Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 18:36 UTC

miguelgrinberg / python-engineio

Python Engine.IO server and client

PythonMIT★ 257 stars⑂ 167 forkssince Jun 2015View on GitHub ↗

miguelgrinberg/python-engineio holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (76/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (54/100). It was last updated 29 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Miguel GrinbergPersonal account

12,935 followers204 public repossince Nov 2012Elastic

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
PyPI	python-engineio	4.13.3	-	145	29 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

65Good

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 29 days ago
11.1/36	Commit cadence — 16/52 weeks with commits
15.1/18	Commit volume — 47 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	47
human_commit_share	—
days_since_last_push	29
active_weeks_last_year	16

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 29 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~61.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v4.13.3
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	29
mean_days_between_releases	61.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

63Moderate

How it's scored

39.1/60	Stars — 257 stars
18.5/25	Forks — 167 forks
5.6/15	Watchers — 11 watchers

Inputs used

forks	167
stars	257
watchers	11
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

29At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 84% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 50 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	50
top_contributor_share	0.845

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good

How it's scored

41.5/42	Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
16.8/30	PR acceptance — 114/204 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	114
open_issues	3
closed_issues	224
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.987
closed_unmerged_prs	90
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

75Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
25/25	Owner reach — 12,935 followers of miguelgrinberg
25/25	Track record — 204 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	12,935
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	miguelgrinberg
public_repos	204
account_age_days	5,007

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 29 days ago
20/20	Version history — 145 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	python-engineio
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	29

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

66Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — tox.ini
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
2/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

85Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	python, socket-io, websocket
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 3 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
1.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 27 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	3
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:python-engineio@4.13.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 3 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

78Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — tox.ini
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8	Automated maintenance — no data
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	docs/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	—
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

50Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
50.4/55	Manageable file sizes — 6/71 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	120,917
source_files_sampled	71
oversized_source_files	6

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

257GitHub stars

50contributors

47commits, last 12 months

29days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

3open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10

5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 18:36 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1	CI-Tests	3 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	22 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
3	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0	Vulnerabilities	27 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 1

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	simple-websocket	`>= 0.10.0`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 255

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 254 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	simple-websocket	`—`	direct
npm	@socket.io/component-emitter	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@types/cors	`2.8.12`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`18.11.9`	indirect
npm	@types/ws	`8.18.1`	indirect
npm	accepts	`1.3.8`	indirect
npm	acorn	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	acorn	`4.0.13`	indirect
npm	amdefine	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	array-flatten	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	assert	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	astw	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	async	`0.2.10`	indirect
npm	Base64	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	base64-js	`0.0.7`	indirect
npm	base64id	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	body-parser	`1.20.5`	indirect
npm	browser-pack	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	browser-resolve	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	browserify	`4.1.9`	indirect
npm	browserify-zlib	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	buffer	`2.8.3`	indirect
npm	builtins	`0.0.7`	indirect
npm	bytes	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bound	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	callsite	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	camelcase	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	combine-source-map	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	commondir	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	concat-stream	`1.4.11`	indirect
npm	console-browserify	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	constants-browserify	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	content-disposition	`0.5.4`	indirect
npm	content-type	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`0.3.5`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	cookie	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	cookie-signature	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	core-util-is	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	cors	`2.8.5`	indirect
npm	crypto-browserify	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	debounce	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`2.6.9`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	decamelize	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	deep-equal	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	defined	`0.0.0`	indirect
npm	depd	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	deps-sort	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	derequire	`0.8.0`	indirect
npm	destroy	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	detective	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	domain-browser	`1.1.7`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	duplexer	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	duplexer2	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	ee-first	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	enchilada	`0.13.0`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	engine.io	`6.6.8`	indirect
npm	engine.io	`6.6.9`	indirect
npm	engine.io-client	`6.6.5`	indirect
npm	engine.io-client	`6.6.6`	indirect
npm	engine.io-parser	`5.2.3`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	escape-html	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	escodegen	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	escope	`0.0.16`	indirect
npm	esprima	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	esprima-fb	`3001.1.0-dev-harmony-fb`	indirect
npm	esrefactor	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`0.0.4`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	esutils	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	etag	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	events	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	express	`4.22.2`	indirect
npm	filewatcher	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	finalhandler	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	forwarded	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	fresh	`0.5.2`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	glob	`3.2.11`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	http-browserify	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	https-browserify	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.4.24`	indirect
npm	ieee754	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	indexof	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	inline-source-map	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	insert-module-globals	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	ipaddr.js	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	is-array	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	isarray	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsonparse	`0.0.5`	indirect
npm	JSONStream	`0.6.4`	indirect
npm	JSONStream	`0.7.4`	indirect
npm	lexical-scope	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`2.7.3`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	media-typer	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	merge-descriptors	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	methods	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	mime	`1.2.11`	indirect
npm	mime	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	minimist	`0.0.10`	indirect
npm	module-deps	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	ms	`0.7.1`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	negotiator	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	object-keys	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	on-finished	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	optimist	`0.3.7`	indirect
npm	os-browserify	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	pako	`0.2.9`	indirect
npm	parents	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	parents	`0.0.3`	indirect
npm	parseurl	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	path-browserify	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-platform	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`0.1.12`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`0.1.13`	indirect
npm	process	`0.5.2`	indirect
npm	process	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	process	`0.7.0`	indirect
npm	proxy-addr	`2.0.7`	indirect
npm	punycode	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	punycode	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.15.2`	indirect
npm	querystring	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	querystring-es3	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	range-parser	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	raw-body	`2.5.3`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`1.0.34`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`1.1.14`	indirect
npm	ready-signal	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	resolve	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	resolve	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	resolve	`0.7.4`	indirect
npm	rfile	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	ruglify	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	send	`0.19.0`	indirect
npm	serve-static	`1.16.2`	indirect
npm	setprototypeof	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	shallow-copy	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	shell-quote	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-list	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-weakmap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	sigmund	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	smoothie	`1.19.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.1.34`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.1.43`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.5.7`	indirect
npm	statuses	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	statuses	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	stream-browserify	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	stream-combiner	`0.0.4`	indirect
npm	stream-combiner	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`0.10.31`	indirect
npm	subarg	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	syntax-error	`1.1.6`	indirect
npm	through	`2.2.7`	indirect
npm	through	`2.3.8`	indirect
npm	through2	`0.4.2`	indirect
npm	timers-browserify	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	toidentifier	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	tty-browserify	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	type-is	`1.6.18`	indirect
npm	typedarray	`0.0.6`	indirect
npm	uglify-js	`2.2.5`	indirect
npm	uglify-js	`2.4.24`	indirect
npm	uglify-js	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	uglify-to-browserify	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	umd	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	unpipe	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	url	`0.10.3`	indirect
npm	util	`0.10.3`	indirect
npm	util	`0.10.4`	indirect
npm	utils-merge	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	vary	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	vm-browserify	`0.0.4`	indirect
npm	window-size	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	wordwrap	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.20.1`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.21.0`	indirect
npm	xmlhttprequest-ssl	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	xtend	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	xtend	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	yargs	`3.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	aiofiles	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`—`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.14.1`	indirect
PyPI	appdirs	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	async-timeout	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	chardet	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	click	`6.7`	indirect
PyPI	click	`7.0`	indirect
PyPI	enum-compat	`0.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	enum34	`1.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	eventlet	`0.40.3`	indirect
PyPI	flask	`1.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	greenlet	`0.4.12`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	httptools	`0.0.13`	indirect
PyPI	httptools	`0.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	itsdangerous	`0.24`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`0.23`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`2.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`5.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`16.8`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`2.1.10`	indirect
PyPI	python-engineio	`—`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sanic	`21.12.2`	indirect
PyPI	sanic-routing	`0.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`—`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	tornado	`6.5.7`	indirect
PyPI	ujson	`5.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.11.7`	indirect
PyPI	uvloop	`0.12.2`	indirect
PyPI	uvloop	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	websocket-client	`—`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`10.1`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`7.0`	indirect
PyPI	werkzeug	`2.3.8`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`0.8.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:python-engineio@4.13.3 pulls in 3 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records