Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 01:17 UTC

knowsuchagency / fulcrum

What if Openclaw, Vibe Kanban, Vibetunnel, and Dokploy had a baby?

TypeScriptCustom license★ 90 stars⑂ 22 forkssince Dec 2025archivedView on GitHub ↗
KindChat botWeb interfaceMCP serverhow this is determined

knowsuchagency/fulcrum holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Vitality (79/100) and lowest on Security (15/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Stephan FitzpatrickPersonal account
240 followers214 public repossince Apr 2015KNOWSUCHAGENCY CORP

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@knowsuchagency/fulcrum5.14.181,37024417 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 15 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,448 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,448
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push15
active_weeks_last_year35
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 17 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv5.14.18
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release17
mean_days_between_releases7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31.6/60Stars — 90 stars
11/25Forks — 22 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks22
stars90
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
41.8/80Monthly downloads — 1,370 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@knowsuchagency/fulcrum
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,370
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.99
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
24.3/30PR acceptance — 103/127 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs103
open_issues0
closed_issues10
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs24
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
17.1/25Owner reach — 240 followers of knowsuchagency
25/25Track record — 214 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers240
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginknowsuchagency
public_repos214
account_age_days4,165
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 17 days ago
20/20Version history — 244 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@knowsuchagency/fulcrum
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish17

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagents, ai, coding
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

15Critical · 16% of overall
How it's scored
2.2/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project is archived
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 186 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate1.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 88 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.88
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes18,025
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — cli/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesmise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configscli/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.06
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 2/546 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes133,098
source_files_sampled546
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofchat-bot

Key facts

90GitHub stars
6contributors
1,448commits, last 12 months
15days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 22 ⇿
0Stars
22Forks
95Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242222025-122026-042026-07
Major 1Minor 22Patch 72
OpenSSF Scorecard 1.5 / 10
1.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 01:16 UTC

3Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities186 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 72
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk0.3.241package.json
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop^1.7.7package.json
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop-hitbox^1.1.0package.json
npm@azurity/pure-nerd-font^3.0.5package.json
npm@base-ui/react^1.0.0package.json
npm@dagrejs/dagre^1.1.8package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/ibm-plex-sans^5.2.8package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/jetbrains-mono^5.2.8package.json
npm@fontsource/ibm-plex-mono^5.2.7package.json
npm@hono/node-server^1.19.7package.json
npm@hono/node-ws^1.2.0package.json
npm@hugeicons/core-free-icons^3.0.0package.json
npm@hugeicons/react^1.1.3package.json
npm@mdx-js/mdx^3.1.1package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.11.0package.json
npm@monaco-editor/react^4.7.0package.json
npm@octokit/rest^22.0.1package.json
npm@openai/codex-sdk^0.130.0package.json
npm@opencode-ai/sdk^1.1.34package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-collapsible^1.1.12package.json
npm@slack/bolt^4.6.0package.json
npm@tailwindcss/vite^4.1.17package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.90.12package.json
npm@tanstack/react-router^1.141.8package.json
npm@tanstack/react-virtual^3.13.19package.json
npm@types/mdx^2.0.13package.json
npm@uiw/react-markdown-preview^5.1.5package.json
npm@uiw/react-md-editor^4.0.11package.json
npm@whiskeysockets/baileys^7.0.0-rc12package.json
npm@xterm/addon-clipboard^0.2.0package.json
npm@xterm/addon-fit^0.11.0package.json
npm@xterm/addon-serialize^0.14.0package.json
npm@xterm/addon-web-links^0.12.0package.json
npm@xterm/headless^6.0.0package.json
npm@xterm/xterm^6.0.0package.json
npmbun-pty^0.4.2package.json
npmcitty^0.1.6package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1package.json
npmcloudflare^5.2.0package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1package.json
npmdate-fns^4.1.0package.json
npmdiscord.js^14.25.1package.json
npmdrizzle-orm^0.45.1package.json
npmfancy-ansi^0.1.3package.json
npmglob^13.0.0package.json
npmgoogleapis^171.0.0package.json
npmhono^4.11.1package.json
npmi18next^25.7.3package.json
npmimapflow^1.2.6package.json
npmlucide-react^0.511.0package.json
npmmobx^6.15.0package.json
npmmobx-react-lite^4.1.1package.json
npmmobx-state-tree^7.0.2package.json
npmnext-themes^0.4.6package.json
npmnode-telegram-bot-api^0.67.0package.json
npmqrcode^1.5.4package.json
npmreact^19.2.0package.json
npmreact-day-picker^9.13.0package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.0package.json
npmreact-i18next^16.5.0package.json
npmreact-resizable-panels^4.0.11package.json
npmreactflow^11.11.4package.json
npmrecharts2.15.4package.json
npmshadcn^3.6.2package.json
npmshiki^3.20.0package.json
npmsonner^2.0.7package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.4.0package.json
npmtailwindcss^4.1.17package.json
npmtsdav^2.1.6package.json
npmtw-animate-css^1.4.0package.json
npmws^8.18.3package.json
npmyaml^2.8.2package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.