Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-13 19:25 UTC

mguinea / laravel-robots

Laravel package to manage robots

PHPMIT★ 15 stars⑂ 6 forkssince Aug 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#laravel#robots#robots-txt#package#seo#seotools

mguinea/laravel-robots holds a health index of 30 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (50/100) and lowest on Vitality (27/100). It was last updated 76 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

30
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

30
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 40 is calibrated to 35 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Marc GuineaPersonal account
18 followers12 public repossince Feb 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistmguinea/laravel-robots3.1.41,30217657 days agorobotslaravel

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

27At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

18Critical
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 76 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.92
days_since_last_push76
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

40Weak
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 17 version tags (no GitHub releases)
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 657 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~196.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tag3.1.4
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release657
mean_days_between_releases196.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

24At Risk
How it's scored
18.6/60Stars — 15 stars
5.8/25Forks — 6 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars15
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

42Weak
How it's scored
41.5/80Monthly downloads — 1,302 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesmguinea/laravel-robots
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads65,792
monthly_downloads1,302
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

14Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.968

Issue & PR responsiveness

73Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
21.4/30PR acceptance — 10/14 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs10
open_issues0
closed_issues7
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

49Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
9.2/25Owner reach — 18 followers of mguinea
20.1/25Track record — 12 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers18
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmguinea
public_repos12
account_age_days4,203
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

79Good
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
14/35Publish recency — latest publish 657 days ago
20/20Version history — 17 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmguinea/laravel-robots
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish657

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

38Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaravel, robots, robots-txt, package, seo, seotools
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

25At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 32 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories32
affected_packages12
assessed_packages105
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 7, moderate 5
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 105 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

37Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.1/40Legible commit history — 64 of 92 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.696
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 8 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.08
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/11 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes5,173
source_files_sampled11
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

15GitHub stars
3contributors
0commits, last 12 months
76days since last push
17releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
2Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456622023-012024-102026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 2

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.5 / 10
2.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-13 19:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities32 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/database^6.0|^7.0|^8.0|^9.0|^10.0|^11.0|^12.0composer.json
All dependencies 105

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 105 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbrick/math0.11.0indirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-data3.0.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/inflector2.0.6indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator2.0.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.0indirect
Packagistdragonmantank/cron-expression3.3.2indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator4.0.1indirect
Packagistfakerphp/faker1.21.0indirect
Packagistfruitcake/php-cors1.2.0indirect
Packagistgraham-campbell/result-type1.1.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.5.0indirect
Packagisthamcrest/hamcrest-php2.0.1indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework9.49.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/serializable-closure1.3.0indirect
Packagistleague/commonmark2.3.8indirect
Packagistleague/config1.2.0indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem3.12.2indirect
Packagistleague/mime-type-detection1.11.0indirect
Packagistmockery/mockery1.5.1indirect
Packagistmonolog/monolog2.8.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.11.0indirect
Packagistnesbot/carbon2.66.0indirect
Packagistnette/schema1.2.3indirect
Packagistnette/utils3.2.9indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser4.15.3indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/termwind1.15.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench7.20.0indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core7.20.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.3indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpoption/phpoption1.9.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage9.2.24indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator3.0.6indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker3.1.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template2.0.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer5.0.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit9.5.28indirect
Packagistpimple/pimple3.5.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistramsey/collection2.0.0indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid 4-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit1.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup2.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator4.0.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity2.0.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment5.1.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter4.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state5.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code1.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector2.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context4.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/type3.2.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version3.0.2indirect
Packagistspatie/backtrace1.2.1indirect
Packagistspatie/laravel-ray1.32.1indirect
Packagistspatie/macroable2.0.0indirect
Packagistspatie/ray1.36.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/console6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/error-handler6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation6.2.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel6.2.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/mailer6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/mime6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-iconv1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php721.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-uuid1.27.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/string6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts3.2.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/uid6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper6.2.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml6.2.5indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.1indirect
Packagisttijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles2.2.6indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv5.5.0indirect
Packagistvoku/portable-ascii2.0.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.11.0indirect
Packagistzbateson/mail-mime-parser2.3.0indirect
Packagistzbateson/mb-wrapper1.2.0indirect
Packagistzbateson/stream-decorators1.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 105 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
laravel/framework9.49.0indirecthigh413.12.0
league/commonmark2.3.8indirecthigh102.9.0
nesbot/carbon2.66.0indirecthigh13.8.4
phpunit/phpunit9.5.28indirecthigh112.5.8
symfony/http-foundation6.2.6indirecthigh27.3.7
symfony/mailer6.2.5indirecthigh18.0.12
symfony/process6.2.5indirecthigh17.1.7
guzzlehttp/psr72.5.0indirectmoderate42.12.3
symfony/mime6.2.5indirectmoderate28.0.12
symfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.27.0indirectmoderate11.38.1
symfony/routing6.2.5indirectmoderate28.0.13
symfony/yaml6.2.5indirectmoderate38.0.12

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with mguinea/laravel-robots. Read them side by side →

86larastan/larastan⚗️ Adds code analysis to Laravel improving developer productivity and code quality.Excellent83mike-bronner/laravel-model-cachingEloquent model-caching made easy.Excellent83Astrotomic/laravel-translatableA Laravel package for multilingual modelsExcellent81spatie/laravel-sitemapCreate and generate sitemaps with easeExcellent90kpumuk/meta-tagsSearch Engine Optimization (SEO) for Ruby on Rails applications.Excellent98api-platform/coreThe server component of API Platform: hypermedia and GraphQL APIs in minutesExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.