Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 22:32 UTC

lagerdata / lager

Hardware test automation: drive real instruments and embedded targets from your laptop or CI

Python · ShellApache-2.0★ 6 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#cli #embedded #hardware-in-the-loop #hardware-testing #jlink #labjack #mcp #python #scpi #test-automation

lagerdata/lager holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (54/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Lager DataOrganization · verified domain

2 followers51 public repossince Feb 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
PyPI	lager-cli	0.40.0	3,809	396	1 day ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

81Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
17.3/36	Commit cadence — 25/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 799 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 26 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	799
human_commit_share	0.97
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	25

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v0.40.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

16Critical

How it's scored

11.3/60	Stars — 6 stars
2.5/25	Forks — 3 forks
1.7/15	Watchers — 3 watchers

Inputs used

forks	3
stars	6
watchers	3
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate

How it's scored

47.7/80	Monthly downloads — 3,809 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	lager-cli
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	3,809
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

30At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 52% of commits
6.8/13.5	Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	5
top_contributor_share	0.522

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good

How it's scored

33.6/42	Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
28.2/30	PR acceptance — 265/282 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	265
open_issues	11
closed_issues	44
prs_merged_7d	40
prs_decided_7d	43
prs_merged_30d	52
prs_decided_30d	55
issue_closed_ratio	0.8
closed_unmerged_prs	17
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	2
first_time_prs_decided_30d	2

Ownership & stewardship

78Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
3.4/25	Owner reach — 2 followers of lagerdata
24.5/25	Track record — 51 public repos, account ~7 yr old

Inputs used

followers	2
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	lagerdata
public_repos	51
account_age_days	2,733

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20	Version history — 396 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	lager-cli
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 12 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.lagerdata.com
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 10 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	cli, embedded, hardware-in-the-loop, hardware-testing, jlink, labjack, mcp, python, scpi, test-automation
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://docs.lagerdata.com
docs_site	https://docs.lagerdata.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

62Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 2/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 26 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	6.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	38
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:lager-cli@0.40.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 38 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.lagerdata.com/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 83 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://docs.lagerdata.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.856
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

62Moderate

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — box/oscilloscope-daemon/Cargo.toml, box/oscilloscope-daemon/cli/Cargo.toml, box/oscilloscope-daemon/daemon/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
8/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.04
toolchain_manifests	box/oscilloscope-daemon/Cargo.toml, box/oscilloscope-daemon/cli/Cargo.toml, box/oscilloscope-daemon/daemon/Cargo.toml, box/oscilloscope-daemon/protocol/Cargo.toml, box/oscilloscope-daemon/wtransport_test/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.03

Code legibility for models

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
53.6/55	Manageable file sizes — 18/711 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	171,612
source_files_sampled	711
oversized_source_files	18

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

6GitHub stars

5contributors

799commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

11open issues

npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿

0Stars

3Forks

78Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 23Patch 55

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10

6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 22:31 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
5	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 2/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 26 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
1	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 285

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 285 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	anstream	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.14`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.10`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`—`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.104`	indirect
crates.io	asn1-rs	`0.7.1`	indirect
crates.io	asn1-rs-derive	`0.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	asn1-rs-impl	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	async-trait	`—`	indirect
crates.io	async-trait	`0.1.92`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	base64	`0.22.1`	indirect
crates.io	bindgen	`—`	indirect
crates.io	bindgen	`0.72.1`	indirect
crates.io	bit-vec	`0.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.9.2`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.19.0`	indirect
crates.io	bytes	`1.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`—`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	cexpr	`0.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	cfg_aliases	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	chacha20	`0.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	clang-sys	`1.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`—`	indirect
crates.io	clap	`4.6.6`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.6.6`	indirect
crates.io	clap_derive	`4.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	const-oid	`0.10.2`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation	`0.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam	`—`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam	`0.8.4`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-channel	`0.5.15`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.6`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.20`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-queue	`0.3.12`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.21`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-common	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	data-encoding	`2.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	der-parser	`10.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	deranged	`0.5.3`	indirect
crates.io	digest	`0.11.3`	indirect
crates.io	displaydoc	`0.2.5`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	form_urlencoded	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	futures	`—`	indirect
crates.io	futures	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-channel	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-core	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-executor	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-io	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-macro	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-sink	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-task	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-util	`—`	indirect
crates.io	futures-util	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.16`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4.3`	indirect
crates.io	glob	`0.3.3`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	httlib-huffman	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	http	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	httparse	`1.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	hybrid-array	`0.4.13`	indirect
crates.io	icu_collections	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_locale_core	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer_data	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties_data	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	icu_provider	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna_adapter	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.70.1`	indirect
crates.io	itertools	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.15`	indirect
crates.io	js-sys	`0.3.77`	indirect
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.189`	indirect
crates.io	libloading	`0.8.8`	indirect
crates.io	litemap	`0.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	lock_api	`0.4.13`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.27`	indirect
crates.io	lru-slab	`0.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.7.5`	indirect
crates.io	minimal-lexical	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	mio	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	nom	`7.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	nu-ansi-term	`0.50.3`	indirect
crates.io	num-bigint	`0.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	num-conv	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	num-integer	`0.1.46`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.19`	indirect
crates.io	octets	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	oid-registry	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`—`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell_polyfill	`1.70.1`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-probe	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	parking_lot	`0.12.4`	indirect
crates.io	parking_lot_core	`0.9.11`	indirect
crates.io	pem	`3.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	percent-encoding	`2.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.16`	indirect
crates.io	potential_utf	`0.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	powerfmt	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.21`	indirect
crates.io	prettyplease	`0.2.37`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.107`	indirect
crates.io	quinn	`0.11.9`	indirect
crates.io	quinn-proto	`0.11.15`	indirect
crates.io	quinn-udp	`0.5.14`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.47`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`5.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`6.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`0.10.2`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`0.9.4`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.9.3`	indirect
crates.io	rcgen	`0.14.8`	indirect
crates.io	redox_syscall	`0.5.17`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.9`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.5`	indirect
crates.io	ring	`0.17.14`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-hash	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	rusticata-macros	`4.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	rustls	`0.23.31`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-native-certs	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-pemfile	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-pemfile	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-pki-types	`1.15.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-webpki	`0.103.13`	indirect
crates.io	schannel	`0.1.28`	indirect
crates.io	scopeguard	`1.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework	`3.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework-sys	`2.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`—`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`—`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.151`	indirect
crates.io	sha1	`0.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	sha2	`0.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	sharded-slab	`0.1.7`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	signal-hook-registry	`1.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	slab	`0.4.11`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.15.1`	indirect
crates.io	socket2	`0.6.5`	indirect
crates.io	stable_deref_trait	`1.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	subtle	`2.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`3.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	synstructure	`0.13.2`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.16`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.16`	indirect
crates.io	thread_local	`1.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	time	`0.3.47`	indirect
crates.io	time-core	`0.1.8`	indirect
crates.io	time-macros	`0.2.27`	indirect
crates.io	tinystr	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	tinyvec	`1.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	tinyvec_macros	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	tokio	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tokio	`1.53.1`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-macros	`2.7.2`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-tungstenite	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-tungstenite	`0.30.0`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-util	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-util	`0.7.19`	indirect
crates.io	tracing	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tracing	`0.1.44`	indirect
crates.io	tracing-attributes	`0.1.31`	indirect
crates.io	tracing-core	`0.1.36`	indirect
crates.io	tracing-log	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	tracing-subscriber	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tracing-subscriber	`0.3.23`	indirect
crates.io	tungstenite	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tungstenite	`0.30.0`	indirect
crates.io	typenum	`1.20.1`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	untrusted	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	url	`—`	indirect
crates.io	url	`2.5.8`	indirect
crates.io	utf8_iter	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	uuid	`—`	indirect
crates.io	uuid	`1.24.1`	indirect
crates.io	valuable	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.14.2+wasi-0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-backend	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-macro-support	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-bindgen-shared	`0.2.100`	indirect
crates.io	web-time	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.52.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.60.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.53.3`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.53.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rt	`0.39.0`	indirect
crates.io	writeable	`0.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	wtransport	`—`	indirect
crates.io	wtransport	`0.7.2`	indirect
crates.io	wtransport-proto	`0.7.2`	indirect
crates.io	x509-parser	`0.18.1`	indirect
crates.io	yasna	`0.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	yoke	`0.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	yoke-derive	`0.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.8.26`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.8.26`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom-derive	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	zeroize	`1.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	zerotrie	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec	`0.11.4`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec-derive	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.23`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`—`	indirect
PyPI	click	`—`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`—`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`—`	indirect
PyPI	flask	`—`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib	`—`	indirect
PyPI	mcp	`—`	indirect
PyPI	numpy	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pexpect	`—`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pymongo	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pyserial	`—`	indirect
PyPI	python-socketio	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pyusb	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pyvisa	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pyvisa-py	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`—`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`—`	indirect
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`—`	indirect
PyPI	scipy	`—`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`—`	indirect
PyPI	simplejson	`—`	indirect
PyPI	tenacity	`—`	indirect
PyPI	texttable	`—`	indirect
PyPI	textual	`—`	indirect
PyPI	trio	`—`	indirect
PyPI	trio-websocket	`—`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`—`	indirect
PyPI	websocket-client	`—`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`—`	indirect
PyPI	wsproto	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:lager-cli@0.40.0 pulls in 38 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records