Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 17:46 UTC

maykinmedia / open-inwoner-design-tokens

Single source of truth for the NL Design System design tokens in OIP

PythonCustom license★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2023View on GitHub ↗

maykinmedia/open-inwoner-design-tokens holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (69/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated 31 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MaykinOrganization
28 followers250 public repossince Apr 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@open-inwoner/design-tokens0.0.332,5634631 days agostyle-dictionarycommongroundnldesignsystemopen-inwoner

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 31 days ago
17.3/36Commit cadence25/52 weeks with commits
15.8/18Commit volume57 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year57
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push31
active_weeks_last_year25
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases31 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 31 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~24.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count31
latest_release_tag0.0.33
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release31
mean_days_between_releases24.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
45.5/80Monthly downloads2,563 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@open-inwoner/design-tokens
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads2,563
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 86% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.857
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
28.6/30PR acceptance42/44 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 9/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs42
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
10.5/25Owner reach28 followers of maykinmedia
25/25Track record250 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers28
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmaykinmedia
public_repos250
account_age_days5,631

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 31 days ago
20/20Version history46 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@open-inwoner/design-tokens
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish31

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 9/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
1.5/7.5Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories8
affected_packages3
assessed_packages164
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 164 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

33At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history81 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.81
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePython without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/1 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes2,629
source_files_sampled1
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
3contributors
57commits, last 12 months
31days since last push
31releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 17:45 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 9/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
1SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
2Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 164

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 164 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@bundled-es-modules/deepmerge4.3.1indirect
npm@bundled-es-modules/glob11.0.3indirect
npm@bundled-es-modules/memfs4.17.0indirect
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/base641.1.2indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/buffers1.2.1indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/codegen1.0.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/json-pack1.21.0indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/json-pointer1.0.2indirect
npm@jsonjoy.com/util1.9.0indirect
npm@zip.js/zip.js2.8.8indirect
npmansi-regex4.1.1indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmansi-styles3.2.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmassert2.1.0indirect
npmavailable-typed-arrays1.0.7indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.3.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.5indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbuffer6.0.3indirect
npmcall-bind1.0.8indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmcamelcase5.3.1indirect
npmchalk5.6.2indirect
npmchange-case5.4.4indirect
npmchokidar3.6.0indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmchokidar-cli3.0.0indirect
npmcliui5.0.0indirect
npmcolor-convert1.9.3indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.3indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcommander12.1.0indirect
npmcomponent-emitter2.0.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdecamelize1.2.0indirect
npmdeepmerge4.3.1indirect
npmdefine-data-property1.1.4indirect
npmdefine-properties1.2.1indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex7.0.3indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.1indirect
npmevents3.3.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up3.0.0indirect
npmfor-each0.3.5indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmgenerator-function2.0.1indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmglob11.1.0indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-to-regex.js1.2.0indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-property-descriptors1.0.2indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmhyperdyperid1.2.0indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npminherits2.0.3indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-arguments1.2.0indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-callable1.2.7indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point2.0.0indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-generator-function1.1.2indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-nan1.3.2indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-obj4.1.0indirect
npmis-regex1.2.1indirect
npmis-typed-array1.1.15indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak4.1.1indirect
npmjson52.2.3indirect
npmlocate-path3.0.0indirect
npmlodash.debounce4.0.8indirect
npmlodash.throttle4.1.1indirect
npmlru-cache11.2.2indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmemfs4.49.0indirect
npmminimatch10.2.4indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmobject-is1.1.6indirect
npmobject-keys1.1.1indirect
npmobject.assign4.1.7indirect
npmp-limit2.3.0indirect
npmp-locate3.0.0indirect
npmp-try2.2.0indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.1indirect
npmpath0.12.7indirect
npmpath-exists3.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.0indirect
npmpath-unified0.2.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpossible-typed-array-names1.1.0indirect
npmprettier2.8.0indirect
npmprettier3.6.2indirect
npmprocess0.11.10indirect
npmpunycode1.4.1indirect
npmqs6.15.0indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmrequire-main-filename2.0.0indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsafe-regex-test1.1.0indirect
npmset-blocking2.0.0indirect
npmset-function-length1.2.2indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.0indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.0indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmstream0.0.3indirect
npmstring-width3.1.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi5.2.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.2indirect
npmstyle-dictionary5.1.1indirect
npmthingies2.5.0indirect
npmtinycolor21.6.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtree-dump1.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmurl0.11.4indirect
npmutil0.10.4indirect
npmutil0.12.5indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwhich-module2.0.0indirect
npmwhich-typed-array1.1.19indirect
npmwrap-ansi5.1.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmy18n4.0.3indirect
npmyargs13.3.2indirect
npmyargs-parser13.1.2indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 164 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion5.0.5indirecthigh45.0.9
style-dictionary5.1.1indirecthigh15.4.4
qs6.15.0indirectmoderate36.16.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.