Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 05:43 UTC

llm011 / ethan-agent

A lightweight, high-performance personal AI agent. Fast async core, pluggable tools, and open integration with external agent ecosystems (Claude Code, Codex, MCP). Simple to configure, easy to extend.

Python · TypeScriptMIT★ 9 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolDesktop applicationWeb interfaceNetwork serviceMCP serverMobile applicationhow this is determined

llm011/ethan-agent holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (77/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (40/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

llm011Organization
0 followers5 public repossince May 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIethan-agent0.5.24410,8543302 days agoagentaiassistantclaudegeminillmmemoryskills

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

63Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
9/36Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 934 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year934
human_commit_share0.52
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year13

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.2 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.5.244
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases0.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

15Critical
How it's scored
14.6/60Stars — 9 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars9
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

67Good
How it's scored
53.8/80Monthly downloads — 10,854 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesethan-agent
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads10,854
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

21At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.92

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
27.9/30PR acceptance — 288/310 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs288
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d28
prs_decided_7d28
prs_merged_30d57
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs22
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

36Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of llm011
6.2/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginllm011
public_repos5
account_age_days101

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 330 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesethan-agent
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

32At Risk
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 91 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.2

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages73
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:ethan-agent@0.5.244 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 73 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md, ethan/defaults/system/agent.md, web/AGENTS.md, web/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 52 of 52 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, ethan/defaults/system/agent.md, web/AGENTS.md, web/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,589

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

76Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — ethan/defaults/skills/research-paper-writing/templates/neurips2025/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — browser-extension/tsconfig.json, desktop/tsconfig.json, ethan/defaults/skills/article-to-video/assets/open-motion-template/tsconfig.json, packages/shared/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesethan/defaults/skills/research-paper-writing/templates/neurips2025/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsbrowser-extension/tsconfig.json, desktop/tsconfig.json, ethan/defaults/skills/article-to-video/assets/open-motion-template/tsconfig.json, packages/shared/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestsapp/android/app/build.gradle.kts, app/android/build.gradle.kts, app/android/core/datastore/build.gradle.kts, app/android/core/model/build.gradle.kts, app/android/core/network/build.gradle.kts, app/android/shared/build.gradle.kts, desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (browser-extension/tsconfig.json, desktop/tsconfig.json, ethan/defaults/skills/article-to-video/assets/open-motion-template/tsconfig.json, packages/shared/tsconfig.json, web/tsconfig.json)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 12/886 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes311,853
source_files_sampled886
oversized_source_files12

Machine-readable interfaces

60Moderate
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

9GitHub stars
5contributors
934commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 05:43 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
8Signed-Releases5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities91 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 82
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmhighlight.js^11.11.1browser-extension/package.json
npm@a2ui/markdown-it^0.1.0desktop/package.json
npm@a2ui/react^0.10.1desktop/package.json
npm@a2ui/web_core^0.10.4desktop/package.json
npm@base-ui/react^1.6.0desktop/package.json
npm@ethan/sharedworkspace:*desktop/package.json
npm@tauri-apps/api^2.11.1desktop/package.json
npm@tauri-apps/plugin-shell^2.3.5desktop/package.json
npm@tauri-apps/plugin-updater^2.10.1desktop/package.json
npm@tauri-apps/plugin-dialog^2.7.2desktop/package.json
npm@tauri-apps/plugin-process^2.3.1desktop/package.json
npm@types/react-syntax-highlighter^15.5.13desktop/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1desktop/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1desktop/package.json
npmcmdk^1.1.1desktop/package.json
npmdate-fns^4.4.0desktop/package.json
npmhtml-to-image^1.11.13desktop/package.json
npmjspdf^4.2.1desktop/package.json
npmkatex^0.18.1desktop/package.json
npmlucide-react^1.24.0desktop/package.json
npmmermaid^11.4.0desktop/package.json
npmreact^19.2.7desktop/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.7desktop/package.json
npmreact-markdown^10.1.0desktop/package.json
npmreact-router-dom^7.18.1desktop/package.json
npmreact-syntax-highlighter^16.1.1desktop/package.json
npmrehype-highlight^7.0.2desktop/package.json
npmremark-breaks^4.0.0desktop/package.json
npmremark-gfm^4.0.1desktop/package.json
npmshadcn^4.13.0desktop/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0desktop/package.json
npmtw-animate-css^1.4.0desktop/package.json
npm@tauri-apps/plugin-notification^2.2.2desktop/package.json
npm@tauri-apps/plugin-autostart^2.5.0desktop/package.json
PyPIaiosqlite>=0.22.1pyproject.toml
PyPIanthropic>=0.109.1pyproject.toml
PyPIapscheduler>=3.11.2pyproject.toml
PyPIcurl-cffi>=0.15.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.136.3pyproject.toml
PyPIlunar-python>=1.4.8pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.27.2pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.26.0pyproject.toml
PyPIonnxruntime>=1.18.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai>=2.41.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpexpect>=4.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIprompt-toolkit>=3.0.52pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-multipart>=0.0.32pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=15.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy>=2.0.50pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlite-vec>=0.1.9pyproject.toml
PyPItokenizers>=0.19.0pyproject.toml
PyPItyper>=0.26.7pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.49.0pyproject.toml
npm@a2ui/markdown-it^0.0.4web/package.json
npm@a2ui/react^0.10.1web/package.json
npm@a2ui/web_core^0.10.3web/package.json
npm@base-ui/react^1.5.0web/package.json
npm@ethan/sharedworkspace:*web/package.json
npm@types/react-syntax-highlighter^15.5.13web/package.json
npmai^6.0.201web/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1web/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1web/package.json
npmcmdk^1.1.1web/package.json
npmdate-fns^4.4.0web/package.json
npmhtml-to-image^1.11.13web/package.json
npmjspdf^4.2.1web/package.json
npmkatex^0.18.1web/package.json
npmlucide-react^1.17.0web/package.json
npmmermaid^11.4.0web/package.json
npmnext16.2.9web/package.json
npmreact19.2.7web/package.json
npmreact-dom19.2.7web/package.json
npmreact-markdown^10.1.0web/package.json
npmreact-syntax-highlighter^16.1.1web/package.json
npmrehype-highlight^7.0.2web/package.json
npmremark-breaks^4.0.0web/package.json
npmremark-gfm^4.0.1web/package.json
npmshadcn^4.11.0web/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0web/package.json
npmtw-animate-css^1.4.0web/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:ethan-agent@0.5.244 pulls in 73 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with llm011/ethan-agent. Read them side by side →

97langgenius/difyBuild Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.Exceptional96vercel/aiThe AI Toolkit for TypeScript. From the creators of Next.js, the AI SDK is a free open-source library for building AI-powered applications and agents Exceptional96CopilotKit/CopilotKitThe Frontend Stack for Agents & Generative UI. React, Angular, Mobile, Slack, and more. Makers of the AG-UI ProtocolExceptional96agentscope-ai/ReMeReMe: Memory Management Kit for Agents - Remember Me, Refine Me.Exceptional96AstrBotDevs/AstrBotAI Agent Assistant & development framework that integrates lots of IM platforms, LLMs, plugins and AI feature, and can be your openclaw alternative. ✨Exceptional96alpic-ai/skybridgeSkybridge is a full-stack TypeScript framework for MCP Apps and ChatGPT Apps. Type-safe. React-powered. Platform-agnostic.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.