Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 20:58 UTC

microsoft / ApplicationInsights-dotnet

ApplicationInsights-dotnet

C#MIT★ 612 stars⑂ 300 forkssince Jun 2015View on GitHub ↗

microsoft/ApplicationInsights-dotnet holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (92/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (71/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 84 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MicrosoftOrganization · verified domain
129,645 followers8,301 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

85Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence33/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume282 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained10 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year282
human_commit_share0.9
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year33
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 107 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~100.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv3.1.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release107
mean_days_between_releases100.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

84Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
45.2/60Stars612 stars
20.6/25Forks300 forks
11.4/15Watchers112 watchers
Inputs used
forks300
stars612
watchers112
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

92Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 24% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth91 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled91
top_contributor_share0.235
How it's scored
41.3/42Issue resolution98% of issues closed
25.2/30PR acceptance1,356/1,613 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs1,356
open_issues27
closed_issues1,547
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.983
closed_unmerged_prs257
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach129,645 followers of microsoft
25/25Track record8,301 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers129,645
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmicrosoft
public_repos8,301
account_age_days4,660

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapplication-insights, telemetry, sdk, azure, distributed-tracing, monitoring, observability, logging
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

86Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

82Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained10 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
4.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate8.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages44
unassessed_packages27
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 44 resolved dependencies against OSV. 27 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

82Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32/40Legible commit history54 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.6
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,447
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapBASE/Test/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.Test/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.Tests/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.Tests.csproj, BASE/src/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.csproj, LOGGING/src/NLogTarget/NLogTarget.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice12 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance10 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.12
toolchain_manifestsBASE/Test/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.Test/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.Tests/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.Tests.csproj, BASE/src/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.csproj, LOGGING/src/NLogTarget/NLogTarget.csproj, LOGGING/test/NLogTarget.Tests/NLogTarget.Tests.csproj, NETCORE/src/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.AspNetCore/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.AspNetCore.csproj, NETCORE/src/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.WorkerService/Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.WorkerService.csproj, NETCORE/test/IntegrationTests.Tests/IntegrationTests.Tests.csproj, NETCORE/test/IntegrationTests.WebApp/IntegrationTests.WebApp.csproj, NETCORE/test/IntegrationTests.WorkerApp/IntegrationTests.WorkerApp.csproj, NETCORE/test/WorkerIntegrationTests.Tests/WorkerIntegrationTests.Tests.csproj, WEB/Src/Web/Web.Tests/Web.Tests.csproj, WEB/Src/Web/Web/Web.csproj, examples/AspNetCoreWebApp/AspNetCoreWebApp.csproj, examples/BackgroundTasksWithHostedService/BackgroundTasksWithHostedService.csproj, examples/BasicConsoleApp/BasicConsoleApp.csproj, examples/ClassicAspNetWebApp/ClassicAspNetWebApp.csproj, examples/ConsoleApp/ConsoleApp.csproj, examples/NLogConsoleApp/NLogConsoleApp.csproj, examples/WorkerService/WorkerService.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.1
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes2/185 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes95,901
source_files_sampled185
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

612GitHub stars
91contributors
282commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
4bus factor
27open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 300 ⇿
0Stars
300Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

05010015020025030029552015-082021-022026-08
Major 2Minor 22Patch 13

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.2 / 10
8.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 20:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained10 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 71

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 71 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAntlr3.5.0.2indirect
NuGetAzure.Identity1.11.4indirect
NuGetAzure.Monitor.OpenTelemetry.Exporterindirect
NuGetbootstrap5.2.3indirect
NuGetCastle.Coreindirect
NuGetCompareNETObjectsindirect
NuGetDesktop.Analyzers1.1.0indirect
NuGetjQuery3.7.0indirect
NuGetMicroBuild.Core0.3.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.FriendlyUrls1.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.FriendlyUrls.Core1.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Mvcindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.ScriptManager.MSAjax5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.ScriptManager.WebForms5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.TelemetryCorrelationindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Web.Optimization1.1.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Web.Optimization.WebForms1.1.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebApiindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.FxCopAnalyzers2.9.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.PublicApiAnalyzers2.9.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeDom.Providers.DotNetCompilerPlatform2.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Diagnostics.Tracing.EventRegister1.1.28indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.CommandLine5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hostingindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Httpindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Configuration5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug5.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Optionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdkindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Web.Infrastructure2.0.0indirect
NuGetModernizr2.8.3indirect
NuGetMoqindirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json10.0.3indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3indirect
NuGetNLogindirect
NuGetNLog.Extensions.Loggingindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetryindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.Consoleindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.InMemoryindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Extensions.Hostingindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AspNetindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AspNetCoreindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.Httpindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.SqlClientindirect
NuGetStyleCop.Analyzers1.1.118indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSourceindirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSource4.6.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.Process4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.StackTrace4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.FileSystem.AccessControl4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.NetworkInformation4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Requests4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Security4.3.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.WebHeaderCollection4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Serialization.Primitives4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Algorithms4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Thread4.3.0indirect
NuGetWebGrease1.6.0indirect
NuGetxunitindirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudioindirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 44 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 27 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
Newtonsoft.Json10.0.3indirecthigh113.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.