Public record
Software health reportschema 0.25.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 22:39 UTC

mediachain / aleph

א: The mediachain universe manipulation engine

JavaScriptMIT★ 39 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Aug 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

mediachain/aleph holds a health index of 21 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (57/100) and lowest on Security (21/100). It was last updated 2239 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

21
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

21
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 40 is calibrated to 35 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MediachainOrganization
15 followers29 public repossince Jan 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npmaleph1.7.059123416 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

25At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 2,239 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.95
days_since_last_push2,239
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases10 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 3,416 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~14.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count10
latest_release_tagv1.7.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3,416
mean_days_between_releases14.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
25.6/60Stars39 stars
9.6/25Forks15 forks
2.7/15Watchers4 watchers
Inputs used
forks15
stars39
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
23.7/80Monthly downloads59 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesaleph
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads59
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 88% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.878
How it's scored
28.2/42Issue resolution67% of issues closed
20.1/30PR acceptance125/187 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 5/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs125
open_issues24
closed_issues49
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.671
closed_unmerged_prs62
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
8.7/25Owner reach15 followers of mediachain
22.8/25Track record29 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers15
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginmediachain
public_repos29
account_age_days3,840
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 3,416 days ago
20/20Version history12 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesaleph
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3,416

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

21At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 5/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities113 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate2.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
4.3/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories5 affected: knex 0.12.9 (critical 9.8), libp2p-secio 0.6.8 (critical 9.1), node-fetch 1.7.3 (high 8.8), +2 more
1.6/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories16 affected: decompress 3.0.0 (critical 9.8), minimist 1.1.3 (critical 9.8), braces 1.8.5 (high 7.5), +13 more
9/40No advisories left outstanding19 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,605 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories25
affected_packages21
assessed_packages644
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 4, high 10, moderate 7
direct_affected_packages5
Matched the npm:aleph@1.7.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 644 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
12.9/40Legible commit history23 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.242
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/121 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes29,711
source_files_sampled121
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)src/protobuf/dir.proto, src/protobuf/manifest.proto, src/protobuf/node.proto, src/protobuf/stmt.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filessrc/protobuf/dir.proto, src/protobuf/manifest.proto, src/protobuf/node.proto, src/protobuf/stmt.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

39GitHub stars
4contributors
0commits, last 12 months
2,239days since last push
10releases
1bus factor
24open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 39 ★ / 15 ⇿
39Stars
15Forks
10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040391552016-102021-032025-08
Major 0Minor 7Patch 3

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.3 / 10
2.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 22:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 5/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities113 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 44
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmajv^4.9.2package.json
npmbin-build^2.2.0package.json
npmborc^2.0.1package.json
npmbyline^5.0.0package.json
npmdigest-stream^2.0.0package.json
npmduplex-child-process0.0.5package.json
npmgunzip-maybe^1.3.1package.json
npmknex^0.12.6package.json
npmlevelup^1.3.3package.json
npmlibp2p-crypto^0.8.0package.json
npmlibp2p-ping^0.3.0package.json
npmlibp2p-secio^0.6.4package.json
npmlibp2p-spdy^0.10.1package.json
npmlibp2p-swarm^0.26.2package.json
npmlibp2p-tcp^0.9.1package.json
npmlibp2p-websockets^0.9.1package.json
npmlocks^0.2.2package.json
npmlodash^4.17.1package.json
npmmafmt^2.1.5package.json
npmmap-stream^0.0.6package.json
npmmemdown^1.2.4package.json
npmmkdirp^0.5.1package.json
npmmultiaddr^2.1.3package.json
npmmultihashes^0.4.3package.json
npmndjson^1.4.3package.json
npmnode-fetch^1.6.3package.json
npmpeer-book^0.3.0package.json
npmpeer-id^0.8.0package.json
npmpeer-info^0.8.0package.json
npmprotocol-buffers^3.2.0package.json
npmpull-abortable^4.1.0package.json
npmpull-length-prefixed^1.2.0package.json
npmpull-paramap^1.2.1package.json
npmpull-promise^2.0.0package.json
npmpull-pushable^2.0.1package.json
npmpull-stream^3.5.0package.json
npmpull-window^2.1.4package.json
npmsqlite3^3.1.8package.json
npmtar-streamhttps://registry.npmjs.org/tar-stream/-/tar-stream-1.5.2.tgzpackage.json
npmtemp^0.8.3package.json
npmthenify-all^1.6.0package.json
npmtunnel-ssh^4.1.1package.json
npmuuid^3.0.1package.json
npmyargs^6.3.0package.json
All dependencies 64

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 43 direct and 21 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmajv^4.9.2direct
npmbin-build^2.2.0direct
npmborc^2.0.1direct
npmbyline^5.0.0direct
npmdigest-stream^2.0.0direct
npmduplex-child-process0.0.5direct
npmgunzip-maybe^1.3.1direct
npmknex^0.12.6direct
npmlevelup^1.3.3direct
npmlibp2p-crypto^0.8.0direct
npmlibp2p-ping^0.3.0direct
npmlibp2p-secio^0.6.4direct
npmlibp2p-spdy^0.10.1direct
npmlibp2p-swarm^0.26.2direct
npmlibp2p-tcp^0.9.1direct
npmlibp2p-websockets^0.9.1direct
npmlocks^0.2.2direct
npmlodash^4.17.1direct
npmmafmt^2.1.5direct
npmmap-stream^0.0.6direct
npmmemdown^1.2.4direct
npmmkdirp^0.5.1direct
npmmultiaddr^2.1.3direct
npmmultihashes^0.4.3direct
npmndjson^1.4.3direct
npmnode-fetch^1.6.3direct
npmpeer-book^0.3.0direct
npmpeer-id^0.8.0direct
npmpeer-info^0.8.0direct
npmprotocol-buffers^3.2.0direct
npmpull-abortable^4.1.0direct
npmpull-length-prefixed^1.2.0direct
npmpull-paramap^1.2.1direct
npmpull-promise^2.0.0direct
npmpull-pushable^2.0.1direct
npmpull-stream^3.5.0direct
npmpull-window^2.1.4direct
npmsqlite3^3.1.8direct
npmtemp^0.8.3direct
npmthenify-all^1.6.0direct
npmtunnel-ssh^4.1.1direct
npmuuid^3.0.1direct
npmyargs^6.3.0direct
npmbabel-cli^6.22.0indirect
npmbabel-eslint^7.1.0indirect
npmbabel-plugin-istanbul^3.1.2indirect
npmbabel-plugin-transform-flow-strip-types^6.22.0indirect
npmbabel-register^6.22.0indirect
npmchai^3.5.0indirect
npmchai-as-promised^6.0.0indirect
npmcoveralls^2.11.15indirect
npmeslint-plugin-flowtype^2.30.3indirect
npmflow-bin^0.41.0indirect
npmgh-pages^0.12.0indirect
npmink-docstrap^1.3.0indirect
npminterface-connection^0.3.0indirect
npmjsdoc^3.4.3indirect
npmjsdoc-babel^0.3.0indirect
npmmocha^3.2.0indirect
npmmocha-eventually^1.1.0indirect
npmmocha-lcov-reporter^1.2.0indirect
npmnyc^10.0.0indirect
npmstandard^8.6.0indirect
npmstd-mocks^1.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 21

Installing npm:aleph@1.7.0 pulls in 644 packages, direct and transitive: 21 carry known advisories, of which 5 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
knex0.12.9directcritical22.4.0
libp2p-secio0.6.8directcritical10.9.0
decompress3.0.0indirectcritical211.1.3
minimist1.1.3indirectcritical21.2.6
node-fetch1.7.3directhigh13.1.1
uuid3.4.0directhigh113.0.1
braces1.8.5indirecthigh13.0.3
elliptic6.6.1indirecthigh1
ip1.1.9indirecthigh1
lodash.template3.6.2indirecthigh14.17.21
semver5.4.1indirecthigh17.5.2
url-regex3.2.0indirecthigh1
uuid2.0.3indirecthigh113.0.1
ws1.1.5indirecthigh18.21.0
ajv4.11.8directmoderate28.18.0
bn.js1.3.0indirectmoderate15.2.3
got5.7.1indirectmoderate112.1.0
ip-address5.9.4indirectmoderate110.1.1
micromatch2.3.11indirectmoderate14.0.8
tunnel-agent0.4.3indirectmoderate10.6.0
yargs-parser4.2.1indirectmoderate118.1.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.25.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.