Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 02:16 UTC

lobehub / lobe-editor

✒️ Lobe Editor - a modern, extensible rich text editor built on Meta's Lexical framework with dual-architecture design, featuring both a powerful kernel and React integration. Optimized for AI applications and chat interfaces.

JavaScript · TypeScriptMIT★ 167 stars⑂ 25 forkssince Jul 2025View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

#editor #lexical #lobehub

lobehub/lobe-editor holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Security (58/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LobeHubOrganization · verified domain

3,840 followers51 public repossince Apr 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@lobehub/editor	4.27.3	116,276	215	1 day ago	lobehub editor lexical
npm	nodeserverpoints to another repo — not scored	0.9.1	169	30	3237 days ago	server web http https ssl webserver apache nginx proxy reverse-proxy cgi php python nodejs static

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

93Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
29.1/36	Commit cadence — 42/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 417 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	417
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	42

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~2.5 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v4.27.3
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	2.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

60Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

48Weak

How it's scored

36/60	Stars — 167 stars
11.5/25	Forks — 25 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	25
stars	167
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

57Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

84Excellent

How it's scored

67.5/80	Monthly downloads — 116,276 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@lobehub/editor
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	116,276
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

57Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 40% of commits
8.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 17 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	6
top_contributor_share	0.404

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good

How it's scored

30.2/42	Issue resolution — 72% of issues closed
26.9/30	PR acceptance — 137/153 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	137
open_issues	11
closed_issues	28
prs_merged_7d	6
prs_decided_7d	6
prs_merged_30d	12
prs_decided_30d	13
issue_closed_ratio	0.718
closed_unmerged_prs	16
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

94Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 3,840 followers of lobehub
19.3/25	Track record — 51 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	3,840
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	lobehub
public_repos	51
account_age_days	1,240

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20	Version history — 215 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@lobehub/editor
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://editor.lobehub.com
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	editor, lexical, lobehub
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://editor.lobehub.com
docs_site	https://editor.lobehub.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

47Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	345
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@lobehub/editor@4.27.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 345 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — .cursor/rules/coding-standards.mdc, .cursor/rules/debug-logging.mdc, .cursor/rules/documentation-standards.mdc, .cursor/rules/environment-setup.mdc, .cursor/rules/hotkey-standards.mdc, .cursor/rules/plugin-development.mdc, .cursor/rules/project-structure.mdc, .cursor/rules/react-development.mdc
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 79 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.79
agent_instruction_files	.cursor/rules/coding-standards.mdc, .cursor/rules/debug-logging.mdc, .cursor/rules/documentation-standards.mdc, .cursor/rules/environment-setup.mdc, .cursor/rules/hotkey-standards.mdc, .cursor/rules/plugin-development.mdc, .cursor/rules/project-structure.mdc, .cursor/rules/react-development.mdc
agent_instruction_max_bytes	11,435

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

58Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11	Static type checking — examples/ai-collaboration-demo/tsconfig.json, examples/collaboration-business-demo/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
4/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	examples/ai-collaboration-demo/tsconfig.json, examples/collaboration-business-demo/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.02
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (examples/ai-collaboration-demo/tsconfig.json, examples/collaboration-business-demo/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json)
54.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/629 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	2,507,165
source_files_sampled	629
oversized_source_files	1

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — demos, examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	demos, examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

167GitHub stars

6contributors

417commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

2bus factor

11open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
npm package 'nodeserver' points at a different repository (https://github.com/altairstudios/nodeserver); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 25 ⇿

0Stars

25Forks

91Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 39Patch 51

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10

4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 02:15 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4	Vulnerabilities	6 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 43

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	body-parser	`^1.20.3`	nodeserver/package.json
npm	express	`^4.21.2`	nodeserver/package.json
npm	openai	`^6.9.0`	nodeserver/package.json
npm	@floating-ui/dom	`^1.8.0`	package.json
npm	@floating-ui/react	`^0.27.20`	package.json
npm	@lexical/clipboard	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/code-core	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/dragon	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/headless	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/history	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/link	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/list	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/rich-text	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/selection	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/table	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/utils	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	@lexical/yjs	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	@shikijs/core	`^4.3.1`	package.json
npm	@shikijs/engine-javascript	`^4.3.1`	package.json
npm	@xmldom/xmldom	`^0.9.10`	package.json
npm	ahooks	`^3.9.6`	package.json
npm	antd-style	`^4.1.0`	package.json
npm	debug	`^4.4.3`	package.json
npm	es-toolkit	`^1.50.0`	package.json
npm	eventemitter3	`^5.0.1`	package.json
npm	fuse.js	`^7.5.0`	package.json
npm	katex	`^0.18.1`	package.json
npm	lexical	`0.42.0`	package.json
npm	lucide-react	`^1.26.0`	package.json
npm	mermaid	`^11.16.0`	package.json
npm	polished	`^4.3.1`	package.json
npm	re-resizable	`^6.11.2`	package.json
npm	react-error-boundary	`^6.1.2`	package.json
npm	react-merge-refs	`^3.0.2`	package.json
npm	remark	`^15.0.1`	package.json
npm	remark-cjk-friendly	`^1.2.3`	package.json
npm	remark-gfm	`^4.0.1`	package.json
npm	remark-math	`^6.0.0`	package.json
npm	remark-supersub	`^1.0.0`	package.json
npm	shiki	`^4.3.1`	package.json
npm	ts-key-enum	`^3.0.13`	package.json
npm	use-merge-value	`^1.2.0`	package.json
npm	yjs	`^13.6.31`	package.json

All dependencies 155

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 44 direct and 111 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@floating-ui/dom	`^1.8.0`	direct
npm	@floating-ui/react	`^0.27.20`	direct
npm	@lexical/clipboard	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/code-core	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/dragon	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/headless	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/history	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/link	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/list	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/rich-text	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/selection	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/table	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/utils	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	@lexical/yjs	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	@shikijs/core	`^4.3.1`	direct
npm	@shikijs/engine-javascript	`^4.3.1`	direct
npm	@xmldom/xmldom	`^0.9.10`	direct
npm	ahooks	`^3.9.6`	direct
npm	antd-style	`^4.1.0`	direct
npm	body-parser	`1.20.3`	direct
npm	debug	`2.6.9`	direct
npm	debug	`^4.4.3`	direct
npm	es-toolkit	`^1.50.0`	direct
npm	eventemitter3	`^5.0.1`	direct
npm	express	`4.21.2`	direct
npm	fuse.js	`^7.5.0`	direct
npm	katex	`^0.18.1`	direct
npm	lexical	`0.42.0`	direct
npm	lucide-react	`^1.26.0`	direct
npm	mermaid	`^11.16.0`	direct
npm	openai	`6.9.0`	direct
npm	polished	`^4.3.1`	direct
npm	re-resizable	`^6.11.2`	direct
npm	react-error-boundary	`^6.1.2`	direct
npm	react-merge-refs	`^3.0.2`	direct
npm	remark	`^15.0.1`	direct
npm	remark-cjk-friendly	`^1.2.3`	direct
npm	remark-gfm	`^4.0.1`	direct
npm	remark-math	`^6.0.0`	direct
npm	remark-supersub	`^1.0.0`	direct
npm	shiki	`^4.3.1`	direct
npm	ts-key-enum	`^3.0.13`	direct
npm	use-merge-value	`^1.2.0`	direct
npm	yjs	`^13.6.31`	direct
npm	@commitlint/cli	`^19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@emotion/is-prop-valid	`^1.4.0`	indirect
npm	@hono/node-server	`^1.14.4`	indirect
npm	@lobehub/docs-kit	`^5.23.4`	indirect
npm	@lobehub/lint	`^2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@lobehub/ui	`^5.29.1`	indirect
npm	@react-router/dev	`8.2.0`	indirect
npm	@shikijs/types	`^4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/debug	`^4.1.12`	indirect
npm	@types/mdast	`^4.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`^24.13.3`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`^25.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`^19.2.17`	indirect
npm	@types/react-dom	`^19.2.3`	indirect
npm	@types/unist	`^3.0.3`	indirect
npm	@types/ws	`^8.18.1`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-react	`^5.1.1`	indirect
npm	@vitest/coverage-v8	`^4.1.10`	indirect
npm	accepts	`1.3.8`	indirect
npm	antd	`^6.5.2`	indirect
npm	array-flatten	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	bytes	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bound	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	clean-package	`^2.2.0`	indirect
npm	content-disposition	`0.5.4`	indirect
npm	content-type	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	cookie	`0.7.1`	indirect
npm	cookie-signature	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	depd	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	destroy	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	dpdm	`^4.2.0`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	ee-first	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	escape-html	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	eslint	`^10.7.0`	indirect
npm	etag	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	finalhandler	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	forwarded	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	fresh	`0.5.2`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	hono	`^4.10.7`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	husky	`^9.1.7`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.4.24`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ipaddr.js	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	jsdom	`^29.1.1`	indirect
npm	leva	`^0.10.1`	indirect
npm	lint-staged	`^17.2.0`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	media-typer	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	merge-descriptors	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	methods	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	mime	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	motion	`^12.42.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	negotiator	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	on-finished	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	parseurl	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`0.1.12`	indirect
npm	prettier	`^3.9.6`	indirect
npm	proxy-addr	`2.0.7`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.13.0`	indirect
npm	range-parser	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	raw-body	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	react	`^19.2.8`	indirect
npm	react-dom	`^19.2.8`	indirect
npm	react-hotkeys-hook	`^5.3.3`	indirect
npm	react-router	`8.2.0`	indirect
npm	remark-cli	`^12.0.1`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	semantic-release	`^21.1.2`	indirect
npm	send	`0.19.0`	indirect
npm	serve-static	`1.16.2`	indirect
npm	setprototypeof	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-list	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-weakmap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	statuses	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	stylelint	`^17.14.1`	indirect
npm	toidentifier	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	tsdown	`^0.22.14`	indirect
npm	tsx	`^4.21.0`	indirect
npm	tsx	`^4.23.0`	indirect
npm	type-is	`1.6.18`	indirect
npm	typescript	`^5.9.3`	indirect
npm	typescript	`^6.0.3`	indirect
npm	unpipe	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	utils-merge	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	vary	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.1.4`	indirect
npm	vite	`^7.2.7`	indirect
npm	vitest	`^4.1.10`	indirect
npm	ws	`^8.21.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@lobehub/editor@4.27.3 pulls in 345 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records