Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-13 20:57 UTC

laminas / laminas-cache-storage-adapter-test

Testing utilities for laminas-cache adapters

PHPBSD-3-Clause★ 1 star⑂ 10 forkssince May 2020View on GitHub ↗

laminas/laminas-cache-storage-adapter-test holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (49/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Laminas ProjectOrganization
451 followers137 public repossince Feb 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistlaminas/laminas-cache-storage-adapter-test4.3.072621156 days agocachetestlaminas

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
22.2/36Commit cadence32/52 weeks with commits
14.1/18Commit volume36 commits in the last year
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
commits_last_year36
human_commit_share0.46
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year32
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases21 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 156 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~146.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count21
latest_release_tag4.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release156
mean_days_between_releases146.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
8/25Forks10 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars1
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
38.2/80Monthly downloads726 downloads/month across packagist
8.2/20Registry dependents16 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageslaminas/laminas-cache-storage-adapter-test
dependents16
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads56,708
monthly_downloads726
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

79Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 26% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth36 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 48 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled36
top_contributor_share0.262
How it's scored
30/42Issue resolution71% of issues closed
25.5/30PR acceptance102/120 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs102
open_issues2
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.714
closed_unmerged_prs18
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
19.1/25Owner reach451 followers of laminas
25/25Track record137 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers451
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginlaminas
public_repos137
account_age_days2,730
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 156 days ago
20/20Version history21 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslaminas/laminas-cache-storage-adapter-test
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish156

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpcs.xml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 48 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
4.5/7.5Maintained8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages86
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 86 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history42 of 46 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.913
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpcs.xml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance54 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.54
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/26 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes38,237
source_files_sampled26
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
36contributors
36commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
21releases
2bus factor
2open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 10 ⇿
0Stars
10Forks
17Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468101012020-112022-122024-12
Major 3Minor 8Patch 6

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-13 20:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 48 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
6Maintained8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistlaminas/laminas-cache^4.2.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/cache^2.0 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/clock^1.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/container^2.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/simple-cache^2.0 || ^3.0composer.json
All dependencies 86

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 81 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistlaminas/laminas-cache4.3.0direct
Packagistpsr/cache3.0.0direct
Packagistpsr/clock1.0.0direct
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2direct
Packagistpsr/simple-cache3.0.0direct
Packagistamphp/amp3.1.3indirect
Packagistamphp/byte-stream2.1.2indirect
Packagistamphp/cache2.0.1indirect
Packagistamphp/dns2.4.0indirect
Packagistamphp/parallel2.4.0indirect
Packagistamphp/parser1.1.1indirect
Packagistamphp/pipeline1.2.7indirect
Packagistamphp/process2.1.0indirect
Packagistamphp/serialization1.1.0indirect
Packagistamphp/socket2.4.0indirect
Packagistamphp/sync2.3.0indirect
Packagistbrick/varexporter0.6.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdanog/advanced-json-rpc3.2.3indirect
Packagistdaverandom/libdns2.1.0indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.2.1indirect
Packagistdnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir0.1.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.6indirect
Packagistfelixfbecker/language-server-protocol1.5.3indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistkelunik/certificate1.1.3indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-coding-standard3.1.0indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-eventmanager3.15.0indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-servicemanager4.5.1indirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-stdlib3.21.0indirect
Packagistleague/uri7.8.1indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces7.8.1indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.14.0indirect
Packagistnetresearch/jsonmapper5.0.1indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.8.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock6.0.3indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver2.0.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage10.1.16indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator4.1.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker4.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template3.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit10.5.64indirect
Packagistpsalm/plugin-phpunit0.19.7indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistrevolt/event-loop1.0.9indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser2.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit2.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator5.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity3.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff5.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment6.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter5.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context5.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/type4.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version4.0.1indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard8.22.1indirect
Packagistspatie/array-to-xml3.4.4indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer3.13.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.16indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem7.4.15indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.4.15indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.3.1indirect
Packagistvimeo/psalm6.16.1indirect
Packagistwebimpress/coding-standard1.4.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert2.4.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 86 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.