Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 00:48 UTC

lihengming / spring-boot-api-project-seed

:seedling::rocket:一个基于Spring Boot & MyBatis的种子项目,用于快速构建中小型API、RESTful API项目~

Java · FreeMarkerNo license detected★ 9,692 stars⑂ 3,719 forkssince Jun 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

lihengming/spring-boot-api-project-seed holds a health index of 18 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (65/100) and lowest on Security (16/100). It was last updated 984 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

18
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

18
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 36 is calibrated to 30 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

土豆Personal account
1,504 followers24 public repossince Mar 2016Alibaba

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

25At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 984 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push984
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases4 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 3,321 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~8.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagV1.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3,321
mean_days_between_releases8.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

100Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars9,692 stars
25/25Forks3,719 forks
14.7/15Watchers438 watchers
Inputs used
forks3,719
stars9,692
watchers438
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

35Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
22.3/42Issue resolution53% of issues closed
1.6/30PR acceptance1/19 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues93
closed_issues105
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.53
closed_unmerged_prs18
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
22.8/25Owner reach1,504 followers of lihengming
22.2/25Track record24 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,504
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginlihengming
public_repos24
account_age_days3,822
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

38Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjava, spring-boot, api, seed, rest, restful, mybatis, mapper, mybatis-pagehelper
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

16Critical · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities177 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate1.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
4/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories5 affected: com.alibaba:fastjson 1.2.47 (critical 10.0), com.github.pagehelper:pagehelper 4.2.1 (critical 9.8), org.mybatis:mybatis 3.4.5 (high 8.1), +2 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
19.9/40No advisories left outstanding5 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,264 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories8
affected_packages5
assessed_packages10
unassessed_packages6
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 1, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 10 resolved dependencies against OSV. 6 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
10.1/40Legible commit history19 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.19
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrappom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingJava (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestspom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeJava (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/13 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes11,279
source_files_sampled13
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

9,692GitHub stars
1contributors
0commits, last 12 months
984days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
93open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-07: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 9692 stars today.
  • Could not fetch maven package 'com.github.lihengming:spring-boot-api-project-seed' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 9,700 ★ / 3,719 ⇿
9,700Stars
3,719Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-07. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

2,0004,0006,0008,00010,0009,7003,7191212020-042023-062026-08

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.2 / 10
1.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 00:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities177 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-webpom.xml
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-jdbcpom.xml
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codecpom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.6pom.xml
Mavencom.google.guava:guava23.0pom.xml
Mavenmysql:mysql-connector-javapom.xml
Mavenorg.mybatis:mybatis-spring1.3.1pom.xml
Mavenorg.mybatis:mybatis3.4.5pom.xml
Maventk.mybatis:mapper3.4.2pom.xml
Mavencom.github.pagehelper:pagehelper4.2.1pom.xml
Mavencom.alibaba:fastjson1.2.47pom.xml
Mavencom.alibaba:druid-spring-boot-starter1.1.10pom.xml
All dependencies 16

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 4 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.alibaba:druid-spring-boot-starter1.1.10direct
Mavencom.alibaba:fastjson1.2.47direct
Mavencom.github.pagehelper:pagehelper4.2.1direct
Mavencom.google.guava:guava23.0direct
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codecdirect
Mavenmysql:mysql-connector-javadirect
Mavenorg.apache.commons:commons-lang33.6direct
Mavenorg.mybatis:mybatis3.4.5direct
Mavenorg.mybatis:mybatis-spring1.3.1direct
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-jdbcdirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-webdirect
Maventk.mybatis:mapper3.4.2direct
Mavenorg.freemarker:freemarker2.3.23indirect
Mavenorg.mybatis.generator:mybatis-generator-core1.3.5indirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-testindirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 10 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 5 are direct. 6 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
com.alibaba:fastjson1.2.47directcritical21.2.83
com.github.pagehelper:pagehelper4.2.1directcritical15.3.1
org.mybatis:mybatis3.4.5directhigh13.5.6
com.google.guava:guava23.0directmoderate332.0.0-android
org.apache.commons:commons-lang33.6directmoderate13.18.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.