Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-30 22:52 UTC

maveniverse / maven-shared

Maveniverse Maven Shared

JavaEPL-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗

maveniverse/maven-shared holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (74/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 19 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MaveniverseOrganization
31 followers33 public repossince Nov 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Maveneu.maveniverse.maven.shared:core0.2.6-1923 days ago
Maveneu.maveniverse.maven.shared:plugin0.2.6-1923 days ago
Maveneu.maveniverse.maven.shared:extension0.2.6-1923 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 19 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence11/52 weeks with commits
14.4/18Commit volume39 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year39
human_commit_share0.877
days_since_last_push19
active_weeks_last_year11

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases19 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 23 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~30.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count19
latest_release_tagrelease-0.2.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release23
mean_days_between_releases30.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (EPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 97% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.972
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
11.2/30PR acceptance21/56 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs21
open_issues0
closed_issues4
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs35
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
10.8/25Owner reach31 followers of maveniverse
18.7/25Track record33 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers31
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmaveniverse
public_repos33
account_age_days1,383

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable3 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 23 days ago
20/20Version history19 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageseu.maveniverse.maven.shared:core, eu.maveniverse.maven.shared:plugin, eu.maveniverse.maven.shared:extension
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish23

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmaven
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the maven:eu.maveniverse.maven.shared:core@0.2.6 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9/40Legible commit history12 of 71 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.169
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapcore/pom.xml, extension/pom.xml, plugin/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingJava (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 81
8/8Automated maintenance10 of the last 81 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestscore/pom.xml, extension/pom.xml, plugin/pom.xml, pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.123
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeJava (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/14 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes19,701
source_files_sampled14
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
2contributors
39commits, last 12 months
19days since last push
19releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-30 22:52 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained7 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-apicore/pom.xml
Maveneu.maveniverse.maven.shared:core${project.version}extension/pom.xml
Maveneu.maveniverse.maven.shared:core${project.version}plugin/pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api${version.slf4j}pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-simple${version.slf4j}pom.xml
Mavenorg.slf4j:jcl-over-slf4j${version.slf4j}pom.xml
Mavenjavax.inject:javax.inject1pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-api${version.resolver}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-spi${version.resolver}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-util${version.resolver}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-impl${version.resolver}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-connector-basic${version.resolver}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api${version.maven}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-core${version.maven}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-model${version.maven}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-resolver-provider${version.maven}pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugin-tools:maven-plugin-annotations${version.maven-plugin-tools}pom.xml
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api6.1.3pom.xml
All dependencies 31

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 28 direct and 3 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Maveneu.maveniverse.maven.shared:core0.1.12-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenjavax.inject:javax.injectdirect
Mavenjavax.inject:javax.inject1direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugin-tools:maven-plugin-annotationsdirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-apidirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-api1.9.27direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-connector-basicdirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-connector-basic1.9.27direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-impl1.9.27direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-spidirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-spi1.9.27direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-utildirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-util1.9.27direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-coredirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-core3.9.16direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-modeldirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-model3.9.16direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-plugin-apidirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api3.9.16direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-resolver-providerdirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven:maven-resolver-provider3.9.16direct
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-apidirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api6.1.3direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:jcl-over-slf4j1.7.36direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-apidirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-api1.7.36direct
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-simpledirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-simple1.7.36direct
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.sisu:sisu-maven-pluginindirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing maven:eu.maveniverse.maven.shared:core@0.2.6 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsMaven.