Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 00:10 UTC

mche / sost

внутренний корпоративный веб-портал учета

JavaScript · HTMLNo license detected★ 2 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2017View on GitHub ↗

mche/sost holds a health index of 4 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (41/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 414 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

4
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

4
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 27 is calibrated to 21 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

6 followers71 public repossince Dec 2012есть

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

18Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 414 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push414
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 2,247 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2,247
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars2
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

34At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.996
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
17.5/30PR acceptance — 7/12 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs7
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs5
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
6.1/25Owner reach — 6 followers of mche
25/25Track record — 71 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmche
public_repos71
account_age_days5,011
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

41Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc, .eslintrc.js, .eslintrc.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsperl, mojolicious, angularjs, postgresql, portal, webapp, vuejs
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

24At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate2.3
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier20
security_posture_after_multiplier5
security_posture_before_jurisdiction23
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages6
unassessed_packages198
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 6 resolved dependencies against OSV. 198 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — 0 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — static/lib/debounce/Makefile
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc, .eslintrc.js, .eslintrc.json
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesstatic/lib/debounce/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 25/2,172 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes1,377,907
source_files_sampled2,172
oversized_source_files25
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
2contributors
0commits, last 12 months
414days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.3 / 10
2.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 00:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 204

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 204 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/cli^7.0.0-beta.44indirect
npm@babel/core^7.0.0indirect
npm@babel/core^7.0.0-beta.44indirect
npm@babel/core^7.9.6indirect
npm@babel/node^7.0.0-beta.44indirect
npm@babel/plugin-proposal-class-properties^7.1.0indirect
npm@babel/plugin-syntax-dynamic-import^7.0.0indirect
npm@babel/plugin-syntax-jsx^7.0.0indirect
npm@babel/plugin-transform-flow-strip-types^7.0.0indirect
npm@babel/preset-env^7.0.0indirect
npm@babel/preset-env^7.0.0-beta.44indirect
npm@babel/preset-env^7.9.6indirect
npm@babel/register^7.0.0indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-buble^0.21.3indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-commonjs^11.1.0indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-node-resolve^7.1.3indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-node-resolve^9.0.0indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-replace^2.3.2indirect
npm@types/node^12.12.0indirect
npm@types/node^13.13.5indirect
npm@types/webpack^4.4.22indirect
npmacorn^5.2.1indirect
npmautoprefixer^9.0.1indirect
npmbabel-core^7.0.0-bridge.0indirect
npmbabel-eslint^10.0.1indirect
npmbabel-helper-vue-jsx-merge-props^2.0.3indirect
npmbabel-jest^22.4.3indirect
npmbabel-jest^26.0.1indirect
npmbabel-loader^8.0.4indirect
npmbabel-loader^8.1.0indirect
npmbabel-plugin-external-helpers^6.22.0indirect
npmbabel-plugin-istanbul^5.1.0indirect
npmbabel-plugin-transform-vue-jsx^4.0.1indirect
npmbabel-preset-flow-vue^1.0.0indirect
npmblueimp-canvas-to-blob3.5.0indirect
npmblueimp-load-image2.12.2indirect
npmblueimp-tmpl3.6.0indirect
npmbower-json0.8.1indirect
npmbrotli^1.3.2indirect
npmbrowserify-versionify^1.0.6indirect
npmbuble^0.19.3indirect
npmchalk^2.3.0indirect
npmchalk^4.0.0indirect
npmchromedriver^2.45.0indirect
npmcodecov^3.0.0indirect
npmcodecov^3.7.1indirect
npmcommitizen^2.9.6indirect
npmconventional-changelog^1.1.3indirect
npmconventional-changelog-cli^2.0.31indirect
npmcross-env^5.1.6indirect
npmcross-env^5.2.0indirect
npmcross-spawn^6.0.5indirect
npmcss-loader^2.1.0indirect
npmcssnano^4.0.3indirect
npmcz-conventional-changelog^2.0.0indirect
npmde-indent^1.0.2indirect
npmenquirer^2.3.5indirect
npmes6-promise^4.1.0indirect
npmescodegen^1.8.1indirect
npmeslint^4.19.1indirect
npmeslint^4.2.0indirect
npmeslint^5.2.0indirect
npmeslint^5.7.0indirect
npmeslint^6.8.0indirect
npmeslint-config-airbnb-base^12.1.0indirect
npmeslint-config-standard^6.1.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-flowtype^2.34.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import^2.10.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-jasmine^2.8.4indirect
npmeslint-plugin-jest^21.15.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-promise^3.5.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-standard^3.0.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-vue-libs^4.0.0indirect
npmexeca^4.0.0indirect
npmexpress^4.17.1indirect
npmfile-loader^3.0.1indirect
npmflow-bin^0.61.0indirect
npmgrunt^0.4.5indirect
npmgrunt~0.4.1indirect
npmgrunt-autoprefixer^0.7.2indirect
npmgrunt-contrib-connect~0.5.0indirect
npmgrunt-contrib-cssmin^0.7.0indirect
npmgrunt-contrib-cssmin~0.7.0indirect
npmgrunt-contrib-htmlmin^0.1.3indirect
npmgrunt-contrib-less^1.0.0indirect
npmgrunt-contrib-sass~0.6.0indirect
npmgrunt-contrib-uglify^0.2.7indirect
npmgrunt-contrib-watch^0.5.3indirect
npmgrunt-contrib-watch~0.5.3indirect
npmgrunt-myth^1.0.1indirect
npmgrunt-processhtml^0.2.9indirect
npmgrunt-version^0.3.0indirect
npmgulp^3.9.1indirect
npmgulp^4.0.0indirect
npmgulp-browserify^0.5.1indirect
npmgulp-concat^2.6.1indirect
npmgulp-eslint^4.0.0indirect
npmgulp-git^2.4.1indirect
npmgulp-header^1.8.8indirect
npmgulp-header^2.0.1indirect
npmgulp-postcss^7.0.1indirect
npmgulp-rename^1.2.2indirect
npmgulp-sourcemaps^2.6.0indirect
npmgulp-tag-version^1.3.0indirect
npmgulp-uglify^3.0.0indirect
npmgulp-util^3.0.8indirect
npmgzip-size-cli^2.1.0indirect
npmhash-sum^1.0.2indirect
npmhe^1.1.1indirect
npmhttp-server^0.11.1indirect
npmhusky^0.14.3indirect
npmjasmine^2.6.0indirect
npmjasmine^2.99.0indirect
npmjasmine-core^2.6.4indirect
npmjasmine-core^2.99.0indirect
npmjasmine-core^2.99.1indirect
npmjest^22.4.3indirect
npmjest^26.0.1indirect
npmjshint2.9.3indirect
npmkarma^0.12.19indirect
npmkarma^1.7.0indirect
npmkarma^2.0.2indirect
npmkarma^3.1.1indirect
npmkarma-chrome-launcher^0.1.4indirect
npmkarma-chrome-launcher^2.1.1indirect
npmkarma-commonjs^1.0.0indirect
npmkarma-coverage^1.1.1indirect
npmkarma-firefox-launcher^1.0.1indirect
npmkarma-jasmine^0.1.5indirect
npmkarma-jasmine^1.1.0indirect
npmkarma-jasmine^1.1.2indirect
npmkarma-mocha-reporter^2.2.3indirect
npmkarma-phantomjs-launcher^1.0.4indirect
npmkarma-safari-launcher^1.0.0indirect
npmkarma-sauce-launcher^1.1.0indirect
npmkarma-sauce-launcher^2.0.2indirect
npmkarma-sourcemap-loader^0.3.7indirect
npmkarma-webpack^4.0.0-rc.2indirect
npmlint-staged^7.0.0indirect
npmlint-staged^8.0.0indirect
npmload-grunt-tasks~3.3.0indirect
npmlodash^4.17.4indirect
npmlodash.template^4.4.0indirect
npmlodash.uniq^4.5.0indirect
npmlru-cache^5.1.1indirect
npmmicrobundle^0.11.0indirect
npmminijasminenode^1.1.1indirect
npmmocha*indirect
npmmockdate^2.0.2indirect
npmmoment^2.22.0indirect
npmncp^2.0.0indirect
npmnightwatch^0.9.16indirect
npmnightwatch-helpers^1.2.0indirect
npmphantomjs-prebuilt^2.1.14indirect
npmpre-commit^1.2.2indirect
npmprettier^1.10.2indirect
npmprettier^1.16.1indirect
npmpump^1.0.2indirect
npmpuppeteer^1.11.0indirect
npmpuppeteer^4.0.0indirect
npmregenerator-runtime^0.13.5indirect
npmresolve^1.3.3indirect
npmrollup^0.57.1indirect
npmrollup^1.0.0indirect
npmrollup^2.0.0indirect
npmrollup^2.8.2indirect
npmrollup-plugin-alias^1.3.1indirect
npmrollup-plugin-babel^4.0.0-beta.4indirect
npmrollup-plugin-buble^0.19.6indirect
npmrollup-plugin-commonjs^9.2.0indirect
npmrollup-plugin-flow-no-whitespace^1.0.0indirect
npmrollup-plugin-node-resolve^4.0.0indirect
npmrollup-plugin-replace^2.0.0indirect
npmrollup-plugin-svelte^6.0.0indirect
npmrollup-plugin-terser^5.3.0indirect
npmrollup-plugin-uglify^3.0.0indirect
npmrun-sequence^2.2.1indirect
npmselenium-server^2.53.1indirect
npmsemver^7.3.2indirect
npmserialize-javascript^3.1.0indirect
npmshelljs^0.8.1indirect
npmshould*indirect
npmsinon1.7.3indirect
npmsinon^1.17.7indirect
npmsize-limit^0.18.0indirect
npmstart-server-and-test^1.11.0indirect
npmsvelte^3.0.0indirect
npmterser^3.10.2indirect
npmtodomvc-app-css^2.1.0indirect
npmtypescript^2.8.3indirect
npmtypescript^3.6.4indirect
npmtypescript^3.8.3indirect
npmvue^2.5.22indirect
npmvue-loader^15.2.1indirect
npmvue-template-compiler^2.5.22indirect
npmvuepress^0.14.1indirect
npmvuepress-theme-vue^1.1.0indirect
npmwebpack^4.43.0indirect
npmwebpack~4.28.4indirect
npmwebpack-dev-middleware^3.7.2indirect
npmwebpack-hot-middleware^2.25.0indirect
npmweex-js-runtime^0.23.6indirect
npmweex-styler^0.3.0indirect
npmyorkie^2.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 6 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 198 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.