Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 13:43 UTC

kubb-labs / plugins

🧡 Official and community plugins for Kubb.

TypeScriptMIT★ 5 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗

kubb-labs/plugins holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (54/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

KubbOrganization
37 followers6 public repossince Jan 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@kubb/plugin-tspoints to another repo — not scored4.39.2732,58468728 days agotypescripttypestype-generationinterfacestype-definitionstype-safeopenapiswaggeroascode-generatorcodegenpluginskubb
npm@kubb/plugin-mcppoints to another repo — not scored4.39.231,55952528 days agomcpmodel-context-protocolaillmclaudeai-toolsopenapiswaggertypescriptcode-generatorcodegenpluginskubb
npm@kubb/plugin-mswpoints to another repo — not scored4.39.2129,69768728 days agomswmock-service-workerapi-mockingmockingmockstestingdevelopmentinterceptortypescriptopenapiswaggeroascode-generatorcodegenpluginskubb
npm@kubb/plugin-swrpoints to another repo — not scored4.39.229,97067528 days agoswrreactnextjsnextnext.jsverceldata-fetchingreact-hookshooksapi-clientsdk-generatortypescripttype-safeopenapiswaggeroascode-generatorcodegenpluginskubb
npm@kubb/plugin-zodpoints to another repo — not scored4.39.2608,69168828 days agozodschemaschema-validationvalidationruntime-validationtype-safetytype-safetypescriptopenapiswaggeroascode-generatorcodegenpluginskubb
npm@kubb/plugin-axios5.0.0-beta.993,507177 days agoapi-clientaxioscode-generationcodegenhttp-clientkubbopenapiswaggertypescript
npm@kubb/plugin-fakerpoints to another repo — not scored4.39.2161,39768728 days agofakerfaker.jsfakerjsmock-datamocksdata-generationfixturestestingdevelopmenttypescriptopenapiswaggeroascode-generatorcodegenpluginskubb
npm@kubb/plugin-fetch5.0.0-beta.993,720177 days agoapi-clientcode-generationcodegenfetchhttp-clientkubbopenapiswaggertypescript

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence14/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,276 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,276
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year14

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag@kubb/plugin-react-query@5.0.0-beta.104
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases0.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars5 stars
4/25Forks4 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars5
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
51.5/80Monthly downloads7,227 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@kubb/plugin-axios, @kubb/plugin-fetch
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads7,227
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 55% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.552
How it's scored
38.8/42Issue resolution92% of issues closed
17.6/30PR acceptance387/658 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs387
open_issues5
closed_issues61
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.924
closed_unmerged_prs271
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
11.4/25Owner reach37 followers of kubb-labs
13.2/25Track record6 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers37
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginkubb-labs
public_repos6
account_age_days1,292
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 7 days ago
20/20Version history17 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@kubb/plugin-axios, @kubb/plugin-fetch
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.kubb.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics14 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaxios, code, community, faker, fetch, generation, kubb, meta, msw, plugins, react-query, typescript, vue-query, zod
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.kubb.dev
docs_sitehttps://www.kubb.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
1.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
8.4/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: fast-uri 3.1.3 (high 7.5), ws 8.18.0 (high 7.5)
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages2
assessed_packages144
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the npm:@kubb/plugin-ts@4.39.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 144 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

81Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history75 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.781
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,859
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingexamples/advanced/tsconfig.json, examples/axios/tsconfig.json, examples/cypress/tsconfig.json, examples/faker/tsconfig.json, examples/fetch/tsconfig.json, examples/mcp/tsconfig.json, examples/msw/tsconfig.json, examples/react-query/tsconfig.json, examples/sdk/tsconfig.json, examples/simple-single/tsconfig.json, examples/swr/tsconfig.json, examples/typescript/tsconfig.json, examples/vue-query/tsconfig.json, examples/zod/tsconfig.json, internals/client/tsconfig.json, internals/shared/tsconfig.json, internals/tanstack-query/tsconfig.json, internals/utils/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-axios/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-cypress/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-faker/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-fetch/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-msw/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-react-query/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-redoc/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-swr/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-ts/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-vue-query/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-zod/tsconfig.json, tests/3.0.x/tsconfig.json, tests/e2e/tsconfig.json, tests/performance/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice35 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsexamples/advanced/tsconfig.json, examples/axios/tsconfig.json, examples/cypress/tsconfig.json, examples/faker/tsconfig.json, examples/fetch/tsconfig.json, examples/mcp/tsconfig.json, examples/msw/tsconfig.json, examples/react-query/tsconfig.json, examples/sdk/tsconfig.json, examples/simple-single/tsconfig.json, examples/swr/tsconfig.json, examples/typescript/tsconfig.json, examples/vue-query/tsconfig.json, examples/zod/tsconfig.json, internals/client/tsconfig.json, internals/shared/tsconfig.json, internals/tanstack-query/tsconfig.json, internals/utils/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-axios/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-cypress/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-faker/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-fetch/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-msw/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-react-query/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-redoc/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-swr/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-ts/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-vue-query/tsconfig.json, packages/plugin-zod/tsconfig.json, tests/3.0.x/tsconfig.json, tests/e2e/tsconfig.json, tests/performance/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.35
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/3,911 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes43,977
source_files_sampled3,911
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5GitHub stars
4contributors
1,276commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
5open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • npm package '@kubb/plugin-ts' points at a different repository (https://github.com/kubb-labs/kubb); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@kubb/plugin-mcp' points at a different repository (https://github.com/kubb-labs/kubb); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@kubb/plugin-msw' points at a different repository (https://github.com/kubb-labs/kubb); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@kubb/plugin-swr' points at a different repository (https://github.com/kubb-labs/kubb); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@kubb/plugin-zod' points at a different repository (https://github.com/kubb-labs/kubb); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@kubb/plugin-faker' points at a different repository (https://github.com/kubb-labs/kubb); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks
87Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412026-052026-062026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 13:43 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
3Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 27
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@internals/sharedworkspace:*internals/client/package.json
npm@internals/utilsworkspace:*internals/client/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-tsworkspace:*internals/client/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-zodworkspace:*internals/client/package.json
npmkubbcatalog:internals/client/package.json
npm@internals/utilsworkspace:*internals/shared/package.json
npmkubbcatalog:internals/shared/package.json
npm@internals/sharedworkspace:*internals/tanstack-query/package.json
npm@internals/utilsworkspace:*internals/tanstack-query/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-tsworkspace:*internals/tanstack-query/package.json
npmkubbcatalog:internals/tanstack-query/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-tsworkspace:*packages/plugin-axios/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-zodworkspace:*packages/plugin-axios/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-tsworkspace:*packages/plugin-cypress/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-tsworkspace:*packages/plugin-faker/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-tsworkspace:*packages/plugin-fetch/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-zodworkspace:*packages/plugin-fetch/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-tsworkspace:*packages/plugin-mcp/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-zodworkspace:*packages/plugin-mcp/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-fakerworkspace:*packages/plugin-msw/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-tsworkspace:*packages/plugin-msw/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-tsworkspace:*packages/plugin-react-query/package.json
npm@kubb/adapter-oascatalog:packages/plugin-redoc/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-tsworkspace:*packages/plugin-swr/package.json
npm@kubb/parser-tscatalog:packages/plugin-ts/package.json
npmtypescriptcatalog:packages/plugin-ts/package.json
npm@kubb/plugin-tsworkspace:*packages/plugin-vue-query/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 2

Installing npm:@kubb/plugin-ts@4.39.2 pulls in 144 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
fast-uri3.1.3indirecthigh14.1.1
ws8.18.0indirecthigh28.21.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.