Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-23 19:43 UTC

limosa-io / laravel-scim-server

SCIM 2.0 Server implementation for Laravel

PHPMIT★ 98 stars⑂ 44 forkssince Dec 2017View on GitHub ↗

limosa-io/laravel-scim-server holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (72/100) and lowest on Security (45/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LimosaOrganization
11 followers7 public repossince Jan 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistarietimmerman/laravel-scim-serverv1.5.115,7046891 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence11/52 weeks with commits
16.5/18Commit volume67 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year67
human_commit_share0.89
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year11
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases18 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 91 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~23.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count18
latest_release_tagv1.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release91
mean_days_between_releases23.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32.2/60Stars98 stars
13.6/25Forks44 forks
5/15Watchers9 watchers
Inputs used
forks44
stars98
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
55.9/80Monthly downloads15,704 downloads/month across packagist
3.2/20Registry dependents2 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesarietimmerman/laravel-scim-server
dependents2
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads439,635
monthly_downloads15,704
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 88% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth11 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled11
top_contributor_share0.875
How it's scored
39.9/42Issue resolution95% of issues closed
27.2/30PR acceptance97/107 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs97
open_issues3
closed_issues58
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.951
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
7.8/25Owner reach11 followers of limosa-io
15.7/25Track record7 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers11
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginlimosa-io
public_repos7
account_age_days1,661
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 91 days ago
20/20Version history68 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesarietimmerman/laravel-scim-server
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish91

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests8 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsscim, scim2, laravel, identity-management, rest-api
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests8 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories24
affected_packages10
assessed_packages134
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 3, moderate 6, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 134 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36.6/40Legible commit history61 of 89 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.685
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/81 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes27,848
source_files_sampled81
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

98GitHub stars
11contributors
67commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
18releases
1bus factor
3open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 44 ⇿
0Stars
44Forks
16Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0102030403912019-072022-112026-04
Major 1Minor 2Patch 13

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-23 19:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests8 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/database^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/support^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/console^10.0|^11.0|^12.0|^13.0composer.json
All dependencies 134

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 134 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbrick/math0.14.8indirect
Packagistcarbonphp/carbon-doctrine-types3.2.0indirect
Packagistclue/ndjson-react1.3.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.3.2indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-data3.0.3indirect
Packagistdoctrine/inflector2.1.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression3.6.0indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator4.0.4indirect
Packagistergebnis/agent-detector1.1.1indirect
Packagistevenement/evenement3.0.2indirect
Packagistfakerphp/faker1.24.1indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistfilp/whoops2.18.4indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer3.95.1indirect
Packagistfruitcake/php-cors1.4.0indirect
Packagistgraham-campbell/result-type1.1.4indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.10.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.3.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.9.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/uri-template1.0.5indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php2.1.1indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework13.6.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/legacy-factories1.4.2indirect
Packagistlaravel/pail1.2.6indirect
Packagistlaravel/prompts0.3.17indirect
Packagistlaravel/serializable-closure2.0.12indirect
Packagistlaravel/tinker3.0.2indirect
Packagistleague/commonmark2.8.2indirect
Packagistleague/config1.2.0indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem3.33.0indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem-local3.31.0indirect
Packagistleague/mime-type-detection1.16.0indirect
Packagistleague/uri7.8.1indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces7.8.1indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery1.6.12indirect
Packagistmonolog/monolog3.10.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnesbot/carbon3.11.4indirect
Packagistnette/schema1.3.5indirect
Packagistnette/utils4.1.3indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.7.0indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision8.9.4indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/termwind2.4.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas11.0.1indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas-core11.0.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/sidekick1.2.20indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench11.1.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core11.2.1indirect
Packagistorchestra/workbench11.1.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpoption/phpoption1.9.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage14.1.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator7.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker7.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer9.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit13.1.7indirect
Packagistpsr/clock1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsy/psysh0.12.22indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistramsey/collection2.1.1indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid4.9.2indirect
Packagistreact/cache1.2.0indirect
Packagistreact/child-process0.6.7indirect
Packagistreact/dns1.14.0indirect
Packagistreact/event-loop1.6.0indirect
Packagistreact/promise3.3.0indirect
Packagistreact/socket1.17.0indirect
Packagistreact/stream1.4.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator8.1.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity6.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff8.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment9.3.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter8.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/git-state1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state9.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator8.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector6.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context8.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/type7.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version7.0.0indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/clock8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/console8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handler8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder7.4.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/mailer8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php811.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php831.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php851.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-uuid1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.6.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/string8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts3.6.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/uid8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml8.0.8indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer2.0.1indirect
Packagisttijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles2.4.0indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv5.6.3indirect
Packagistvoku/portable-ascii2.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 10

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 134 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 10 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
laravel/framework13.6.0indirecthigh213.12.0
symfony/http-kernel8.0.8indirecthigh18.0.12
symfony/mailer8.0.8indirecthigh18.0.12
guzzlehttp/guzzle7.10.0indirectmoderate77.15.1
guzzlehttp/psr72.9.0indirectmoderate42.12.3
symfony/mime8.0.8indirectmoderate28.0.12
symfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.36.0indirectmoderate11.38.1
symfony/routing8.0.8indirectmoderate28.0.13
symfony/yaml8.0.8indirectmoderate38.0.12
symfony/http-foundation8.0.8indirectlow18.0.13

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.