Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 02:42 UTC

mapequation / infomap

Multi-level network clustering based on the Map Equation

C++ · PythonGPL-3.0★ 493 stars⑂ 93 forkssince Jun 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#network-analysis#clustering-algorithm#infomap#map-equation#information-theory

mapequation/infomap holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (94/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (70/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

mapequationOrganization · verified domain
31 followers49 public repossince Nov 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@mapequation/infomap2.15.13166136 days agomap-equationnetwork-analysiscommunity-detectionclustering-algorithm
PyPIinfomap2.15.117,6428936 days agomap-equationnetwork-analysiscommunity-detectionclustering-algorithm

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 649 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year649
human_commit_share0.64
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year28

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 32 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 36 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~17.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count32
latest_release_tagv2.15.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release36
mean_days_between_releases17.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

66Good
How it's scored
43.7/60Stars — 493 stars
16.4/25Forks — 93 forks
6.4/15Watchers — 15 watchers
Inputs used
forks93
stars493
watchers15
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

71Good
How it's scored
56.7/80Monthly downloads — 17,958 downloads/month across npm, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@mapequation/infomap, infomap
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads17,958
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

35Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 64% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.645

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good
How it's scored
36.2/42Issue resolution — 86% of issues closed
25.6/30PR acceptance — 584/685 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs584
open_issues48
closed_issues301
prs_merged_7d15
prs_decided_7d16
prs_merged_30d42
prs_decided_30d43
issue_closed_ratio0.862
closed_unmerged_prs101
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
10.8/25Owner reach — 31 followers of mapequation
24.4/25Track record — 49 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers31
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmapequation
public_repos49
account_age_days3,941

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 36 days ago
20/20Version history — 89 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@mapequation/infomap, infomap
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish36

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 15 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://mapequation.org/infomap?utm_source=github&utm_medium=repository&utm_campaign=infomap
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsnetwork-analysis, clustering-algorithm, infomap, map-equation, information-theory
has_wikino
homepagehttps://mapequation.org/infomap?utm_source=github&utm_medium=repository&utm_campaign=infomap
docs_sitehttps://mapequation.org/infomap?utm_source=github&utm_medium=repository&utm_campaign=infomap
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

67Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0.5/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: InProgress
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.7

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages227
unassessed_packages2
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 227 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

94Exceptional · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://mapequation.org/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 64 of 64 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://mapequation.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes13,261

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

86Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, examples/cpp/Infomap-igraph-interface-library/Makefile, examples/cpp/igraph/Makefile, examples/cpp/minimal/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — interfaces/js/test/package/tsconfig.json, interfaces/js/tsconfig.json, interfaces/python/src/infomap/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 35 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, examples/cpp/Infomap-igraph-interface-library/Makefile, examples/cpp/igraph/Makefile, examples/cpp/minimal/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsinterfaces/js/test/package/tsconfig.json, interfaces/js/tsconfig.json, interfaces/python/src/infomap/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.35

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed)
53.9/55Manageable file sizes — 6/295 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes163,657
source_files_sampled295
oversized_source_files6

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

493GitHub stars
6contributors
649commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
32releases
1bus factor
48open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 93 ⇿
0Stars
93Forks
32Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801009232016-092021-082026-08
Major 1Minor 17Patch 14

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 02:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
2CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
0Code-ReviewFound 0/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 229

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 229 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@asamuzakjp/css-color6.0.5indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/dom-selector8.3.0indirect
npm@biomejs/biome2.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-x642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl2.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl2.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-arm642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-x642.5.11indirect
npm@bramus/specificity2.4.2indirect
npm@csstools/color-helpers6.1.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-calc3.3.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-color-parser4.1.10indirect
npm@csstools/css-parser-algorithms4.0.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-syntax-patches-for-csstree1.1.7indirect
npm@csstools/css-tokenizer4.0.0indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@exodus/bytes1.15.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-x64-gnu1.5.1indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.144.0indirect
npm@playwright/test1.62.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.4indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-commonjs29.0.3indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-json6.1.0indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-node-resolve16.0.3indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.3.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.63.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.63.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node26.4.1indirect
npm@types/react19.2.18indirect
npm@types/react-dom19.2.5indirect
npm@types/resolve1.20.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.11indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmbidi-js1.0.3indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmcommondir1.0.1indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcss-tree3.2.1indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdata-urls7.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdecimal.js10.6.0indirect
npmdeepmerge4.3.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmentities8.0.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer1.7.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.1.0indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-tsconfig4.14.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmhtml-encoding-sniffer6.0.0indirect
npmis-core-module2.16.1indirect
npmis-module1.0.0indirect
npmis-potential-custom-element-name1.0.1indirect
npmis-reference1.2.1indirect
npmjsdom30.0.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.2indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmdn-data2.27.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmobug2.1.1indirect
npmparse58.0.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmplaywright1.62.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.62.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.26indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmreact19.2.8indirect
npmreact-dom19.2.8indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmresolve1.22.11indirect
npmresolve-pkg-maps1.0.0indirect
npmrolldown1.2.4indirect
npmrollup4.63.1indirect
npmrollup-plugin-esbuild6.2.1indirect
npmsaxes6.0.0indirect
npmscheduler0.27.0indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.1.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmsymbol-tree3.2.4indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.1.2indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.1indirect
npmtldts7.4.10indirect
npmtldts-core7.4.10indirect
npmtough-cookie6.0.2indirect
npmtr466.0.0indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmundici8.9.0indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmunplugin-utils0.2.5indirect
npmvite8.2.1indirect
npmvitest4.1.11indirect
npmw3c-xmlserializer5.0.0indirect
npmwebidl-conversions8.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-mimetype5.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-url16.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-url17.1.0indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmxml-name-validator5.0.0indirect
npmxmlchars2.2.0indirect
PyPIcibuildwheel4.2.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema—indirect
PyPIpyright1.1.411indirect
PyPIruff0.16.5indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 227 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with mapequation/infomap. Read them side by side →

59code-shoily/yog_exAn Elixir library for Graph Algorithms and Network AnalysisModerate75colliery-io/graphqlite A SQLite extension that adds graph database capabilities with Cypher query language support and built-in graph algorithms.Good73benchmark-urbanism/cityseer-apiComputational tools for urban analysisGood69Furox-Art/scientific-computing-system-2.0Scientific computing platform on NumPy/SciPy/pandas/matplotlib: linear algebra, stats, optimization, signals, ML, information theory, chaos, Bayes, metaheuristics, geometry and RL.Good96graphframes/graphframesGraphFrames is a package for Apache Spark which provides DataFrame-based GraphsExceptional95secdev/scapyScapy: the Python-based interactive packet manipulation program & library.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, PyPI.