Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 22:31 UTC

microsoft / durabletask-mssql

Microsoft SQL storage provider for Durable Functions and the Durable Task Framework

C# · TSQLMIT★ 104 stars⑂ 36 forkssince Feb 2021View on GitHub ↗

microsoft/durabletask-mssql holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (64/100). It was last updated 12 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MicrosoftOrganization · verified domain
129,698 followers8,303 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 12 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence14/52 weeks with commits
14.3/18Commit volume38 commits in the last year
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
commits_last_year38
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push12
active_weeks_last_year14
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases32 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 39 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~73.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count32
latest_release_tagv1.8.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release39
mean_days_between_releases73.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32.7/60Stars104 stars
12.9/25Forks36 forks
5/15Watchers9 watchers
Inputs used
forks36
stars104
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
65.2/80Total downloads1,894,441 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMicrosoft.DurableTask.SqlServer, Microsoft.DurableTask.SqlServer.AzureFunctions
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads1,894,441
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 59% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth28 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled28
top_contributor_share0.587
How it's scored
30.2/42Issue resolution72% of issues closed
28.2/30PR acceptance125/133 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs125
open_issues43
closed_issues110
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.719
closed_unmerged_prs8
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach129,698 followers of microsoft
25/25Track record8,303 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers129,698
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmicrosoft
public_repos8,303
account_age_days4,661

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 39 days ago
20/20Version history18 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMicrosoft.DurableTask.SqlServer, Microsoft.DurableTask.SqlServer.AzureFunctions
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish39

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

81Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

81Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
6.8/7.5Maintained11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
0/5Packagingno data
1.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
3.5/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 7
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate8.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
39.7/40Legible commit history73 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.745
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,615
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/DurableTask.SqlServer.AzureFunctions/DurableTask.SqlServer.AzureFunctions.csproj, src/DurableTask.SqlServer/DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj, src/Functions.Worker.Extensions.DurableTask.SqlServer/Functions.Worker.Extensions.DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice11 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.11
toolchain_manifestssrc/DurableTask.SqlServer.AzureFunctions/DurableTask.SqlServer.AzureFunctions.csproj, src/DurableTask.SqlServer/DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj, src/Functions.Worker.Extensions.DurableTask.SqlServer/Functions.Worker.Extensions.DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj, test/DurableTask.SqlServer.AzureFunctions.Tests/DurableTask.SqlServer.AzureFunctions.Tests.csproj, test/DurableTask.SqlServer.Tests/DurableTask.SqlServer.Tests.csproj, test/PerformanceTests/PerformanceTests.csproj, tools/TestDBGenerator/TestDBGenerator.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes1/69 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes83,765
source_files_sampled69
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

104GitHub stars
28contributors
38commits, last 12 months
12days since last push
32releases
1bus factor
43open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 36 ⇿
0Stars
36Forks
32Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383622021-022023-112026-08
Major 1Minor 8Patch 10

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.1 / 10
8.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 22:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests22 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
9Maintained11 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
7SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 7
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.WebJobs.Extensions.DurableTasksrc/DurableTask.SqlServer.AzureFunctions/DurableTask.SqlServer.AzureFunctions.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.DurableTask.Coresrc/DurableTask.SqlServer/DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClientsrc/DurableTask.SqlServer/DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj
NuGetSemanticVersionsrc/DurableTask.SqlServer/DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj
NuGetAzure.Coresrc/DurableTask.SqlServer/DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj
NuGetAzure.Identitysrc/DurableTask.SqlServer/DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokenssrc/DurableTask.SqlServer/DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj
NuGetSystem.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwtsrc/DurableTask.SqlServer/DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Commonsrc/DurableTask.SqlServer/DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Jsonsrc/DurableTask.SqlServer/DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Extensions.Abstractionssrc/Functions.Worker.Extensions.DurableTask.SqlServer/Functions.Worker.Extensions.DurableTask.SqlServer.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.DurableTask.SqlServertools/TestDBGenerator/TestDBGenerator.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SqlServer.SqlManagementObjectstools/TestDBGenerator/TestDBGenerator.csproj
NuGetAzure.Identitytools/TestDBGenerator/TestDBGenerator.csproj
NuGetAzure.Coretools/TestDBGenerator/TestDBGenerator.csproj
All dependencies 20

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 7 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAzure.Coredirect
NuGetAzure.Identitydirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.DurableTask.Coredirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Extensions.Abstractionsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Azure.WebJobs.Extensions.DurableTaskdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClientdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.DurableTask.SqlServerdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokensdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SqlServer.SqlManagementObjectsdirect
NuGetSemanticVersiondirect
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Commondirect
NuGetSystem.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwtdirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Jsondirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.EventSourceindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Sdk.Functionsindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdkindirect
NuGetMoqindirect
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Exporter.InMemoryindirect
NuGetxunitindirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudioindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.