Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 07:11 UTC

microsoft / polyfills

A collection of polyfills for new web platform features.

JavaScriptMIT★ 8 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗

microsoft/polyfills holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (71/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (57/100). It was last updated 10 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

MicrosoftOrganization · verified domain

129,555 followers8,301 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@microsoft/focusgroup-polyfill	1.6.0	61,074	10	43 days ago	focusgroup polyfill edge html

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

67Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

61Moderate

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 10 days ago
8.3/36	Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
16.2/18	Commit volume — 62 commits in the last year
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

commits_last_year	62
human_commit_share	0.968
days_since_last_push	10
active_weeks_last_year	12

Release discipline

76Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 1 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 43 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	1
latest_release_tag	@microsoft/focusgroup-polyfill_v1.6.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	43
mean_days_between_releases	—

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

18Critical

How it's scored

13.7/60	Stars — 8 stars
4/25	Forks — 4 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	4
stars	8
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

80Excellent

How it's scored

63.8/80	Monthly downloads — 61,074 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@microsoft/focusgroup-polyfill
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	61,074
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

26At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 72% of commits
8.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	6
top_contributor_share	0.723

Issue & PR responsiveness

73Good

How it's scored

28/42	Issue resolution — 67% of issues closed
23/30	PR acceptance — 43/56 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
9/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 18/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

merged_prs	43
open_issues	2
closed_issues	4
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	2
prs_decided_30d	2
issue_closed_ratio	0.667
closed_unmerged_prs	13
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 129,555 followers of microsoft
25/25	Track record — 8,301 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	129,555
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	microsoft
public_repos	8,301
account_age_days	4,658

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 43 days ago
20/20	Version history — 10 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@microsoft/focusgroup-polyfill
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	43

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — biome.json
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

40Weak

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 18/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
6/7.5	Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5	Packaging — no data
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	5.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	11
affected_packages	5
assessed_packages	201
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 5
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 201 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

36Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36.4/40	Legible commit history — 41 of 60 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.683
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

78Good

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — biome.json
11/11	Static type checking — packages/focusgroup/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
6.5/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 62 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 62 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	packages/focusgroup/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.032
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.016

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (packages/focusgroup/tsconfig.json)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/43 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	40,032
source_files_sampled	43
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

8GitHub stars

6contributors

62commits, last 12 months

10days since last push

1releases

1bus factor

2open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿

0Stars

4Forks

1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10

5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 07:11 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
5	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6	Code-Review	Found 18/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
8	Maintained	9 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	10 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 201

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 201 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/biome	`2.4.13`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm64	`2.4.13`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-darwin-x64	`2.4.13`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64	`2.4.13`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl	`2.4.13`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-x64	`2.4.13`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl	`2.4.13`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-win32-arm64	`2.4.13`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-win32-x64	`2.4.13`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/core	`1.10.0`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.10.0`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/source-map	`0.3.11`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@microsoft/focusgroup-polyfill	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	@microsoft/shadowrootadoptedstylesheets-ponyfill	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.133.0`	indirect
npm	@playwright/test	`1.61.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@size-limit/esbuild	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	@size-limit/file	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	@size-limit/preset-small-lib	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.2`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`25.9.3`	indirect
npm	@types/parse-path	`7.0.3`	indirect
npm	@vercel/detect-agent	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	@yarnpkg/lockfile	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.17.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	beachball	`2.65.3`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.15`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	bytes-iec	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.20.3`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	cosmiconfig	`9.0.2`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	env-paths	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.4`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.1`	indirect
npm	execa	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.20.1`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	get-stream	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	git-up	`8.1.1`	indirect
npm	git-url-parse	`16.1.0`	indirect
npm	glob-hasher	`1.4.2`	indirect
npm	glob-hasher-darwin-arm64	`1.4.2`	indirect
npm	glob-hasher-darwin-x64	`1.4.2`	indirect
npm	glob-hasher-linux-x64-gnu	`1.4.2`	indirect
npm	glob-hasher-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.4.2`	indirect
npm	glob-hasher-win32-x64-msvc	`1.4.2`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	human-signals	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-ssh	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	is-stream	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jju	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	json-parse-even-better-errors	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	kleur	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	lage	`2.15.11`	indirect
npm	lefthook	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	lefthook-darwin-arm64	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	lefthook-darwin-x64	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	lefthook-freebsd-arm64	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	lefthook-freebsd-x64	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	lefthook-linux-arm64	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	lefthook-linux-x64	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	lefthook-openbsd-arm64	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	lefthook-openbsd-x64	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	lefthook-windows-arm64	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	lefthook-windows-x64	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lilconfig	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	lines-and-columns	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	merge-stream	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.8`	indirect
npm	mimic-fn	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.12`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`5.1.11`	indirect
npm	nanospinner	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	npm-run-path	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	onetime	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	p-graph	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	parse-path	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	parse-url	`9.2.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	playwright	`1.61.0`	indirect
npm	playwright-core	`1.61.0`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.15`	indirect
npm	prompts	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	protocols	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.4`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`3.0.7`	indirect
npm	sisteransi	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	size-limit	`12.1.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.21`	indirect
npm	strip-final-newline	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	terser	`5.46.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.24.6`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.0.16`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	workspace-tools	`0.41.8`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 201 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
brace-expansion	`1.1.15`	indirect	high	3	`5.0.9`
js-yaml	`4.2.0`	indirect	high	3	`4.3.2`
nanoid	`3.3.12`	indirect	high	2	`5.1.16`
nanoid	`5.1.11`	indirect	high	1	`5.1.16`
postcss	`8.5.15`	indirect	high	2	`8.5.23`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records