Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 11:59 UTC

lcobucci / jwt

A simple library to work with JSON Web Token and JSON Web Signature

PHPBSD-3-Clause★ 7,483 stars⑂ 595 forkssince Mar 2014View on GitHub ↗

lcobucci/jwt holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (88/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (40/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Luís CobucciPersonal account
1,123 followers82 public repossince Feb 2010@mollie

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistlcobucci/jwt5.6.08,771,69462309 days agojwtjws

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
29.8/36Commit cadence43/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume207 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year207
human_commit_share0.14
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year43
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases59 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 309 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~107.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count59
latest_release_tag5.6.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release309
mean_days_between_releases107.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

88Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars7,483 stars
23.1/25Forks595 forks
11.7/15Watchers130 watchers
Inputs used
forks595
stars7,483
watchers130
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads8,771,694 downloads/month across packagist
20/20Registry dependents1,029 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageslcobucci/jwt
dependents1,029
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads353,283,430
monthly_downloads8,771,694
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 73% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth53 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 28 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled53
top_contributor_share0.733
How it's scored
41.1/42Issue resolution98% of issues closed
24.4/30PR acceptance610/749 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs610
open_issues8
closed_issues380
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.979
closed_unmerged_prs139
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
21.9/25Owner reach1,123 followers of lcobucci
25/25Track record82 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,123
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginlcobucci
public_repos82
account_age_days6,035
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 309 days ago
20/20Version history62 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslcobucci/jwt
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish309

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://lcobucci-jwt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, jwt, tokens, hacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://lcobucci-jwt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
docs_sitehttps://lcobucci-jwt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 28 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages80
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 80 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

40Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance86 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.86
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/137 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes17,534
source_files_sampled137
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

7,483GitHub stars
53contributors
207commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
59releases
1bus factor
8open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 595 ⇿
0Stars
595Forks
58Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0100200300400500600581122014-052020-062026-07
Major 3Minor 14Patch 37

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 11:59 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 28 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistpsr/clock^1.0composer.json
All dependencies 80

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 79 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistpsr/clock1.0.0direct
Packagistcolinodell/json53.0.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.2.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/annotations2.0.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/coding-standard14.0.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistinfection/abstract-testframework-adapter0.5.1indirect
Packagistinfection/extension-installer0.1.2indirect
Packagistinfection/include-interceptor1.0.0indirect
Packagistinfection/infection0.35.2indirect
Packagistinfection/mutator0.4.1indirect
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema6.10.0indirect
Packagistlcobucci/clock3.6.0indirect
Packagistlcobucci/coding-standard12.0.0indirect
Packagistmarc-mabe/php-enum4.7.2indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.14.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.8.0indirect
Packagistondram/ci-detector4.2.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpbench/container2.2.3indirect
Packagistphpbench/phpbench1.7.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer1.4.3indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.3indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.2.8indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rules2.0.5indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit2.0.18indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rules2.0.12indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage14.3.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator7.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker7.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer9.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit13.3.1indirect
Packagistpsr/cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistsanmai/di-container0.2indirect
Packagistsanmai/duoclock0.1.3indirect
Packagistsanmai/later0.1.7indirect
Packagistsanmai/pipeline7.10indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser5.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator8.4.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity6.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff9.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment9.3.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter8.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/file-filter1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/git-state1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state9.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code5.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator8.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector6.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context8.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type7.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/version7.0.0indirect
Packagistseld/jsonlint1.12.1indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard8.31.0indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.1indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/console8.1.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder8.1.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php851.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/process8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string8.1.0indirect
Packagistthecodingmachine/safe3.4.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer2.0.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert2.4.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/glob4.7.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 80 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
squizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.1indirecthigh14.0.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.