Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 09:22 UTC

kornelski / dssim

Image similarity comparison simulating human perception (multiscale SSIM in Rust)

RustAGPL-3.0★ 1,203 stars⑂ 85 forkssince Feb 2011View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

kornelski/dssim holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (73/100) and lowest on Vitality (46/100). It was last updated 19 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

KornelPersonal account
2,193 followers400 public repossince Apr 2009@ImageOptim

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iodssim3.5.16,1543452 days agoimagecomparisonbenchmarkssimvisualcommand-line-utilities
crates.iodssim-core3.5.129,2512052 days agoimagecomparisonssimmetricobjective

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

46Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 19 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
11.1/18Commit volume — 16 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year16
human_commit_share0.86
days_since_last_push19
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 18 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 594 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~358 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count18
latest_release_tag3.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release594
mean_days_between_releases358

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
50/60Stars — 1,203 stars
16/25Forks — 85 forks
6.8/15Watchers — 18 watchers
Inputs used
forks85
stars1,203
watchers18
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
60.7/80Monthly downloads — 35,405 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdssim, dssim-core
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads810,079
monthly_downloads35,405
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 85% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 12 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled12
top_contributor_share0.85
How it's scored
38/42Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
13.4/30PR acceptance — 53/119 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs53
open_issues7
closed_issues67
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.905
closed_unmerged_prs66
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
24/25Owner reach — 2,193 followers of kornelski
25/25Track record — 400 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,193
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginkornelski
public_repos400
account_age_days6,403
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 52 days ago
20/20Version history — 34 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdssim, dssim-core
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish52

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://kornel.ski/dssim
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdssim, compress-images, libpng, comparison, c, ssim, similarity, similarity-measurement, image-benchmark
has_wikino
homepagehttps://kornel.ski/dssim
docs_sitehttps://kornel.ski/dssim
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 5/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages27
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the crates:dssim@3.5.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 27 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
6.2/40Legible commit history — 10 of 86 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.116
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, clic-2021/Cargo.toml, dssim-core/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 14 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, clic-2021/Cargo.toml, dssim-core/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.14
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/16 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes24,978
source_files_sampled16
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,203GitHub stars
12contributors
16commits, last 12 months
19days since last push
18releases
1bus factor
7open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'clic-2021' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 85 ⇿
0Stars
85Forks
18Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801008432011-072019-022026-09
Major 1Minor 5Patch 7

Each point covers 14 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 09:22 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 5/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iodssim-core3.5.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioimgref1.12.3Cargo.toml
crates.iogetopts0.2.24Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon1.12.0Cargo.toml
crates.iorgb0.8.53Cargo.toml
crates.iolodepng3.12Cargo.toml
crates.ioload_image3.3Cargo.toml
crates.iocrossbeam-channel0.5.16Cargo.toml
crates.ioordered-channel1.2.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.41clic-2021/Cargo.toml
crates.ioconcurrent_lru0.2.0clic-2021/Cargo.toml
crates.iocsv1.1.6clic-2021/Cargo.toml
crates.iodssim-core3.1.0clic-2021/Cargo.toml
crates.iolodepng3.4.6clic-2021/Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon1.5.1clic-2021/Cargo.toml
crates.ioimgref1.12.3dssim-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools0.15dssim-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon1.12.0dssim-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iorgb0.8.53dssim-core/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 72

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 56 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhow—direct
crates.ioconcurrent_lru—direct
crates.iocrossbeam-channel0.5.16direct
crates.iocsv—direct
crates.iodssim-core—direct
crates.iogetopts0.2.24direct
crates.ioimgref—direct
crates.ioitertools—direct
crates.ioitertools0.15.0direct
crates.iolodepng—direct
crates.iolodepng3.12.2direct
crates.ioordered-channel1.2.0direct
crates.iorayon—direct
crates.iorayon1.12.0direct
crates.iorgb—direct
crates.iorgb0.8.53direct
crates.ioadler22.0.1indirect
crates.ioaom-decode0.2.13indirect
crates.ioarrayvec0.7.8indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.ioavif-parse1.4.0indirect
crates.iobitreader0.3.11indirect
crates.iobytemuck1.25.2indirect
crates.iobyteorder1.5.0indirect
crates.iocc1.4.4indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iocmake0.1.58indirect
crates.iocrc32fast1.5.1indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.7indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.20indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.22indirect
crates.iodunce1.0.5indirect
crates.ioeither1.18.0indirect
crates.iofallible_collections0.5.2indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.11indirect
crates.ioflate21.1.10indirect
crates.ioforeign-types0.5.0indirect
crates.ioforeign-types-macros0.2.4indirect
crates.ioforeign-types-shared0.3.1indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iojobserver0.1.35indirect
crates.iojpeg-decoder0.3.2indirect
crates.iolcms26.2.0indirect
crates.iolcms2-sys4.0.7indirect
crates.ioleb1280.2.7indirect
crates.iolibaom-sys0.17.2+libaom.3.11.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.189indirect
crates.iolibwebp0.1.2indirect
crates.iolibwebp-sys20.1.11indirect
crates.iolog0.4.34indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.9.1indirect
crates.iomoxcms0.9.0indirect
crates.iomozjpeg0.10.13indirect
crates.iomozjpeg-sys2.2.3indirect
crates.ionasm-rs0.3.2indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.iopkg-config0.3.34indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107indirect
crates.iopxfm0.1.30indirect
crates.ioquick-error2.0.1indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.47indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.iorexif0.7.5indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.iosimd-adler320.3.10indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.4indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2indirect
crates.iovcpkg0.2.15indirect
crates.ioyuv0.1.10indirect
crates.iozlib-rs0.6.7indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing crates:dssim@3.5.1 pulls in 27 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.