Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 21:27 UTC

marella / material-symbols

Latest variable icon fonts and optimized SVGs for Material Symbols.

CSS · SCSSApache-2.0★ 285 stars⑂ 45 forkssince May 2022View on GitHub ↗

marella/material-symbols holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (68/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (9/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Ravindra MarellaPersonal account
138 followers49 public repossince Apr 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence42/52 weeks with commits, discounted for automation: 1 of the last 100 commits human-authored, spanning 160 days
0.4/18Commit volume121 commits in the last year, discounted for automation: 1 of the last 100 commits human-authored, spanning 160 days
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year121
human_commit_share0.01
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year42

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.47.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
39.8/60Stars285 stars
13.7/25Forks45 forks
2.7/15Watchers4 watchers
Inputs used
forks45
stars285
watchers4
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads2,251,964 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@material-symbols/metadata, material-symbols
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads2,251,964
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 94% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.941
How it's scored
21.5/42Issue resolution51% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance3/3 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs3
open_issues23
closed_issues24
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.511
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
15.4/25Owner reach138 followers of marella
24.4/25Track record49 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers138
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginmarella
public_repos49
account_age_days5,254
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history150 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@material-symbols/metadata, material-symbols
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://marella.github.io/material-symbols/demo/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfont, icons, material, material-design, material-design-icons, material-icons, symbols, material-symbols, svg
has_wikino
homepagehttps://marella.github.io/material-symbols/demo/
docs_sitehttps://marella.github.io/material-symbols/demo/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities19 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories19
affected_packages8
assessed_packages173
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 5, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 173 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

9Critical · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeCSS without a type-check config
11/55Manageable file sizes8/10 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageCSS
largest_source_bytes71,589
source_files_sampled10
oversized_source_files8

Key facts

285GitHub stars
2contributors
121commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
23open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-17: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 285 stars today.
  • File tree truncated by GitHub API; file-based signals may be incomplete
  • deps.dev does not index npm:material-symbols@0.47.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 279 ★ / 45 ⇿
279Stars
45Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-17. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

0501001502002503002794542022-052024-062026-08
Major 0Minor 26Patch 73

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 21:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities19 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 173

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 173 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@material-design-icons/scripts0.5.2indirect
npm@material-symbols/font-1000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/font-2000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/font-3000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/font-4000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/font-5000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/font-6000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/font-7000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/metadata0.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/svg-1000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/svg-2000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/svg-3000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/svg-4000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/svg-5000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/svg-6000.28.1indirect
npm@material-symbols/svg-7000.28.1indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@sindresorhus/is4.6.0indirect
npm@swc/helpers0.3.17indirect
npm@szmarczak/http-timer4.0.6indirect
npm@trysound/sax0.2.0indirect
npm@types/cacheable-request6.0.3indirect
npm@types/http-cache-semantics4.0.1indirect
npm@types/keyv3.1.4indirect
npm@types/node18.11.9indirect
npm@types/responselike1.0.0indirect
npmaggregate-error3.1.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.2indirect
npmarray-union2.1.0indirect
npmavailable-typed-arrays1.0.5indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.2.0indirect
npmboolbase1.0.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbraces3.0.2indirect
npmbrotli1.3.3indirect
npmcacheable-lookup5.0.4indirect
npmcacheable-request7.0.2indirect
npmcall-bind1.0.2indirect
npmchokidar3.5.3indirect
npmclean-stack2.2.0indirect
npmclone2.1.2indirect
npmclone-response1.0.3indirect
npmcommander7.2.0indirect
npmcommander8.3.0indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcss-select4.3.0indirect
npmcss-tree1.1.3indirect
npmcss-what6.1.0indirect
npmcsso4.2.0indirect
npmdecompress-response6.0.0indirect
npmdeep-equal2.1.0indirect
npmdefer-to-connect2.0.1indirect
npmdefine-properties1.1.4indirect
npmdel6.1.1indirect
npmdfa1.2.0indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmdom-serializer1.4.1indirect
npmdomelementtype2.3.0indirect
npmdomhandler4.3.1indirect
npmdomutils2.8.0indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.4indirect
npmentities2.2.0indirect
npmes-get-iterator1.1.2indirect
npmfast-glob3.2.12indirect
npmfast-xml-parser3.21.1indirect
npmfastq1.13.0indirect
npmfill-range7.0.1indirect
npmfontkit1.9.0indirect
npmfor-each0.3.3indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.1indirect
npmfunctions-have-names1.2.3indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.1.3indirect
npmget-stream5.2.0indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglobby11.1.0indirect
npmgopd1.0.1indirect
npmgot11.8.5indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.10indirect
npmhas1.0.3indirect
npmhas-bigints1.0.2indirect
npmhas-property-descriptors1.0.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.0.3indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.0indirect
npmhttp-cache-semantics4.1.1indirect
npmhttp2-wrapper1.0.3indirect
npmignore5.2.0indirect
npmimmutable4.1.0indirect
npmindent-string4.0.0indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-arguments1.1.1indirect
npmis-bigint1.0.4indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-boolean-object1.1.2indirect
npmis-callable1.2.7indirect
npmis-date-object1.0.5indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-map2.0.2indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-number-object1.0.7indirect
npmis-path-cwd2.2.0indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmis-regex1.1.4indirect
npmis-set2.0.2indirect
npmis-string1.0.7indirect
npmis-svg4.3.2indirect
npmis-symbol1.0.4indirect
npmis-typed-array1.1.10indirect
npmis-weakmap2.0.1indirect
npmis-weakset2.0.2indirect
npmisarray2.0.5indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.2indirect
npmlowercase-keys2.0.0indirect
npmmaterial-symbols0.28.1indirect
npmmdn-data2.0.14indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.5indirect
npmmimic-response1.0.1indirect
npmmimic-response3.1.0indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmnormalize-url6.1.0indirect
npmnth-check2.1.1indirect
npmobject-inspect1.12.2indirect
npmobject-is1.1.5indirect
npmobject-keys1.1.1indirect
npmobject.assign4.1.4indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmp-cancelable2.1.1indirect
npmp-map4.0.0indirect
npmpako0.2.9indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpump3.0.0indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmquick-lru5.1.1indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmregexp.prototype.flags1.4.3indirect
npmresolve-alpn1.2.1indirect
npmresponselike2.0.1indirect
npmrestructure2.0.1indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsass1.56.1indirect
npmside-channel1.0.4indirect
npmslash3.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.0.2indirect
npmstable0.1.8indirect
npmstrnum1.0.5indirect
npmsvgo2.8.0indirect
npmsvgo-add-viewbox1.1.0indirect
npmtiny-inflate1.0.3indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtslib2.4.1indirect
npmunicode-properties1.4.1indirect
npmunicode-trie2.0.0indirect
npmwhich-boxed-primitive1.0.2indirect
npmwhich-collection1.0.1indirect
npmwhich-typed-array1.1.9indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
Dependency advisories 8

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 173 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 8 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
immutable4.1.0indirectcritical35.1.8
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh55.0.9
braces3.0.2indirecthigh13.0.3
minimatch3.1.2indirecthigh310.2.3
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
svgo2.8.0indirecthigh24.0.2
fast-xml-parser3.21.1indirectmoderate25.7.0
micromatch4.0.5indirectmoderate14.0.8

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.