Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 00:12 UTC

korridor / laravel-model-validation-rules

This package is an alternative to the Laravel built-in validation rules exists and unique. It uses Eloquent models instead of directly querying the database.

PHPMIT★ 29 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Sep 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#laravel#validation#laravel-validation-rules#laravel-validation#eloquent#softdelete#model

korridor/laravel-model-validation-rules holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (67/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (38/100). It was last updated 30 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Constantin GrafPersonal account
114 followers39 public repossince Mar 2017

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistkorridor/laravel-model-validation-rules3.4.08,7741393 days agovalidationmodellaravelruleeloquentexist

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

52Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

37Weak
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 30 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
7/18Commit volume — 5 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year5
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push30
active_weeks_last_year2

Release discipline

74Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 11 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 93 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~260.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count11
latest_release_tag3.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release93
mean_days_between_releases260.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

29At Risk
How it's scored
23.5/60Stars — 29 stars
5.8/25Forks — 6 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars29
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

53Moderate
How it's scored
52.6/80Monthly downloads — 8,774 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageskorridor/laravel-model-validation-rules
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads230,798
monthly_downloads8,774
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 81% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.808

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.7/30PR acceptance — 24/28 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs24
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.8/25Owner reach — 114 followers of korridor
23.7/25Track record — 39 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers114
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginkorridor
public_repos39
account_age_days3,401
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 93 days ago
20/20Version history — 13 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageskorridor/laravel-model-validation-rules
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish93

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

72Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaravel, validation, laravel-validation-rules, laravel-validation, eloquent, softdelete, model
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.2/2.5CI-Tests — 3 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

60Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/11 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes17,007
source_files_sampled11
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

29GitHub stars
5contributors
5commits, last 12 months
30days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 00:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1CI-Tests3 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/support^10|^11|^12|^13composer.json
Packagistilluminate/database^10|^11|^12|^13composer.json
All dependencies 82

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 82 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistcomposer/semver1.5.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler1.4.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/annotations1.8.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/inflector1.3.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.3.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer1.0.2indirect
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression2.3.0indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator2.1.11indirect
Packagisterusev/parsedown1.7.3indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer2.16.0indirect
Packagistfzaninotto/faker1.8.0indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php2.0.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework5.8.35indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem1.0.57indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery1.2.4indirect
Packagistmonolog/monolog1.25.1indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.9.3indirect
Packagistnesbot/carbon2.26.0indirect
Packagistopis/closure3.4.1indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench3.8.5indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core3.8.7indirect
Packagistparagonie/random_compat9.99.99indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest1.0.3indirect
Packagistphar-io/version2.0.1indirect
Packagistphp-cs-fixer/diff1.3.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.0.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock4.3.2indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver1.0.1indirect
Packagistphpoption/phpoption1.5.2indirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy1.9.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage6.1.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator2.0.2indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template1.2.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer2.1.2indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-token-stream3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit7.5.17indirect
Packagistpsr/container1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log1.1.2indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache1.0.1indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid3.8.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator3.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff3.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment4.2.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter3.1.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state2.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector1.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations2.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/version2.0.1indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.5.2indirect
Packagistswiftmailer/swiftmailer6.2.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/console4.3.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector4.3.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/debug4.3.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher4.3.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts1.1.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem4.3.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder4.3.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation4.4.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel4.3.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime4.4.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver4.3.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.12.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-iconv1.12.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.13.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.13.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php701.12.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php721.13.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php731.12.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process4.3.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing4.3.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts1.1.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch4.3.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation4.3.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts1.1.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper4.3.7indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.1.3indirect
Packagisttijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles2.2.2indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv3.6.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.5.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with korridor/laravel-model-validation-rules. Read them side by side →

94mongodb/laravel-mongodbA MongoDB based Eloquent model and Query builder for Laravel (Moloquent)Exceptional84spatie/laravel-sluggableAn opinionated package to create slugs for Eloquent modelsExcellent83relaticle/custom-fieldsFilament plugin that allows to add dynamic, user-defined form fields, enhancing the customization and functionality of admin panels.Excellent89spatie/laravel-medialibraryAssociate files with Eloquent modelsExcellent88statamic/eloquent-driverProvides support for storing your Statamic data in a database, rather than flat files.Excellent87relaticle/flowforgeLaravel Kanban boards with intelligent pagination, drag-and-drop ordering, and flexible integration patterns for Filament and Livewire applications.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.