Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-05 07:50 UTC

laminas / laminas-diagnostics

A set of components for performing diagnostic tests in PHP applications

PHPBSD-3-Clause★ 85 stars⑂ 32 forkssince Dec 2019View on GitHub ↗

#hacktoberfest #diagnostic-tool #diagnostics

laminas/laminas-diagnostics holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (80/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (39/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Laminas ProjectOrganization

451 followers137 public repossince Feb 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	laminas/laminas-diagnostics	1.30.1	117,317	42	154 days ago	php test diagnostics laminas

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

75Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
20/36	Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits, discounted for automation: 33 of the last 100 commits human-authored, spanning 154 days
12.6/18	Commit volume — 49 commits in the last year, discounted for automation: 33 of the last 100 commits human-authored, spanning 154 days
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

commits_last_year	49
human_commit_share	0.33
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	35

Release discipline

74Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 26 releases published
27/36	Release recency — latest release 154 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~130.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	26
latest_release_tag	1.30.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	154
mean_days_between_releases	130.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

71Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

50Moderate

How it's scored

31.2/60	Stars — 85 stars
12.4/25	Forks — 32 forks
6.7/15	Watchers — 17 watchers

Inputs used

forks	32
stars	85
watchers	17
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	1
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

75Good

How it's scored

67.6/80	Monthly downloads — 117,317 downloads/month across packagist
7.4/20	Registry dependents — 12 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	laminas/laminas-diagnostics
dependents	12
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	7,404,196
monthly_downloads	117,317

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

85Excellent

How it's scored

43.2/54	Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 18% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 50 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 75 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	4
contributors_sampled	50
top_contributor_share	0.184

Issue & PR responsiveness

64Moderate

How it's scored

32.3/42	Issue resolution — 77% of issues closed
22.2/30	PR acceptance — 57/77 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	57
open_issues	3
closed_issues	10
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.769
closed_unmerged_prs	20
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

74Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
19.1/25	Owner reach — 451 followers of laminas
25/25	Track record — 137 public repos, account ~7 yr old

Inputs used

followers	451
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	laminas
public_repos	137
account_age_days	2,721

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 154 days ago
20/20	Version history — 42 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	laminas/laminas-diagnostics
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	154

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.laminas.dev/laminas-diagnostics/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	hacktoberfest, diagnostic-tool, diagnostics
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://docs.laminas.dev/laminas-diagnostics/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

58Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 75 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
4.5/7.5	Maintained — 8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	5.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): dangerous_workflow, packaging, pinned_dependencies, signed_releases, token_permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	87
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 87 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

24At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24.2/40	Legible commit history — 15 of 33 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
legible_history_share	0.455
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 67 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.67

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/78 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	34,139
source_files_sampled	78
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

85GitHub stars

50contributors

49commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

26releases

4bus factor

3open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 32 ⇿

0Stars

32Forks

25Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 24Patch 1

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10

5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-05 07:49 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 75 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
6	Maintained	8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 87

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 87 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	amphp/amp	`2.6.5`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/byte-stream	`1.8.2`	indirect
Packagist	composer/package-versions-deprecated	`1.11.99.5`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer	`1.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	dnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir	`0.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/dbal	`4.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/deprecations	`1.1.6`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/event-manager	`2.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/instantiator	`2.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/migrations	`3.9.7`	indirect
Packagist	enlightn/security-checker	`1.11.0`	indirect
Packagist	felixfbecker/advanced-json-rpc	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	felixfbecker/language-server-protocol	`1.5.3`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/guzzle	`7.15.2`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/promises	`2.5.1`	indirect
Packagist	guzzlehttp/psr7	`2.13.0`	indirect
Packagist	laminas/laminas-coding-standard	`3.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	mikey179/vfsstream	`1.6.12`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.13.4`	indirect
Packagist	netresearch/jsonmapper	`4.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`4.19.5`	indirect
Packagist	openlss/lib-array2xml	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	paragonie/constant_time_encoding	`3.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	paragonie/random_compat	`9.99.100`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-amqplib/php-amqplib	`3.7.4`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-common	`2.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock	`5.6.7`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/type-resolver	`1.12.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpseclib/phpseclib	`3.0.56`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`2.3.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`9.2.32`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`3.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`3.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`5.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`9.6.35`	indirect
Packagist	predis/predis	`3.5.1`	indirect
Packagist	psalm/plugin-phpunit	`0.18.4`	indirect
Packagist	psr/cache	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-client	`1.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	ralouphie/getallheaders	`3.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`1.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit	`1.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`4.0.10`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`4.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`5.1.5`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`4.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`5.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`1.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`4.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`4.0.6`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/resource-operations	`3.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	slevomat/coding-standard	`8.22.1`	indirect
Packagist	squizlabs/php_codesniffer	`3.13.5`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`6.4.43`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/finder	`7.4.14`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.41.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.38.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.38.2`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php80	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/process	`7.4.13`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/stopwatch	`7.4.8`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`7.4.15`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/var-exporter	`7.4.14`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`7.4.15`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`1.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	vimeo/psalm	`4.30.0`	indirect
Packagist	webimpress/coding-standard	`1.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`1.12.1`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/path-util	`2.3.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 87 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Related records