Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-03 12:44 UTC

mnemom / aip

Agent Integrity Protocol — real-time thinking block analysis for AI agent alignment

TypeScript · PythonApache-2.0★ 9 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#agent#ai#alignment#integrity#llm#protocol#safety#thinking

mnemom/aip holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (54/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Mnemom.aiOrganization
23 followers11 public repossince Feb 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIagent-integrity-proto1.3.03481514 days agoagentaialignmentconscienceintegrityllmsafetythinking
npm@mnemom/agent-integrity-protocol1.3.06,9762035 days agoaiagentintegrityalignmentthinkingconsciencesafety

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 141 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 28 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year141
human_commit_share0.65
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year28

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 14 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 35 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~21.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count14
latest_release_tagv1.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release35
mean_days_between_releases21.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

54Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

15Critical
How it's scored
14.6/60Stars — 9 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars9
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

64Moderate
How it's scored
51.5/80Monthly downloads — 7,324 downloads/month across npm, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesagent-integrity-proto, @mnemom/agent-integrity-protocol
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads7,324
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

31At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 53% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.534

Issue & PR responsiveness

58Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/42Issue resolution — 60% of issues closed
19.9/30PR acceptance — 93/140 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 5/5 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs93
open_issues4
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0.6
closed_unmerged_prs47
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d5
first_time_prs_decided_30d5

Ownership & stewardship

49Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.9/25Owner reach — 23 followers of mnemom
9.2/25Track record — 11 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers23
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginmnemom
public_repos11
account_age_days244

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 14 days ago
20/20Version history — 20 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesagent-integrity-proto, @mnemom/agent-integrity-protocol
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish14

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — packages/python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/mnemom/aip/blob/main/docs/SPEC.md
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagent, ai, alignment, integrity, llm, protocol, safety, thinking
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://github.com/mnemom/aip/blob/main/docs/SPEC.md
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

80Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

75Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 28 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages7
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:agent-integrity-proto@1.3.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 7 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

92Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.mnemom.ai/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 62 of 65 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.mnemom.ai/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.954
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,973

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

81Excellent
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — packages/python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — packages/python/src/aip/py.typed, packages/typescript/tsconfig.json, packages/verifier/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 55 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 27 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/python/src/aip/py.typed, packages/typescript/tsconfig.json, packages/verifier/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.55
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.27

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/135 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes39,483
source_files_sampled135
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

9GitHub stars
4contributors
141commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
14releases
1bus factor
4open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package '@mnemom/aip-verifier' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.5 / 10
7.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-03 12:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained28 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIhttpx>=0.27packages/python/pyproject.toml
npm@noble/ed25519^3.0.0packages/typescript/package.json
npm@noble/hashes^2.0.1packages/typescript/package.json
npm@noble/ed25519^3.0.0packages/verifier/package.json
npm@noble/hashes^2.0.1packages/verifier/package.json
All dependencies 205

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 199 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@noble/ed255193.0.0direct
npm@noble/ed255193.1.0direct
npm@noble/hashes2.0.1direct
npm@noble/hashes2.2.0direct
PyPIhttpx—direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.149.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.60.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.60.1indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/node25.2.3indirect
npm@types/node25.9.3indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.11indirect
npmacorn8.15.0indirect
npmany-promise1.3.0indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmbundle-require5.1.0indirect
npmcac6.7.14indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmcommander4.1.1indirect
npmconfbox0.1.8indirect
npmconsola3.4.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.0.0indirect
npmesbuild0.28.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfix-dts-default-cjs-exports1.0.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmjoycon3.1.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlilconfig3.1.3indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmload-tsconfig0.2.5indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmlly1.8.0indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmmz2.7.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobug2.1.1indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpirates4.0.7indirect
npmpkg-types1.3.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.28indirect
npmpostcss-load-config6.0.1indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmrolldown1.2.8indirect
npmrollup4.60.1indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.7.6indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.0.0indirect
npmsucrase3.35.1indirect
npmthenify3.3.1indirect
npmthenify-all1.6.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec0.3.2indirect
npmtinyexec1.1.1indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.1indirect
npmtree-kill1.2.2indirect
npmts-interface-checker0.1.13indirect
npmtsup8.5.1indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmufo1.6.3indirect
npmundici-types7.16.0indirect
npmundici-types7.24.6indirect
npmvite8.2.2indirect
npmvitest4.1.11indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
PyPIagent-integrity-proto1.3.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.5.0indirect
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0indirect
PyPIbuild1.6.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.3indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.11.0indirect
PyPImypy—indirect
PyPImypy2.1.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpip26.2.1indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.3.3indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio—indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov—indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIrespx—indirect
PyPIrespx0.23.1indirect
PyPIruff—indirect
PyPIruff0.15.19indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:agent-integrity-proto@1.3.0 pulls in 7 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with mnemom/aip. Read them side by side →

98bytedance/deer-flowAn open-source long-horizon SuperAgent harness that researches, codes, and creates. With the help of sandboxes, memories, tools, skill, subagents and message gateway, it handles different levels of tasks that could take minutes to hours.Exceptional98googleapis/mcp-toolboxMCP Toolbox for Databases is an open source MCP server for databases.Exceptional98ModelEngine-Group/nexentNexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering principles — unified tools, skills, memory, and orchestration with built-in constraints, feedback loops, and control planes.Exceptional97langgenius/difyBuild Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.Exceptional96e2b-dev/E2BOpen-source, secure environment with real-world tools for enterprise-grade agents.Exceptional96CopilotKit/CopilotKitThe Frontend Stack for Agents & Generative UI. React, Angular, Mobile, Slack, and more. Makers of the AG-UI ProtocolExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI, npm.