omnifed/cerberus holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (49/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
88
overall / 100
Excellent
Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25
Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40
No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
source
osv
advisories
16
affected_packages
1
assessed_packages
36
unassessed_packages
47
affected_by_severity
high 1
direct_affected_packages
0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 36 resolved dependencies against OSV. 47 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20
MCP server
40/40
Runnable examples — example, examples, recipes
Inputs used
example_dirs
example, examples, recipes
has_mcp_signal
yes
api_schema_files
—
interfaces_expected_of
—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
34GitHub stars
6contributors
1,402commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
2open issues
npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
npm package 'cerberus' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Jomik/cerberus); excluded from ecosystem scoring
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 12 ⇿
0Stars
12Forks
99Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Major 1Minor 31Patch 43
Each point covers 3 days.
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 07:52 UTC
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 77 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
Registry
Package
Version
Relation
npm
@preact/signals-core
^1.14.2
direct
npm
@reactively/core
^0.0.8
direct
npm
@tanstack/query-core
^5.104.0
direct
npm
alien-signals
^3.2.1
direct
npm
signia
^0.1.5
direct
npm
typescript
catalog:ts
direct
npm
@ark-ui/react
catalog:ark
indirect
npm
@carbon/icons-react
catalog:jsx
indirect
npm
@clack/prompts
^1.8.1
indirect
npm
@csstools/postcss-cascade-layers
^6.0.1
indirect
npm
@expressive-code/plugin-line-numbers
^0.44.2
indirect
npm
@figma/rest-api-spec
^0.44.0
indirect
npm
@happy-dom/global-registrator
^21.0.1
indirect
npm
@internationalized/date
^3.12.4
indirect
npm
@mdx-js/loader
^3.1.1
indirect
npm
@mdx-js/react
^3.1.1
indirect
npm
@pandacss/dev
catalog:pandacss
indirect
npm
@pandacss/preset-panda
catalog:pandacss
indirect
npm
@pandacss/types
catalog:pandacss
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.android-arm64
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.android-x64
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.darwin-arm64
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.darwin-x64
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.freebsd-x64
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.linux-arm64
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.linux-arm64-musl
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.linux-ppc64
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.linux-riscv64
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.linux-s390x
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.linux-x64
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.linux-x64-musl
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.win32-arm64
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@pnpm/exe.win32-x64
12.11.2
indirect
npm
@shikijs/rehype
^4.4.3
indirect
npm
@shikijs/transformers
^4.4.3
indirect
npm
@testing-library/jest-dom
^7.0.1
indirect
npm
@testing-library/react
^16.3.3
indirect
npm
@testing-library/user-event
^14.6.7
indirect
npm
@types/bun
catalog:types
indirect
npm
@types/mdx
^2.0.14
indirect
npm
@types/node
catalog:types
indirect
npm
@types/react
catalog:jsx
indirect
npm
@types/react-dom
catalog:jsx
indirect
npm
@types/semver
^7.8.0
indirect
npm
@typescript/typescript6
catalog:jsx
indirect
npm
@vercel/analytics
^2.0.1
indirect
npm
@vitejs/plugin-react
catalog:jsx
indirect
npm
autoprefixer
^10.6.1
indirect
npm
babel-plugin-react-compiler
^1.0.0
indirect
npm
dotenv
^18.0.4
indirect
npm
eslint
^9.21.0
indirect
npm
eslint-config-next
16.4.0
indirect
npm
eslint-import-resolver-typescript
^4.4.5
indirect
npm
glob
^13.0.6
indirect
npm
globby
catalog:jsx
indirect
npm
hast-util-to-jsx-runtime
2.3.6
indirect
npm
mitata
^1.0.34
indirect
npm
next
16.4.0
indirect
npm
ora
^9.3.0
indirect
npm
oxfmt
catalog:oxc
indirect
npm
picocolors
^1.1.1
indirect
npm
pnpm
12.11.2
indirect
npm
react
catalog:jsx
indirect
npm
react-dom
catalog:jsx
indirect
npm
rehype-autolink-headings
^7.1.0
indirect
npm
rehype-expressive-code
^0.44.2
indirect
npm
rehype-pretty-code
^0.14.5
indirect
npm
rehype-slug
^6.0.0
indirect
npm
rehype-stringify
^10.0.1
indirect
npm
remark-emoji
^5.0.2
indirect
npm
remark-frontmatter
^5.0.0
indirect
npm
remark-gfm
^4.0.1
indirect
npm
remark-mdx-frontmatter
^6.0.0
indirect
npm
remark-parse
^11.0.0
indirect
npm
remove
^0.1.5
indirect
npm
semver
^7.8.5
indirect
npm
shiki
^4.4.3
indirect
npm
unist-util-visit
^5.1.0
indirect
npm
util
^0.12.5
indirect
npm
velite
^0.4.0
indirect
npm
vite
catalog:jsx
indirect
npm
vite-plugin-dts
catalog:jsx
indirect
npm
yaml
^2.9.1
indirect
Dependency advisories 1
This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 36 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 47 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.
Package
Version
Relation
Severity
Advisories
Fixed in
vite
catalog:jsx
indirect
high
16
8.0.16
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Related records
Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with omnifed/cerberus. Read them side by side →
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
