Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-11 20:42 UTC

manwithacat / dazzle

A semantic substrate for AI-collaborative software.

Python · HTMLMIT★ 4 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Nov 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#ai-agent#saas-platform#fastapi#htmx#hypermedia#pydantic#starlette

manwithacat/dazzle holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (49/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

James BarlowPersonal account
11 followers14 public repossince Jul 2010

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmdazzlepoints to another repo — not scored1.0.4115134944 days agosteamdazzledotadota2api
PyPIdazzle-dsl0.115.02,1211,0580 days agodslsaascompliancesoc2iso27001rbacgraphopenapillmdomain-modelingapplication-framework

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

95Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
31.2/36Commit cadence — 45/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 8,473 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year8,473
human_commit_share0.88
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year45

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 95 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~9.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count95
latest_release_tagv0.115.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases9.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars4
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate
How it's scored
44.4/80Monthly downloads — 2,121 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdazzle-dsl
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,121
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

21At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 74% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.737

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good
How it's scored
41.7/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
25.2/30PR acceptance — 161/192 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs161
open_issues10
closed_issues1,568
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d29
prs_decided_30d30
issue_closed_ratio0.994
closed_unmerged_prs31
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

48Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
7.8/25Owner reach — 11 followers of manwithacat
20.6/25Track record — 14 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers11
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmanwithacat
public_repos14
account_age_days5,933
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 1,058 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdazzle-dsl
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 18 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://manwithacat.github.io/dazzle/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agent, saas-platform, fastapi, htmx, hypermedia, pydantic, starlette
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://manwithacat.github.io/dazzle/
docs_sitehttps://manwithacat.github.io/dazzle/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

59Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.9

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages304
unassessed_packages8
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 304 resolved dependencies against OSV. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .claude/CLAUDE.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, examples/simple_task/.claude/CLAUDE.md, examples/simple_task/.clinerules, examples/support_tickets/.claude/CLAUDE.md, examples/support_tickets/.clinerules, packages/hatchi-maxchi/AGENTS.md, src/dazzle/examples/simple_task/.claude/CLAUDE.md, src/dazzle/examples/simple_task/.clinerules, src/dazzle/templates/blank/.claude/CLAUDE.md, src/dazzle/templates/blank/.clinerules, src/dazzle/templates/blank/AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 88 of 88 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.claude/CLAUDE.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, examples/simple_task/.claude/CLAUDE.md, examples/simple_task/.clinerules, examples/support_tickets/.claude/CLAUDE.md, examples/support_tickets/.clinerules, packages/hatchi-maxchi/AGENTS.md, src/dazzle/examples/simple_task/.claude/CLAUDE.md, src/dazzle/examples/simple_task/.clinerules, src/dazzle/templates/blank/.claude/CLAUDE.md, src/dazzle/templates/blank/.clinerules, src/dazzle/templates/blank/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes27,210

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

88Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/dazzle/templates/blank/pyrightconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 11 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/dazzle/templates/blank/pyrightconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.11

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/dazzle/templates/blank/pyrightconfig.json)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 34/3,918 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes347,883
source_files_sampled3,918
oversized_source_files34

Machine-readable interfaces

60Moderate
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples, recipes
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, recipes
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

4GitHub stars
2contributors
8,473commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
95releases
1bus factor
10open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • npm package 'dazzle' points at a different repository (https://github.com/JamieLottering/dazzle-node); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212026-072026-082026-10
Major 0Minor 12Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-11 20:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpydantic>=2.0pyproject.toml
PyPItyper>=0.9pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0pyproject.toml
PyPImarkdown>=3.5pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.24.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg>=3.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg-pool>=3.2pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy>=2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIalembic>=1.14pyproject.toml
PyPIslowapi>=0.1.9pyproject.toml
PyPIfaker>=20.0pyproject.toml
PyPIsegno>=1.5pyproject.toml
PyPIbleach>=6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIitsdangerous>=2.1pyproject.toml
PyPIPyJWT>=2.8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.100.0pyproject.toml
PyPItomli_w>=1.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 312

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 293 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIalembic1.18.4direct
PyPIbleach6.4.0direct
PyPIfaker40.21.0direct
PyPIfastapi—direct
PyPIfastapi0.142.2direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIitsdangerous2.2.0direct
PyPImarkdown3.10.2direct
PyPIpsycopg3.3.4direct
PyPIpsycopg-pool3.3.1direct
PyPIpydantic—direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpyjwt2.15.1direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIsegno1.6.6direct
PyPIslowapi0.1.9direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.50direct
PyPItomli-w1.2.0direct
PyPItyper0.26.7direct
npm@cacheable/memory2.2.0indirect
npm@cacheable/utils2.5.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.5indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.7.0indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.1indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.3indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@keyv/bigmap1.3.1indirect
npm@keyv/serialize1.1.1indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.14.0indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.12indirect
npmcacheable2.5.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.11.0indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfile-entry-cache11.1.5indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache6.1.23indirect
npmflatted3.4.4indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmhashery1.5.1indirect
npmhookified1.15.1indirect
npmhookified2.2.0indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv5.6.0indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmminimatch10.2.6indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqified0.10.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
PyPIaio-pika9.6.2indirect
PyPIaioboto315.5.0indirect
PyPIaiobotocore2.25.1indirect
PyPIaiofiles25.1.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.2indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3indirect
PyPIaioitertools0.13.0indirect
PyPIaiokafka0.14.0indirect
PyPIaiormq6.9.4indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIaiosqlite0.22.1indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanthropic1.9.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIasgiref3.11.1indirect
PyPIasn1crypto1.5.1indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.11.2indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIauthlib1.7.2indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIboto31.40.61indirect
PyPIbotocore1.40.61indirect
PyPIbrotli1.2.0indirect
PyPIbrotlicffi1.2.0.1indirect
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.4indirect
PyPIcattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.5.20indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.1indirect
PyPIcross-web0.7.0indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIcssselect20.9.0indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdazzle-dsl0.115.0indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.18.0indirect
PyPIexecnet2.1.2indirect
PyPIfirebase-admin7.4.0indirect
PyPIfonttools4.63.0indirect
PyPIfpdf22.8.7indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-core2.31.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.59.1indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-core2.6.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-firestore2.27.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-storage3.11.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-crc32c1.8.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-genai2.28.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-resumable-media2.10.0indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.75.0indirect
PyPIgraphql-core3.3.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.1indirect
PyPIgrimp3.14indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.81.0indirect
PyPIgrpcio-status1.81.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh24.4.1indirect
PyPIhpack4.2.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.13.0indirect
PyPIhttptools0.8.0indirect
PyPIhttpx22.13.0indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.1.0indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.168.3indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimport-linter2.11indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIisodate0.7.2indirect
PyPIjiter0.15.0indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjoserfc1.7.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.0indirect
PyPIlibcst1.9.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.16.0indirect
PyPIlimits5.8.0indirect
PyPIlinkify-it-py2.1.0indirect
PyPIlsprotocol2025.0.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.1indirect
PyPImako1.4.3indirect
PyPImando0.7.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.10.9indirect
PyPImcp2.0.0indirect
PyPImcp-types2.0.0indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImkdocs—indirect
PyPImkdocs-material—indirect
PyPImoto5.2.2indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.1indirect
PyPImultidict6.9.1indirect
PyPImutmut3.8.0indirect
PyPImypy2.4.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInexus-rpc1.4.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.6indirect
PyPIopenai2.41.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-asgi0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-asyncio0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-dbapi0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-fastapi0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-psycopg0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-proto1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-util-http0.65b0indirect
PyPIoscrypto1.3.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpamqp3.3.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIplaywright1.60.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIproto-plus1.28.0indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.6indirect
PyPIpsycopg-binary3.3.4indirect
PyPIpy-partiql-parser0.6.3indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydyf0.12.1indirect
PyPIpyee13.0.1indirect
PyPIpygls2.1.1indirect
PyPIpygments—indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyhanko0.35.1indirect
PyPIpyhanko-certvalidator0.31.1indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions—indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyphen0.17.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.8.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpython-http-client3.3.7indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpython-pptx1.0.2indirect
PyPIpython3-saml1.16.0indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpyyaml-ft8.0.0indirect
PyPIradon6.0.1indirect
PyPIredis8.0.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIresponses0.26.1indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.5.1indirect
PyPIruff0.16.10indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.14.0indirect
PyPIsendgrid6.12.5indirect
PyPIsetproctitle1.3.7indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.4indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPIstrawberry-graphql0.329.0indirect
PyPIsyrupy6.1.1indirect
PyPItemporalio1.28.0indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.4indirect
PyPItextual8.2.7indirect
PyPItigerbeetle0.17.6indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItinyhtml52.1.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.68.1indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPItypes-protobuf6.32.1.20260221indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260906indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPItzlocal5.3.1indirect
PyPIuc-micro-py2.0.0indirect
PyPIuritools6.1.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn—indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.49.0indirect
PyPIuvloop0.22.1indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIweasyprint70.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.0indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.9indirect
PyPIwrapt1.17.3indirect
PyPIxlsxwriter3.2.9indirect
PyPIxmlsec1.3.17indirect
PyPIxmltodict1.0.4indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.2indirect
PyPIz3-solver5.1.0.0indirect
PyPIzopfli0.4.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 304 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 8 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with manwithacat/dazzle. Read them side by side →

98intuitem/ciso-assistant-communityCISO Assistant is a one-stop-shop GRC platform for Risk Management, AppSec, Compliance & Audit, TPRM, BIA, Privacy, and Reporting. It supports 200+ global frameworks with automatic control mapping, including ISO 27001, NIST CSF, SOC 2, CIS, PCI DSS, NIS2, DORA, GDPR, HIPAA, CMMC, and more.Exceptional96fastapi/fastapiFastAPI framework, high performance, easy to learn, fast to code, ready for productionExceptional96Canner/WrenAIGenBI (Generative BI) for AI agents, an open-source, governed text-to-SQL through an open context layer that turns natural-language questions into trusted dashboards, charts, and SQL across 20+ data sources, such as BigQuery, Snowflake, PostgreSQL, ClickHouse, Amazon Redshift, Databricks and more.Exceptional95koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generatorGenerate Pydantic v2 models, dataclasses, TypedDict, and msgspec.Struct from OpenAPI, JSON Schema, GraphQL, Avro, Protobuf, and raw JSON/YAML/CSV.Exceptional99pydantic/logfireAI observability platform for production LLM and agent systems.Exceptional98Agenta-AI/agentaAgenta is a workspace where you and your team build agents and automations.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, PyPI.