Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 02:09 UTC

mlugg / setup-zig

Install a Zig compiler for usage in GitHub Actions workflows. Read-only mirror of https://codeberg.org/mlugg/setup-zig.

JavaScriptMIT★ 238 stars⑂ 42 forkssince Jun 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

mlugg/setup-zig holds a health index of 41 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (80/100) and lowest on Security (32/100). It was last updated 242 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

41
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

41
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 44 is calibrated to 41 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Matthew LuggPersonal account
384 followers74 public repossince Apr 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmdebugpoints to another repo — not scored4.4.32,690,863,40577370 days agodebuglogdebugger
npmeventspoints to another repo — not scored3.3.0333,982,464172029 days agoeventseventemittereventdispatcherlisteners
npmasynckitpoints to another repo — not scored0.5.0435,900,9855274 days agoasyncjobsparallelserialiteratorarrayobjectstreamdestroyterminateabort
npmes-errorspoints to another repo — not scored1.3.0675,009,5205956 days agojavascriptecmascripterrortypeerrorsyntaxerrorrangeerror
npmagent-basepoints to another repo — not scored9.0.0964,483,28933170 days agohttpagentbasebareboneshttps
npmconcat-mappoints to another repo — not scored0.0.2530,568,62731437 days agoconcatconcatmapmapfunctionalhigher-order
npmdeprecationpoints to another repo — not scored2.3.155,108,88572654 days agodeprecatedeprecateddeprecation
npmdunder-protopoints to another repo — not scored1.0.1603,267,6522640 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

42Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

18Critical
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recency — last push 242 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
11.5/18Commit volume — 18 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year18
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push242
active_weeks_last_year4

Release discipline

78Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 15 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 242 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~28.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv2.2.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release242
mean_days_between_releases28.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

55Moderate
How it's scored
38.5/60Stars — 238 stars
13.4/25Forks — 42 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks42
stars238
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

35Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 71% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.714

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

67Good
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.6/25Owner reach — 384 followers of mlugg
25/25Track record — 74 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers384
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmlugg
public_repos74
account_age_days4,540
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc, node_modules/debug/package.json ("xo")
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://codeberg.org/mlugg/setup-zig
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://codeberg.org/mlugg/setup-zig
docs_sitehttps://codeberg.org/mlugg/setup-zig
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

32At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

15Critical
How it's scored
5.2/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 28 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate1.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:debug@4.4.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

69Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — node_modules/undici/docs/api/Agent.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.8/40Legible commit history — 29 of 65 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.446
agent_instruction_filesnode_modules/undici/docs/api/Agent.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,797

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — node_modules/delayed-stream/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc, node_modules/debug/package.json ("xo")
11/11Static type checking — node_modules/call-bind-apply-helpers/tsconfig.json, node_modules/dunder-proto/tsconfig.json, node_modules/es-define-property/tsconfig.json, node_modules/es-errors/tsconfig.json, node_modules/es-object-atoms/tsconfig.json, node_modules/es-set-tostringtag/tsconfig.json, node_modules/get-proto/tsconfig.json, node_modules/gopd/tsconfig.json, node_modules/has-symbols/tsconfig.json, node_modules/has-tostringtag/tsconfig.json, node_modules/hasown/tsconfig.json, node_modules/math-intrinsics/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 65
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesnode_modules/delayed-stream/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsnode_modules/call-bind-apply-helpers/tsconfig.json, node_modules/dunder-proto/tsconfig.json, node_modules/es-define-property/tsconfig.json, node_modules/es-errors/tsconfig.json, node_modules/es-object-atoms/tsconfig.json, node_modules/es-set-tostringtag/tsconfig.json, node_modules/get-proto/tsconfig.json, node_modules/gopd/tsconfig.json, node_modules/has-symbols/tsconfig.json, node_modules/has-tostringtag/tsconfig.json, node_modules/hasown/tsconfig.json, node_modules/math-intrinsics/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (node_modules/call-bind-apply-helpers/tsconfig.json, node_modules/dunder-proto/tsconfig.json, node_modules/es-define-property/tsconfig.json, node_modules/es-errors/tsconfig.json, node_modules/es-object-atoms/tsconfig.json, node_modules/es-set-tostringtag/tsconfig.json, node_modules/get-proto/tsconfig.json, node_modules/gopd/tsconfig.json, node_modules/has-symbols/tsconfig.json, node_modules/has-tostringtag/tsconfig.json, node_modules/hasown/tsconfig.json, node_modules/math-intrinsics/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/4 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes8,971
source_files_sampled4
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

238GitHub stars
8contributors
18commits, last 12 months
242days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'setup-zig' from its registry
  • npm package 'debug' points at a different repository (https://github.com/debug-js/debug); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'events' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Gozala/events); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'asynckit' points at a different repository (https://github.com/alexindigo/asynckit); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'es-errors' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ljharb/es-errors); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'agent-base' points at a different repository (https://github.com/TooTallNate/proxy-agents); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'concat-map' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ljharb/concat-map); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'deprecation' points at a different repository (https://github.com/gr2m/deprecation); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'dunder-proto' points at a different repository (https://github.com/es-shims/dunder-proto); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 42 ⇿
0Stars
42Forks
11Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504222024-062025-072026-09
Major 1Minor 2Patch 8

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.5 / 10
1.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 02:09 UTC

7Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities28 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@actions/cache^4.0.2package.json
npm@actions/core^1.11.1package.json
npm@actions/exec^1.1.1package.json
npm@actions/github^6.0.1package.json
npm@actions/tool-cache^2.0.2package.json
npmevent-target-shim^5.0.0node_modules/abort-controller/package.json
npmbalanced-match^1.0.0node_modules/brace-expansion/package.json
npmconcat-map0.0.1node_modules/brace-expansion/package.json
npmes-errors^1.3.0node_modules/call-bind-apply-helpers/package.json
npmfunction-bind^1.1.2node_modules/call-bind-apply-helpers/package.json
npmdelayed-stream~1.0.0node_modules/combined-stream/package.json
npmms^2.1.3node_modules/debug/package.json
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers^1.0.1node_modules/dunder-proto/package.json
npmes-errors^1.3.0node_modules/dunder-proto/package.json
npmgopd^1.2.0node_modules/dunder-proto/package.json
npmes-errors^1.3.0node_modules/es-object-atoms/package.json
npmes-errors^1.3.0node_modules/es-set-tostringtag/package.json
npmget-intrinsic^1.2.6node_modules/es-set-tostringtag/package.json
npmhas-tostringtag^1.0.2node_modules/es-set-tostringtag/package.json
npmhasown^2.0.2node_modules/es-set-tostringtag/package.json
npmstrnum^2.1.0node_modules/fast-xml-parser/package.json
All dependencies 92

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 74 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@actions/cache4.1.0direct
npm@actions/core1.11.1direct
npm@actions/exec1.1.1direct
npm@actions/github6.0.1direct
npm@actions/tool-cache2.0.2direct
npmbalanced-match1.0.2direct
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2direct
npmconcat-map0.0.1direct
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0direct
npmes-errors1.3.0direct
npmevent-target-shim5.0.1direct
npmfunction-bind1.1.2direct
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0direct
npmgopd1.2.0direct
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2direct
npmhasown2.0.2direct
npmms2.1.3direct
npmstrnum2.1.1direct
npm@actions/glob0.1.2indirect
npm@actions/http-client2.2.3indirect
npm@actions/io1.1.3indirect
npm@azure/abort-controller1.1.0indirect
npm@azure/abort-controller2.1.2indirect
npm@azure/core-auth1.10.1indirect
npm@azure/core-client1.10.1indirect
npm@azure/core-http-compat2.3.1indirect
npm@azure/core-lro2.7.2indirect
npm@azure/core-paging1.6.2indirect
npm@azure/core-rest-pipeline1.22.2indirect
npm@azure/core-tracing1.3.1indirect
npm@azure/core-util1.13.1indirect
npm@azure/core-xml1.5.0indirect
npm@azure/logger1.3.0indirect
npm@azure/ms-rest-js2.7.0indirect
npm@azure/storage-blob12.29.1indirect
npm@azure/storage-common12.1.1indirect
npm@fastify/busboy2.1.1indirect
npm@octokit/auth-token4.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/core5.2.2indirect
npm@octokit/endpoint9.0.6indirect
npm@octokit/graphql7.1.1indirect
npm@octokit/openapi-types20.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/openapi-types24.2.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest9.2.2indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods10.4.1indirect
npm@octokit/request8.4.1indirect
npm@octokit/request-error5.1.1indirect
npm@octokit/types12.6.0indirect
npm@octokit/types13.10.0indirect
npm@protobuf-ts/runtime2.11.1indirect
npm@protobuf-ts/runtime-rpc2.11.1indirect
npm@typespec/ts-http-runtime0.3.2indirect
npmabort-controller3.0.0indirect
npmagent-base7.1.4indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmbefore-after-hook2.2.3indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.12indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeprecation2.3.1indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.1indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.1.0indirect
npmevents3.3.0indirect
npmfast-xml-parser5.3.2indirect
npmform-data2.5.5indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent7.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmnode-fetch2.7.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsax1.4.3indirect
npmsemver6.3.1indirect
npmtr460.0.3indirect
npmtslib1.14.1indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtunnel0.0.6indirect
npmundici5.29.0indirect
npmuniversal-user-agent6.0.1indirect
npmuuid8.3.2indirect
npmwebidl-conversions3.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-url5.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmxml2js0.5.0indirect
npmxmlbuilder11.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:debug@4.4.3 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with mlugg/setup-zig. Read them side by side →

100metabase/metabaseThe easy-to-use open source Business Intelligence and Embedded Analytics tool that lets everyone work with data :bar_chart:Exceptional100authelia/autheliaThe Single Sign-On Multi-Factor portal for web apps. OpenID Certified™ and Post-Quantum Cryptography Ready.Exceptional100coder/coderSecure environments for developers and their agentsExceptional100mattermost/mattermostMattermost is an open source platform for secure collaboration across the entire software development lifecycle..Exceptional100mlco2/codecarbonTrack emissions from Compute and recommend ways to reduce their impact on the environment.Exceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.