Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 10:49 UTC

mikeb26 / octium

A Linux-only, ncurses based TUI AI coding agent.

GoAGPL-3.0★ 2 stars⑂ 1 forksince Nov 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindTerminal interfacehow this is determined

mikeb26/octium holds a health index of 44 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

44
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

44
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 46 is calibrated to 44 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

mikeb26Personal account
2 followers24 public repossince May 2021

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/mikeb26/octiumv0.18.4-627 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 7 days ago
18/36Commit cadence — 26/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 259 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year259
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year26
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 53 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 7 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~15.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count53
latest_release_tagv0.18.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release7
mean_days_between_releases15.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars2
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicespkg.go.dev, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

35Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.949
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of mikeb26
20.9/25Track record — 24 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmikeb26
public_repos24
account_age_days1,952
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 7 days ago
20/20Version history — 62 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/mikeb26/octium
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

42Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 13 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagentic-ai, ai-agent, ai-coding-agent, ai-coding-assistant, code-assistant, coding-agent, developer-tools, llm-agent, llm-agnostic, ncurses-tui, sandbox, terminal-ui, tui
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

35Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate1.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories58
affected_packages6
assessed_packages97
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 1, moderate 2, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 97 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 90 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.9
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes12,448
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/141 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes21,579
source_files_sampled141
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

2GitHub stars
2contributors
259commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
53releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.9 / 10
1.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 10:49 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/chromedp/chromedpv0.15.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/einov0.9.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/eino-ext/components/model/claudev0.1.21go.mod
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/eino-ext/components/model/geminiv0.1.32go.mod
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/eino-ext/components/model/openai-gov0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000go.mod
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/eino-ext/components/model/openrouterv0.1.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/famz/SetLocalev0.0.0-20140414113655-0457ad1065ddgo.mod
Gogithub.com/golang/mockv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/negrel/assertv0.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/rthornton128/goncursesv0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.43.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/genaiv1.58.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/anthropics/anthropic-sdk-gov1.37.0go.mod
All dependencies 97

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 84 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/anthropics/anthropic-sdk-gov1.26.0direct
Gogithub.com/chromedp/chromedpv0.15.1direct
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/einov0.9.1direct
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/eino-ext/components/model/claudev0.1.18direct
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/eino-ext/components/model/geminiv0.1.32direct
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/eino-ext/components/model/openrouterv0.1.10direct
Gogithub.com/famz/setlocalev0.0.0-20140414113655-0457ad1065dddirect
Gogithub.com/golang/mockv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/negrel/assertv0.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1direct
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.43.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/genaiv1.58.0direct
Gocloud.google.com/gov0.116.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/authv0.9.3indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/auth/oauth2adaptv0.2.4indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.33.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.29.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.17.54indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.16.24indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.3.28indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.6.28indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/iniv1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.12.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.12.9indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.24.11indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.28.10indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.33.9indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.22.1indirect
Gogithub.com/bahlo/generic-list-gov0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/buger/jsonparserv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/bytedance/gopkgv0.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/bytedance/sonicv1.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bytedance/sonic/loaderv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/chromedp/cdprotov0.0.0-20260321001828-e3e3800016bcindirect
Gogithub.com/chromedp/sysutilv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/base64xv0.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudwego/eino-ext/libs/acl/openaiv0.1.17indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/eino-contrib/jsonschemav1.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/evanphx/json-patchv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-json-experiment/jsonv0.0.0-20260214004413-d219187c3433indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/httpheadv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/poolv0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gobwas/wsv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcachev0.0.0-20210331224755-41bb18bfe9daindirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-gov0.1.8indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxyv0.3.4indirect
Gogithub.com/goph/emperrorv0.17.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/gov1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.2.9indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjsonv0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/meguminnnnnnnnn/go-openaiv0.1.2indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrentv0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect2v1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/nikolalohinski/gonjav1.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/openai/openai-go/v3v3.32.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2v2.0.9indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.3indirect
Gogithub.com/slongfield/pyfmtv0.0.0-20220222012616-ea85ff4c361findirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/gjsonv1.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/matchv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/prettyv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tidwall/sjsonv1.2.5indirect
Gogithub.com/twitchyliquid64/golang-asmv0.15.1indirect
Gogithub.com/wk8/go-ordered-map/v2v2.1.8indirect
Gogithub.com/yargevad/filepathxv1.0.0indirect
Gogo.opencensus.iov0.24.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpcv0.54.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.54.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.29.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.29.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.29.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/archv0.12.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20230713183714-613f0c0eb8a1indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.41.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.30.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.16.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.27.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.6.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.197.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20240903143218-8af14fe29dc1indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.66.2indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.34.2indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 97 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.40.0indirectcritical350.56.0
google.golang.org/grpcv1.66.2indirectcritical71.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
github.com/buger/jsonparserv1.1.1indirecthigh21.1.2
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.6.3indirectmoderate21.97.3
golang.org/x/netv0.41.0indirectmoderate111.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/textv0.27.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.