Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-05 07:21 UTC

lsnepomuceno / laravel-a1-pdf-sign

Sign PDF files with valid x509 certificate

PHPMIT★ 317 stars⑂ 63 forkssince Jun 2021View on GitHub ↗

lsnepomuceno/laravel-a1-pdf-sign holds a health index of 32 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (65/100) and lowest on Vitality (33/100). It was last updated 92 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

32
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

32
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Lucas NepomucenoPersonal account
51 followers24 public repossince Sep 2015@Nepo-Solucoes

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistlsnepomuceno/laravel-a1-pdf-sign1.4.12,84341489 days agox509laravelcertificatesigna1sign-pdficp-brasil

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

33At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recencylast push 92 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.73
days_since_last_push92
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases36 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 489 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~42.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count36
latest_release_tag1.4.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release489
mean_days_between_releases42.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.5/60Stars317 stars
14.9/25Forks63 forks
5/15Watchers9 watchers
Inputs used
forks63
stars317
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
46.1/80Monthly downloads2,843 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageslsnepomuceno/laravel-a1-pdf-sign
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads115,595
monthly_downloads2,843
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 96% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth7 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.965
How it's scored
38.8/42Issue resolution92% of issues closed
18.2/30PR acceptance86/142 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs86
open_issues3
closed_issues36
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.923
closed_unmerged_prs56
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
12.3/25Owner reach51 followers of lsnepomuceno
22.2/25Track record24 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers51
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginlsnepomuceno
public_repos24
account_age_days3,989
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
14/35Publish recencylatest publish 489 days ago
20/20Version history41 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslsnepomuceno/laravel-a1-pdf-sign
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish489

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

59Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://laravel-a1-pdf-sign.netlify.app/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics18 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaravel-framework, lumen, php, sign, sign-pdf, back-end, laravel, openssl, icp, icp-brasil, pdf-signature, pdf-sign, document-signature, document-sign, certificate, x509, x509certificates, x509sign
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://laravel-a1-pdf-sign.netlify.app/
docs_sitehttps://laravel-a1-pdf-sign.netlify.app/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14.5/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: setasign/fpdi 2.6.3 (moderate 6.5), symfony/process 6.4.19 (moderate 6.3)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
30.3/40No advisories left outstanding2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 364 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories21
affected_packages12
assessed_packages118
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 4, moderate 8
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 118 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history67 of 73 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.918
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance27 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.27
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/28 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes7,664
source_files_sampled28
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

317GitHub stars
7contributors
0commits, last 12 months
92days since last push
36releases
1bus factor
3open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 63 ⇿
0Stars
63Forks
32Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756322021-072023-122026-06
Major 0Minor 4Patch 27

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-05 07:20 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/support^9 || ^10 || ^11 || ^12composer.json
Packagistilluminate/encryption^9 || ^10 || ^11 || ^12composer.json
Packagistilluminate/http^9 || ^10 || ^11 || ^12composer.json
Packagisttecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf^8composer.json
Packagisttecnickcom/tcpdf^6composer.json
Packagistsetasign/fpdi^2.6composer.json
Packagistsymfony/process^6 || ^7composer.json
Packagistintervention/image^3.11composer.json
All dependencies 118

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 113 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistintervention/image3.11.2direct
Packagistsetasign/fpdi2.6.3direct
Packagistsymfony/process6.4.19direct
Packagisttecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf8.0.85direct
Packagisttecnickcom/tcpdf6.9.0direct
Packagistbrick/math0.12.3indirect
Packagistcarbonphp/carbon-doctrine-types2.1.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.3indirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-data3.0.3indirect
Packagistdoctrine/inflector2.0.10indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression3.4.0indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator4.0.4indirect
Packagistfakerphp/faker1.24.1indirect
Packagistfilp/whoops2.18.0indirect
Packagistfruitcake/php-cors1.3.0indirect
Packagistgraham-campbell/result-type1.1.3indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/uri-template1.0.4indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php2.0.1indirect
Packagistintervention/gif4.2.1indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework10.48.29indirect
Packagistlaravel/prompts0.1.25indirect
Packagistlaravel/serializable-closure1.3.7indirect
Packagistlaravel/tinker2.10.1indirect
Packagistleague/commonmark2.6.1indirect
Packagistleague/config1.2.0indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem3.29.1indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem-local3.29.0indirect
Packagistleague/mime-type-detection1.16.0indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery1.6.12indirect
Packagistmonolog/monolog3.8.1indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.0indirect
Packagistnesbot/carbon2.73.0indirect
Packagistnette/schema1.3.2indirect
Packagistnette/utils4.0.5indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.4.0indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision7.12.0indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/termwind1.17.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas8.12.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/canvas-core8.10.2indirect
Packagistorchestra/sidekick1.1.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench8.34.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core8.35.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/workbench8.17.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpoption/phpoption1.9.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage10.1.16indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator4.1.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker4.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template3.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit10.5.45indirect
Packagistpsr/clock1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsy/psysh0.12.8indirect
Packagistramsey/collection2.1.1indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid4.7.6indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser2.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit2.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator5.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity3.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff5.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment6.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter5.1.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state6.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/type4.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version4.0.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/console6.4.17indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector6.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handler6.4.19indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher6.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder6.4.17indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation6.4.18indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel6.4.19indirect
Packagistsymfony/mailer6.4.18indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime6.4.19indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php831.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-uuid1.31.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing6.4.18indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string6.4.15indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation6.4.19indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts3.5.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/uid6.4.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper6.4.18indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml6.4.18indirect
Packagisttecnickcom/tc-lib-barcode2.4.3indirect
Packagisttecnickcom/tc-lib-color2.2.8indirect
Packagisttecnickcom/tc-lib-file2.1.3indirect
Packagisttecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-encrypt2.1.11indirect
Packagisttecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-font2.6.6indirect
Packagisttecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-graph2.2.7indirect
Packagisttecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-image2.1.7indirect
Packagisttecnickcom/tc-lib-pdf-page4.2.6indirect
Packagisttecnickcom/tc-lib-unicode2.0.19indirect
Packagisttecnickcom/tc-lib-unicode-data2.0.19indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.3indirect
Packagisttijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles2.3.0indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv5.6.1indirect
Packagistvoku/portable-ascii2.0.3indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.11.0indirect
Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 118 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
laravel/framework10.48.29indirecthigh213.12.0
phpunit/phpunit10.5.45indirecthigh112.5.8
symfony/http-foundation6.4.18indirecthigh28.0.13
symfony/mailer6.4.18indirecthigh18.0.12
setasign/fpdi2.6.3directmoderate22.6.7
symfony/process6.4.19directmoderate18.0.5
league/commonmark2.6.1indirectmoderate32.8.2
psy/psysh0.12.8indirectmoderate10.12.19
symfony/mime6.4.19indirectmoderate28.0.12
symfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.31.0indirectmoderate11.38.1
symfony/routing6.4.18indirectmoderate28.0.13
symfony/yaml6.4.18indirectmoderate38.0.12

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.