Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-23 11:34 UTC

laravel-zero / framework

This repository contains the core code of Laravel Zero

PHPMIT★ 349 stars⑂ 64 forkssince Jul 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

laravel-zero/framework holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (70/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (41/100). It was last updated 30 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Laravel ZeroOrganization
96 followers9 public repossince Sep 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistlaravel-zero/frameworkv12.1.056,212170120 days agoframeworkcliconsolelaravellaravel-zero

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 30 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
13.6/18Commit volume32 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year32
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push30
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases16 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 120 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~59.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tagv12.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release120
mean_days_between_releases59.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
41.2/60Stars349 stars
15/25Forks64 forks
6.5/15Watchers16 watchers
Inputs used
forks64
stars349
watchers16
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
63.3/80Monthly downloads56,212 downloads/month across packagist
17.4/20Registry dependents409 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageslaravel-zero/framework
dependents409
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,593,723
monthly_downloads56,212
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 63% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth54 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 39 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled54
top_contributor_share0.634
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
14.5/30PR acceptance250/519 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs250
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs269
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
14.3/25Owner reach96 followers of laravel-zero
19.3/25Track record9 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers96
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginlaravel-zero
public_repos9
account_age_days3,244
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 120 days ago
20/20Version history170 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslaravel-zero/framework
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish120

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

69Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests13 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://laravel-zero.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaravel-zero, framework, php, hacktoberfest
has_wikino
homepagehttps://laravel-zero.com
docs_sitehttps://laravel-zero.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests13 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 39 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

41Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
39.6/40Legible commit history72 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.742
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/112 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes8,117
source_files_sampled112
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

349GitHub stars
54contributors
32commits, last 12 months
30days since last push
16releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 64 ⇿
0Stars
64Forks
16Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756422017-072022-012026-06
Major 2Minor 5Patch 9

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-23 11:33 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests13 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 39 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
1SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 30
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression^3.6composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.10.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/cache^12.58.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/collections^12.58.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/config^12.58.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/console^12.58.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/container^12.58.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/contracts^12.58.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/events^12.58.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/filesystem^12.58.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/process^12.58.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/support^12.58.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/testing^12.58.0composer.json
Packagistlaravel-zero/foundation^12.54.1composer.json
Packagistlaravel/prompts^0.3.17composer.json
Packagistleague/flysystem^3.33.0composer.json
Packagistnunomaduro/collision^8.9.4composer.json
Packagistnunomaduro/laravel-console-summary^1.14.0composer.json
Packagistnunomaduro/laravel-console-task^1.11composer.json
Packagistnunomaduro/laravel-desktop-notifier^2.10.0composer.json
Packagistnunomaduro/termwind^2.4.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^3.0.2composer.json
Packagistramsey/uuid^4.9.2composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^7.4.9composer.json
Packagistsymfony/error-handler^7.4.8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher^7.4.9composer.json
Packagistsymfony/finder^7.4.8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/process^7.4.8composer.json
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper^7.4.8composer.json
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv^5.6.3composer.json
All dependencies 46

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 30 direct and 16 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expressiondirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzledirect
Packagistilluminate/cachedirect
Packagistilluminate/collectionsdirect
Packagistilluminate/configdirect
Packagistilluminate/consoledirect
Packagistilluminate/containerdirect
Packagistilluminate/contractsdirect
Packagistilluminate/eventsdirect
Packagistilluminate/filesystemdirect
Packagistilluminate/processdirect
Packagistilluminate/supportdirect
Packagistilluminate/testingdirect
Packagistlaravel-zero/foundationdirect
Packagistlaravel/promptsdirect
Packagistleague/flysystemdirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collisiondirect
Packagistnunomaduro/laravel-console-summarydirect
Packagistnunomaduro/laravel-console-taskdirect
Packagistnunomaduro/laravel-desktop-notifierdirect
Packagistnunomaduro/termwinddirect
Packagistpsr/logdirect
Packagistramsey/uuiddirect
Packagistsymfony/consoledirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handlerdirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcherdirect
Packagistsymfony/finderdirect
Packagistsymfony/processdirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumperdirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenvdirect
Packagistext-jsonindirect
Packagistilluminate/busindirect
Packagistilluminate/databaseindirect
Packagistilluminate/httpindirect
Packagistilluminate/logindirect
Packagistilluminate/queueindirect
Packagistilluminate/redisindirect
Packagistilluminate/viewindirect
Packagistlaravel-zero/phar-updaterindirect
Packagistlaravel/mcpindirect
Packagistlaravel/pintindirect
Packagistnunomaduro/laravel-console-duskindirect
Packagistnunomaduro/laravel-console-menuindirect
Packagistpestphp/pestindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.