Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 04:54 UTC

mmacpherson / python-lucide

Provides lucide icons for use in python without any JS.

Python · SvelteMIT★ 5 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

mmacpherson/python-lucide holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (39/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Mike MacphersonPersonal account
33 followers18 public repossince Sep 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIpython-lucide0.5.1014,849422 days agoiconslucidesqlitesvg

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 123 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year123
human_commit_share0.49
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year37
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 22 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagsearch-v1.59.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases3.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars — 5 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars5
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
55.6/80Monthly downloads — 14,849 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespython-lucide
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads14,849
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
27.8/30PR acceptance — 191/206 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs191
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs15
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11/25Owner reach — 33 followers of mmacpherson
21.3/25Track record — 18 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers33
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginmmacpherson
public_repos18
account_age_days4,770
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 42 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespython-lucide
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 21 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://mmacpherson.github.io/python-lucide/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://mmacpherson.github.io/python-lucide/
docs_sitehttps://mmacpherson.github.io/python-lucide/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests — 21 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 26 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories26
affected_packages9
assessed_packages176
unassessed_packages16
affected_by_severityhigh 7, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 176 resolved dependencies against OSV. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

87Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 49 of 49 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,108
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — web/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 50 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 13 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsweb/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.5
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.13
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (web/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/31 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes33,525
source_files_sampled31
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

5GitHub stars
1contributors
123commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
22releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 04:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
7CI-Tests21 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained13 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities26 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@huggingface/transformers^3.4.0web/package.json
All dependencies 192

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 191 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@huggingface/transformers3.8.1direct
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.0indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.25.12indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.25.12indirect
npm@huggingface/jinja0.5.9indirect
npm@img/colour1.1.0indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-darwin-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-darwin-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm1.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-ppc641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-riscv641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-s390x1.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linux-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-arm641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-libvips-linuxmusl-x641.2.4indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm0.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-ppc640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-riscv640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-s390x0.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linux-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-linuxmusl-x640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-wasm320.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-arm640.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-ia320.34.5indirect
npm@img/sharp-win32-x640.34.5indirect
npm@isaacs/fs-minipass4.0.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@protobufjs/aspromise1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/base641.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/codegen2.0.5indirect
npm@protobufjs/eventemitter1.1.1indirect
npm@protobufjs/fetch1.1.1indirect
npm@protobufjs/float1.0.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/inquire1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/path1.1.2indirect
npm@protobufjs/pool1.1.0indirect
npm@protobufjs/utf81.1.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.61.1indirect
npm@sveltejs/acorn-typescript1.0.10indirect
npm@sveltejs/load-config0.1.1indirect
npm@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte5.1.1indirect
npm@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte-inspector4.0.1indirect
npm@tsconfig/svelte5.0.8indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node25.9.2indirect
npm@types/trusted-types2.0.7indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmaria-query5.3.1indirect
npmaxobject-query4.1.0indirect
npmboolean3.2.0indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmchownr3.0.0indirect
npmclsx2.1.1indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeepmerge4.3.1indirect
npmdefine-data-property1.1.4indirect
npmdefine-properties1.2.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdetect-node2.1.0indirect
npmdevalue5.8.1indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes6-error4.1.1indirect
npmesbuild0.25.12indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmesm-env1.2.2indirect
npmesrap2.2.11indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmflatbuffers25.9.23indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmglobal-agent3.0.0indirect
npmglobalthis1.0.4indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmguid-typescript1.0.9indirect
npmhas-property-descriptors1.0.2indirect
npmis-reference3.0.3indirect
npmjson-stringify-safe5.0.1indirect
npmkleur4.1.5indirect
npmlocate-character3.0.0indirect
npmlong5.3.2indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmatcher3.0.0indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmminizlib3.1.0indirect
npmmri1.2.0indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.12indirect
npmobject-keys1.1.1indirect
npmonnxruntime-common1.21.0indirect
npmonnxruntime-common1.22.0-dev.20250409-89f8206ba4indirect
npmonnxruntime-node1.21.0indirect
npmonnxruntime-web1.22.0-dev.20250409-89f8206ba4indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmplatform1.3.6indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmprotobufjs7.6.3indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmroarr2.15.4indirect
npmrollup4.61.1indirect
npmsade1.8.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.3indirect
npmsemver-compare1.0.0indirect
npmserialize-error7.0.1indirect
npmsharp0.34.5indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsprintf-js1.1.3indirect
npmsvelte5.56.3indirect
npmsvelte-check4.6.0indirect
npmtar7.5.16indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtype-fest0.13.1indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmundici-types7.24.6indirect
npmvite6.4.3indirect
npmvitefu1.1.3indirect
npmyallist5.0.0indirect
npmzimmerframe1.1.4indirect
PyPIcairosvg—indirect
PyPIfastembed—indirect
PyPIhatchling—indirect
PyPIhdbscan—indirect
PyPImypy—indirect
PyPImypy-extensions—indirect
PyPInumba—indirect
PyPIplotly—indirect
PyPIpre-commit—indirect
PyPIpydantic-ai-slim—indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest-cov—indirect
PyPIruff—indirect
PyPItypes-setuptools—indirect
PyPItyping-extensions—indirect
PyPIumap-learn—indirect
Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 176 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 16 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
devalue5.8.1indirecthigh85.9.3
nanoid3.3.12indirecthigh25.1.16
postcss8.5.15indirecthigh28.5.23
sharp0.34.5indirecthigh30.35.5
source-map-js1.2.1indirecthigh11.2.2
tar7.5.16indirecthigh57.5.21
vite6.4.3indirecthigh38.3.3
protobufjs7.6.3indirectmoderate18.6.6
sprintf-js1.1.3indirectmoderate1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.