Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 08:46 UTC

microsoft / kiota-python

Abstractions library for Kiota generated Python clients

PythonMIT★ 30 stars⑂ 37 forkssince Aug 2022View on GitHub ↗

microsoft/kiota-python holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (60/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

95
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

95
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MicrosoftOrganization · verified domain
129,556 followers8,301 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-bundle1.12.3402,640360 days agokiotaopenapimicrosoftgraph
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-abstractions1.12.39,454,764710 days agokiotaopenapimicrosoftgraph

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
23.5/36Commit cadence — 34/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 420 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year420
human_commit_share0.49
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year34

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagmicrosoft-kiota-bundle-v1.12.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
23.7/60Stars — 30 stars
13/25Forks — 37 forks
6.7/15Watchers — 17 watchers
Inputs used
forks37
stars30
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 9,857,404 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmicrosoft-kiota-bundle, microsoft-kiota-abstractions
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads9,857,404
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

86Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 37% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 37 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 21 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled37
top_contributor_share0.372
How it's scored
32.8/42Issue resolution — 78% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance — 595/642 decided PRs merged
11.7/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 9/10 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs595
open_issues18
closed_issues64
prs_merged_7d6
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d9
prs_decided_30d10
issue_closed_ratio0.78
closed_unmerged_prs47
first_time_authors_30d5
first_time_prs_merged_30d9
first_time_prs_decided_30d10
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 129,556 followers of microsoft
25/25Track record — 8,301 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers129,556
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginmicrosoft
public_repos8,301
account_age_days4,658

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 71 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmicrosoft-kiota-bundle, microsoft-kiota-abstractions
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .pylintrc, packages/abstractions/pyproject.toml ([tool.isort], [tool.yapf]), packages/bundle/pyproject.toml ([tool.isort], [tool.yapf])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://aka.ms/kiota/docs
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspython, kiota, openapi
has_wikino
homepagehttps://aka.ms/kiota/docs
docs_sitehttps://aka.ms/kiota/docs
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

83Excellent · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 21 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages21
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 1 resolved dependencies against OSV. 21 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 46 of 49 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.939
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .pylintrc, packages/abstractions/pyproject.toml ([tool.isort], [tool.yapf]), packages/bundle/pyproject.toml ([tool.isort], [tool.yapf])
11/11Static type checking — packages/abstractions/kiota_abstractions/py.typed, packages/authentication/azure/kiota_authentication_azure/py.typed, packages/http/httpx/kiota_http/py.typed, packages/serialization/form/kiota_serialization_form/py.typed, packages/serialization/json/kiota_serialization_json/py.typed, packages/serialization/multipart/kiota_serialization_multipart/py.typed, packages/serialization/text/kiota_serialization_text/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 34 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/abstractions/kiota_abstractions/py.typed, packages/authentication/azure/kiota_authentication_azure/py.typed, packages/http/httpx/kiota_http/py.typed, packages/serialization/form/kiota_serialization_form/py.typed, packages/serialization/json/kiota_serialization_json/py.typed, packages/serialization/multipart/kiota_serialization_multipart/py.typed, packages/serialization/text/kiota_serialization_text/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.34
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (packages/abstractions/kiota_abstractions/py.typed, packages/authentication/azure/kiota_authentication_azure/py.typed, packages/http/httpx/kiota_http/py.typed, packages/serialization/form/kiota_serialization_form/py.typed, packages/serialization/json/kiota_serialization_json/py.typed, packages/serialization/multipart/kiota_serialization_multipart/py.typed, packages/serialization/text/kiota_serialization_text/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/268 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes32,193
source_files_sampled268
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

30GitHub stars
37contributors
420commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
18open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:microsoft-kiota-bundle@1.12.3; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 37 ⇿
0Stars
37Forks
84Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383722022-112024-102026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.9 / 10
7.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 08:45 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 21 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIstd-uritemplate>=2.0.0packages/abstractions/pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-api>=1.27.0packages/abstractions/pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk>=1.27.0packages/abstractions/pyproject.toml
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-abstractions>=1.11.1,<2.0.0packages/bundle/pyproject.toml
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-http>=1.11.1,<2.0.0packages/bundle/pyproject.toml
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-serialization-json>=1.11.1,<2.0.0packages/bundle/pyproject.toml
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-serialization-form>=1.11.1,<2.0.0packages/bundle/pyproject.toml
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-serialization-text>=1.11.1,<2.0.0packages/bundle/pyproject.toml
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-serialization-multipart>=1.11.1,<2.0.0packages/bundle/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 22

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 13 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-abstractions—direct
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-http—direct
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-serialization-form—direct
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-serialization-json—direct
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-serialization-multipart—direct
PyPImicrosoft-kiota-serialization-text—direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api—direct
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk—direct
PyPIstd-uritemplate—direct
PyPIaiohttp—indirect
PyPIazure-core—indirect
PyPIflit-core—indirect
PyPIhttpx—indirect
PyPIisort—indirect
PyPImypy—indirect
PyPIpylint—indirect
PyPIpylint3.2.7indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio—indirect
PyPIpytest-mock—indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil—indirect
PyPIyapf—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 1 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 21 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.