Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 14:16 UTC

mindroom-ai / mindroom

Your AI is trapped in apps. We set it free.

PythonApache-2.0★ 242 stars⑂ 10 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolMCP serverLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

mindroom-ai/mindroom holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on Security (46/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Mindroom AIOrganization
9 followers29 public repossince Oct 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPImindroom2026.8.10524,7101,2490 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 2,947 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,947
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year37

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2026.8.105
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

47Weak
How it's scored
38.6/60Stars — 242 stars
8/25Forks — 10 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars242
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

73Good
How it's scored
58.6/80Monthly downloads — 24,710 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmindroom
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads24,710
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

23At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.8/42Issue resolution — 54% of issues closed
27.7/30PR acceptance — 1,648/1,786 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1,648
open_issues33
closed_issues39
prs_merged_7d31
prs_decided_7d34
prs_merged_30d38
prs_decided_30d53
issue_closed_ratio0.542
closed_unmerged_prs138
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.2/25Owner reach — 9 followers of mindroom-ai
12.4/25Track record — 29 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmindroom-ai
public_repos29
account_age_days302

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 1,249 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmindroom
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 13 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.js, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.mindroom.chat
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://docs.mindroom.chat
docs_sitehttps://docs.mindroom.chat
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

46Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 200 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/configuration/agents.md, src/mindroom/cli/templates/mind_data/AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/configuration/agents.md, src/mindroom/cli/templates/mind_data/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes43,135

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.json, eslint.config.js, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — frontend/tsconfig.json, saas-platform/platform-frontend/tsconfig.json, src/mindroom/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfrontend/tsconfig.json, saas-platform/platform-frontend/tsconfig.json, src/mindroom/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

78Good
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (frontend/tsconfig.json, saas-platform/platform-frontend/tsconfig.json, src/mindroom/py.typed)
51.2/55Manageable file sizes — 112/1,639 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes389,657
source_files_sampled1,639
oversized_source_files112

Machine-readable interfaces

60Moderate
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — saas-platform/platform-backend/openapi.json
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filessaas-platform/platform-backend/openapi.json
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

242GitHub stars
3contributors
2,947commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
33open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'mindroom-dashboard' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:mindroom@2026.8.105; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 10 ⇿
0Stars
10Forks
25Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468101012026-042026-062026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 25
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 14:15 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities200 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 73
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@hookform/resolvers^5.2.2frontend/package.json
npm@lobehub/icons^5.8.0frontend/package.json
npm@monaco-editor/react^4.7.0frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-checkbox^1.3.3frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dialog^1.1.15frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu^2.1.16frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-label^2.1.8frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-popover^1.1.15frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-scroll-area^1.2.10frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-select^2.2.6frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-separator^1.1.8frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slot^1.2.4frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tabs^1.1.13frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-toast^1.2.15frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-toggle-group^1.1.11frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tooltip^1.2.8frontend/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.100.11frontend/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-table^8.21.3frontend/package.json
npm@types/js-yaml^4.0.9frontend/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.1frontend/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1frontend/package.json
npmjs-yaml^4.1.1frontend/package.json
npmlucide-react^1.16.0frontend/package.json
npmreact^19.2.6frontend/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.6frontend/package.json
npmreact-hook-form^7.76.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-icons^5.6.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-router-dom^7.15.1frontend/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^3.6.0frontend/package.json
npmzod^4.4.3frontend/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.13frontend/package.json
PyPIagno==2.6.12pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp>=3.13.3pyproject.toml
PyPIaiosqlite>=0.20pyproject.toml
PyPIanthropic>=0.120.2pyproject.toml
PyPIanyio>=4.10pyproject.toml
PyPIauthlib>=1.6pyproject.toml
PyPIcerebras-cloud-sdk>=1.46pyproject.toml
PyPIchromadb>=1.0.15pyproject.toml
PyPIcron-descriptor>=1.4.5pyproject.toml
PyPIcroniter>=6pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=47pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi>=0.116.1pyproject.toml
PyPIfiletype>=1.2pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-auth>=2.40.3pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-genai>=2,<2.9pyproject.toml
PyPIgroq>=0.31pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.27pyproject.toml
PyPIhumanize>=4.12.3pyproject.toml
PyPIidna>=3.13pyproject.toml
PyPIjinja2>=3.1pyproject.toml
PyPIjson5>=0.13pyproject.toml
PyPImarkdown-it-py>=4pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.12.4,<2pyproject.toml
PyPImdit-py-plugins>=0.5pyproject.toml
PyPImem0ai>=0.1.115pyproject.toml
PyPImindroom-nio>=0.40,<0.41pyproject.toml
PyPIopenai—pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging>=24pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic-settings>=2.10.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpygments>=2.20pyproject.toml
PyPIpyjwt>=2.8pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6pyproject.toml
PyPIrich—pyproject.toml
PyPIstructlog>=24.1pyproject.toml
PyPItenacity>=9.1.2pyproject.toml
PyPItiktoken>=0.12pyproject.toml
PyPItyper>=0.24pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn>=0.35pyproject.toml
PyPIwatchfiles>=1pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets>=14pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with mindroom-ai/mindroom. Read them side by side →

100risingwavelabs/risingwaveEvent streaming platform for agentic AI. Continuously ingest, transform, and serve event streams in real time, at scale.Exceptional100apache/airflowApache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflowsExceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional100mlco2/codecarbonTrack emissions from Compute and recommend ways to reduce their impact on the environment.Exceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional100Arize-ai/phoenixAI Observability & EvaluationExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.