Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 05:51 UTC

lovasoa / whitebophir

Online collaborative Whiteboard that is simple, free, easy to use and to deploy

JavaScriptAGPL-3.0★ 2,643 stars⑂ 485 forkssince Aug 2013View on GitHub ↗

#collaborative #javascript #whiteboard #teaching #education #draw #art

lovasoa/whitebophir holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Security (51/100). It was last updated 35 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ophir LOJKINEPersonal account

649 followers363 public repossince Jan 2011@datadog

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	whitebophir	1.0.22	54	1	2800 days ago	collaborative whiteboard

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

56Moderate

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 35 days ago
10.4/36	Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 1,044 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1,044
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	35
active_weeks_last_year	15

Release discipline

88Excellent

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 35 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~5.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v2.17.0
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	35
mean_days_between_releases	5.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

87Excellent

How it's scored

55.5/60	Stars — 2,643 stars
22.4/25	Forks — 485 forks
8.7/15	Watchers — 38 watchers

Inputs used

forks	485
stars	2,643
watchers	38
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

57Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	1
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

29At Risk

How it's scored

23.2/80	Monthly downloads — 54 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	whitebophir
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	54
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

34At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 37 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	37
top_contributor_share	0.926

Issue & PR responsiveness

54Moderate

How it's scored

24.7/42	Issue resolution — 59% of issues closed
22.5/30	PR acceptance — 122/163 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	122
open_issues	94
closed_issues	134
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.588
closed_unmerged_prs	41
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

69Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
20.2/25	Owner reach — 649 followers of lovasoa
25/25	Track record — 363 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	649
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	lovasoa
public_repos	363
account_age_days	5,724

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

53Moderate

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
4/35	Publish recency — latest publish 2,800 days ago
4/20	Version history — 1 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	whitebophir
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	2,800

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — biome.json
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://wbo.ophir.dev
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	collaborative, javascript, whiteboard, teaching, education, draw, art
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://wbo.ophir.dev
docs_site	https://wbo.ophir.dev
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	5.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

35Weak

How it's scored

14/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: node-static 0.7.11 (high 7.5)
3/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 7 affected: minimist 0.0.10 (critical 9.8), uglify-js 1.3.5 (critical 9.8), timespan 2.3.0 (high 7.5), +4 more
17.7/40	No advisories left outstanding — 8 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 3,242 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	15
affected_packages	8
assessed_packages	84
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 2, high 2, moderate 2, low 2
direct_affected_packages	1

Matched the npm:whitebophir@1.0.22 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 84 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

54Moderate

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.1/40	Legible commit history — 17 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.17
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	28,766

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

57Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — biome.json
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (tsconfig.json)
54.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/204 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	86,379
source_files_sampled	204
oversized_source_files	2

Key facts

2,643GitHub stars

37contributors

1,044commits, last 12 months

35days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

94open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 485 ⇿

0Stars

485Forks

100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 45Patch 54

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10

5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 05:50 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
3	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 15

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@opentelemetry/api	`^1.9.1`	package.json
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-logs-otlp-http	`^0.221.0`	package.json
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-http	`^0.221.0`	package.json
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http	`^0.221.0`	package.json
npm	@opentelemetry/instrumentation-runtime-node	`^0.34.0`	package.json
npm	@opentelemetry/resources	`^2.8.0`	package.json
npm	@opentelemetry/sdk-logs	`^0.221.0`	package.json
npm	@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics	`^2.8.0`	package.json
npm	@opentelemetry/sdk-node	`^0.221.0`	package.json
npm	@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base	`^2.8.0`	package.json
npm	@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions	`^1.40.0`	package.json
npm	handlebars	`^4.7.7`	package.json
npm	jsonwebtoken	`^9.0.0`	package.json
npm	serve-static	`^2.2.0`	package.json
npm	socket.io	`^4`	package.json

All dependencies 146

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 128 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@opentelemetry/api	`1.9.1`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-logs-otlp-http	`0.219.0`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-http	`0.219.0`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http	`0.219.0`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/instrumentation-runtime-node	`0.32.0`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/resources	`2.8.0`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/resources	`2.9.0`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/sdk-logs	`0.219.0`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics	`2.8.0`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics	`2.9.0`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/sdk-node	`0.219.0`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base	`2.8.0`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base	`2.9.0`	direct
npm	@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions	`1.41.1`	direct
npm	handlebars	`4.7.9`	direct
npm	jsonwebtoken	`9.0.3`	direct
npm	serve-static	`2.2.1`	direct
npm	socket.io	`4.8.3`	direct
npm	@biomejs/biome	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm64	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-darwin-x64	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-x64	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-win32-arm64	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-win32-x64	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	@grpc/grpc-js	`1.14.4`	indirect
npm	@grpc/proto-loader	`0.8.1`	indirect
npm	@js-sdsl/ordered-map	`4.4.2`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/api-logs	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/configuration	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/context-async-hooks	`2.8.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/core	`2.8.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/core	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-logs-otlp-grpc	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-logs-otlp-proto	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-grpc	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-metrics-otlp-proto	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-prometheus	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-proto	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/exporter-zipkin	`2.8.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/instrumentation	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/otlp-exporter-base	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/otlp-grpc-exporter-base	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/otlp-transformer	`0.219.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/propagator-b3	`2.8.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/propagator-jaeger	`2.8.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/sdk-trace	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-node	`2.8.0`	indirect
npm	@playwright/test	`1.61.1`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/aspromise	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/base64	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/codegen	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/eventemitter	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/fetch	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/float	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/path	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/pool	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/utf8	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	@socket.io/component-emitter	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@types/cors	`2.8.19`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.1.0`	indirect
npm	@types/ws	`8.18.1`	indirect
npm	accepts	`1.3.8`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	base64id	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	buffer-equal-constant-time	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	cjs-module-lexer	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	cookie	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	cors	`2.8.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	depd	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ecdsa-sig-formatter	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	ee-first	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	engine.io	`6.6.9`	indirect
npm	engine.io-parser	`5.2.3`	indirect
npm	es-module-lexer	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-html	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	etag	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	fresh	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	import-in-the-middle	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	jwa	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	jws	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	lodash.camelcase	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.includes	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.isboolean	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	lodash.isinteger	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	lodash.isnumber	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	lodash.isplainobject	`4.0.6`	indirect
npm	lodash.isstring	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	lodash.once	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	long	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.54.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	module-details-from-path	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	negotiator	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	neo-async	`2.6.2`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	on-finished	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	parseurl	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	playwright	`1.61.1`	indirect
npm	playwright-core	`1.61.1`	indirect
npm	protobufjs	`7.6.5`	indirect
npm	range-parser	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	require-in-the-middle	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	indirect
npm	send	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	setprototypeof	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	socket.io-adapter	`2.5.8`	indirect
npm	socket.io-parser	`4.2.6`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	statuses	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	toidentifier	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	uglify-js	`3.19.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	vary	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	wordwrap	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.21.0`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.3`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 8

Installing npm:whitebophir@1.0.22 pulls in 84 packages, direct and transitive: 8 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
minimist	`0.0.10`	indirect	critical	2	`1.2.6`
uglify-js	`1.3.5`	indirect	critical	2	`2.7.2`
node-static	`0.7.11`	direct	high	2	—
timespan	`2.3.0`	indirect	high	1	—
js-yaml	`0.3.7`	indirect	moderate	5	`4.2.0`
parseuri	`0.0.6`	indirect	moderate	1	—
cookie	`0.4.2`	indirect	low	1	`0.7.0`
debug	`4.1.1`	indirect	low	1	`4.3.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records