PyPIflatbuffers25.12.19indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.7.0indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.3.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.6.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.30.0indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjoblib1.6.0indirect
PyPIjoserfc1.7.5indirect
PyPIjsonref1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-path0.5.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.15.0indirect
PyPIloguru0.7.3indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImmh35.3.0indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInarwhals2.25.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.3indirect
PyPInvidia-cublas13.1.1.3indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-cupti13.0.85indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-nvrtc13.0.88indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-runtime13.0.96indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu139.24.0.43indirect
PyPInvidia-cufft12.0.0.61indirect
PyPInvidia-cufile1.15.1.6indirect
PyPInvidia-curand10.4.0.35indirect
PyPInvidia-cusolver12.0.4.66indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparse12.6.3.3indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparselt-cu130.8.1indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu132.30.7indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink13.3.33indirect
PyPInvidia-nvshmem-cu133.4.5indirect
PyPInvidia-nvtx13.0.85indirect
PyPIonnxruntime1.29.0indirect
PyPIopenapi-pydantic0.5.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.44.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathable0.6.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.7indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIprometheus-client0.26.0indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.36.1indirect
PyPIpy-key-value-aio0.4.5indirect
PyPIpy-rust-stemmers0.1.8indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.15.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.15.1indirect
PyPIpyperclip1.11.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrich-rst2.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIruff0.16.9indirect
PyPIsafetensors0.8.0indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.9.0indirect
PyPIscipy1.18.1indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsentence-transformers6.1.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools84.0.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.5.0indirect
PyPIstarlette1.7.0indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPIthreadpoolctl3.6.0indirect
PyPItiktoken0.14.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.23.2indirect
PyPItorch2.14.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.70.0indirect
PyPItransformers5.16.1indirect
PyPItriton3.8.0indirect
PyPItyper0.27.2indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260906indirect
PyPItypes-regex2026.9.10.20260911indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.4indirect
PyPIuncalled-for0.4.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.54.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets17.1indirect
PyPIwin32-setctime1.2.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 146 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with knaisoma/data-olympus. Read them side by side →

100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional95juspay/neurolinkOne TypeScript interface for 24+ LLM providers — swap providers without rewriting. MCP-native (connect any MCP server), voice (TTS/STT/realtime), RAG, memory, file processors. Production-origin: powers Tara, Yama, and Clairvoyance at Juspay.Exceptional98mem0ai/mem0The Memory Layer for AI Agents - Drop-in memory infrastructure for AI agents and apps. Context that persists. Built for production.Exceptional98ComposioHQ/composioComposio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to help you build AI agents that turn intent into action.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.