Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-26 22:26 UTC

meshmakers / octo-communication-sdk

OctoMesh Communication SDK — Adapter framework, ETL pipeline, hub contracts (cut from octo-sdk in Phase 3 of the YAML migration)

C#MIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

meshmakers/octo-communication-sdk holds a health index of 41 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (60/100) and lowest on Security (34/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

41
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

41
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 44 is calibrated to 41 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

meshmakers.ioOrganization
6 followers42 public repossince Sep 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.Adapters3.4.98-700 days agooctodatameshiotcommunicationadapterpipeline
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.Pipeline3.4.98-690 days agooctodatameshiotcommunicationadapterpipeline
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.Common.Web3.4.98-6970 days agooctodatameshiotcommunicationadapterpipeline
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.SimulationNodes3.4.98-4580 days agooctodatameshiotcommunicationadapterpipeline
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.CommunicationAdapter3.4.98-690 days agooctodatameshiotcommunicationadapterpipeline

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

36Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

59Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence — 11/52 weeks with commits
15.7/18Commit volume — 55 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year55
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year11

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

71Good
How it's scored
56.5/80Total downloads — 276,771 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.Adapters, Meshmakers.Octo.Sdk.Pipeline, Meshmakers.Octo.Sdk.Common.Web, Meshmakers.Octo.Sdk.SimulationNodes, Meshmakers.Octo.Sdk.CommunicationAdapter
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads276,771
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 79% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.786

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 11/11 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs11
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

56Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.1/25Owner reach — 6 followers of meshmakers
19.8/25Track record — 42 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmeshmakers
public_repos42
account_age_days1,442

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 5 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 697 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.Adapters, Meshmakers.Octo.Sdk.Pipeline, Meshmakers.Octo.Sdk.Common.Web, Meshmakers.Octo.Sdk.SimulationNodes, Meshmakers.Octo.Sdk.CommunicationAdapter
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

46Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

34At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

34At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 51 of 56 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.911
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

66Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — samples/Sdk.Plugs.Sample/Sdk.Plugs.Sample.csproj, samples/Sdk.Socket.WebSample/Sdk.Socket.WebSample.csproj, src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 40 of the last 56 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.714
toolchain_manifestssamples/Sdk.Plugs.Sample/Sdk.Plugs.Sample.csproj, samples/Sdk.Socket.WebSample/Sdk.Socket.WebSample.csproj, src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj, src/Sdk.Common.Web/Sdk.Common.Web.csproj, src/Sdk.CommunicationAdapter/Sdk.CommunicationAdapter.csproj, src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj, src/Sdk.Plug.Simulation/Sdk.Plug.Simulation.csproj, src/Sdk.SimulationNodes/Sdk.SimulationNodes.csproj, tests/Sdk.Common.IntegrationTests/Sdk.Common.IntegrationTests.csproj, tests/Sdk.Common.PipelineParityTests/Sdk.Common.PipelineParityTests.csproj, tests/Sdk.Common.Tests/Sdk.Common.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/343 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes55,681
source_files_sampled343
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

0GitHub stars
5contributors
55commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-26 22:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Common.DistributionEventHub$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Communication.Contracts$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.Contracts$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.Common$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.ServiceClient$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration10.0.11src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.11src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting10.0.11src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging10.0.11src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options10.0.11src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj
NuGetNLog6.2.0src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj
NuGetNLog.Extensions.Logging6.2.0src/Sdk.Adapters/Sdk.Adapters.csproj
NuGetBogus35.6.5src/Sdk.CommunicationAdapter/Sdk.CommunicationAdapter.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Communication.Contracts$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Sdk.CommunicationAdapter/Sdk.CommunicationAdapter.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.MsBuildTasks$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Sdk.CommunicationAdapter/Sdk.CommunicationAdapter.csproj
NuGetLiteDB5.0.21src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Common.Shared$(MeshmakerVersion)src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Common.DistributionEventHub$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Communication.Contracts$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.ConstructionKit.Contracts$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Runtime.Contracts$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetMeshmakers.Octo.Sdk.ServiceClient$(OctoCoreLibVersion)src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Scripting5.3.0src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting10.0.11src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http10.0.11src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetNJsonSchema11.6.1src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetNLog.Extensions.Logging6.2.0src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetYamlDotNet18.1.0src/Sdk.Pipeline/Sdk.Pipeline.csproj
NuGetBogus35.6.5src/Sdk.SimulationNodes/Sdk.SimulationNodes.csproj
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with meshmakers/octo-communication-sdk. Read them side by side →

89PHOENIXCONTACT/MORYX-Framework:gear: .NET based framework to quickly build three-tier applications.Excellent8451Degrees/pipeline-dotnet51Degrees Pipeline for .NETExcellent8451Degrees/device-detection-dotnetDevice detection services for 51Degrees PipelineExcellent100PrefectHQ/prefectPrefect is a workflow orchestration framework for building resilient data pipelines in Python.Exceptional95PRQL/prqlPRQL is a modern language for transforming data — a simple, powerful, pipelined SQL replacementExceptional95airbytehq/airbyteOpen-source data movement for ELT pipelines and AI agents — from APIs, databases & files to warehouses, lakes, and AI applications. Both self-hosted and Cloud.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.